Much as I like Ben, I don't think he's going to even make the final. He's middle of the pack at best for me.

As are you and you think what he said was just spot on, nastiness an' all.

And if you can put that out there - then I can put mine out there too - come on, just drop it, it's only a shooooow.

And I can say what the hell I want about Barrowman's views, he's put them out there an' all.

That's the size of it, lovely though Ben is.

I can't take JBs opinion seriously.

double post

True...but then at least it's nowhere near as ludicrously OTT as all the anger over Natalie's previous dance experience.

Excellent, could never have said it better

Not quiet right.......! Don't think Ben and Christina will win though.............!

I would stake everything I have that that is a hypothetical situation which will never, ever happen. So it's immaterial.

Until it does .

Which it won't. No. Never. (Stick to your guns you wuss.)

I don't see how Abbey has a journey to go on, she started of very good. Didn't her waltz in week 1 get a score of 32?

Yep, and she's carried on being very good, but not great, the whole way through.

That's true but she's had a couple of dips along the way. Sophie also, if she can come back with a couple of good dances, her bad weeks will be forgotten and she will be a real threat.

WHO is he?


I thought he would make sense but the above quote/post sums it up perfectly.

I didn't hear Barrowman say anything nasty about anyone. The reaction to his comments by some people are completely OTT.

There have been comments on various threads about Scouser Abbey being incoherent, and there was even a link to a story about her cheating on Peter Crouch while she was on coke - what the heck does that have to do with her appearing on Strictly?

She was borderline incoherent, that's just factual.

And if you don't think that singling out Natalie as being unpopular and will leave in two weeks wasn't nasty with NO evidence, on ITT the show's sister show, then I don't know what to say to you.

Only a show though eh?

Spot on

No, she wasn't. You may have found it hard to understand her, but I didn't. That's your opinion, it isn't fact.

Strange how you don't consider your singling out of Abbey's accent as nasty though

I'm on a board, her accent got thicker and more obvious, it's annoying because it might be put on, though it might not be. The girl is capable of speaking more clearly.

I'm not on a TV show trashing one of the celebrities.

Get some perspective and stop being silly.

It is NOT factual because that's your opinion and some people opinions.
Opinions are not facts !

Right, okay then. She sounded borderline incoherent to ME.

Barrowman, was OBJECTIVELY nasty to Nat though, wasn't he?

Now my being annoyed at Abbey isn't on the same level.

Having a go at me for that is just a diversion.

it's obvious and it doesn't make you sound clever, it is SILLY.

And everything I say is my damned opinion if it's not a fact.

I'm not being silly at all, I'm just disagreeing with you. Your word isn't gospel.

Saying things like 'it's annoying because it might be put on' and 'the girl is capable of speaking more clearly', how patronising is that? -- little digs, there's no need for it.

You are obviously taking it very seriously because you keep harping on and on about it

It's just my terrible calling to try and educate the bewildered

Last sentence, glad that you got it

And once again it's not objectively because that's your opinion. Something that is your opinion : " he was nasty to Nat " isn't objective because that's your opinion ( and probably some people opinions too ).
You are perfectly entitled to have your opinions as we all are but something that is Your opinion isn't objective
Last edited by edy10 : 09-11-2013 at 02:43

Yeah right

Cobblers Edy.

Anybody that thinks what JB said about Nat today and his prediction that she'd leave, on ITT with all the fans watching, with no evidence of her unpopularity, wasn't nasty, is BEWILDERED.

At least.

Some are seriously nuts mind.