• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Is Strictly a Farce?
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
Monaogg
10-11-2013
Originally Posted by nepotism46:
“I would have said the same about Dave,Mark and Fiona. Fair's fair and no difference with them if they did a Natalie in my opinion. If they don't show, it's time to go!”

The rules state otherwise - so live with it.

Bruce has missed 2 weeks now, should he not be excluded.
Monkseal
10-11-2013
The fairest thing would be to run the competition the way they all signed up to it taking place, rather than fiddling the rules, and giving people extra weeks. I'm not sure why giving someone a bye because they fainted is any less fair than giving [*insert the spoiler name of this week's eliminee here*] a bye because someone else fainted, which is in effect what you're proposing doing.
nepotism46
10-11-2013
Originally Posted by henrywilliams58:
“What happens if a contestant in the bottom two falls ill or twists something on Saturday night before they have a chance to compete in the dance-off on Sunday?”

That's silly question! But i'll answer it.
If they fall before the dance off and can't dance they should be eliminated. That's fair!
hannah
10-11-2013
No it isn't a farce, there was a good reason why Natalie couldnt perform yesterday and I think its fair that she has gotten a bye to next week, whether or not we will see her dance next week. Im not saying this because Natalie is my favourite I would feel the same about one of the others who fell ill and couldnt perform.
nepotism46
10-11-2013
Originally Posted by Monaogg:
“The rules state otherwise - so live with it.

Bruce has missed 2 weeks now, should he not be excluded. ”

If he was an act well yes! But he's a presenter who was getting treatment for varicose veins so it doesn't count!
KnowAll27
10-11-2013
If someone phones in sick to work, should everyone else get a day off?

Because NOT having a couple leave this weekend because Natalie is ill is basically the same thing......
henrywilliams58
10-11-2013
Originally Posted by mossy2103:
“You do realise that the Dance Off is recorded on the Saturday .....”

No! You are kidding me.

I've always suspected that some people know the results before the dance off happens.
Espresso
10-11-2013
Originally Posted by nepotism46:
“Yes i know i do moan but how would you feel if you were one of the acts getting booted off this week. I'm only moaning for them! I just want things to be done fair even though some of the dances were bad.
I might be a big moaner but come on let's make it fair.”

If whoever did get kicked out last night imagines that they have stolen Natalie and Artem's place as the eliminated couple, then they'd have to be completely off their onion.
Personally, I doubt that we'll see Natalie and Artem in any dance off.
nepotism46
10-11-2013
Originally Posted by KnowAll27:
“If someone phones in sick to work, should everyone else get a day off?

Because NOT having a couple leave this weekend because Natalie is ill is basically the same thing......”

Same could apply to this.
I remember reading a few months ago in the paper about a prisoner who kept saying he was too sick and collapsing to face the judge. The same judge said nobody is never that ill, demanded they go and get him and stop this stupid tax payers waste and ludicrous situation.
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map