|
||||||||
T-Mobile full monty questions |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,645
|
T-Mobile full monty questions
I called T-Mobile to request a PAC today, and of course the customer service rep went through the usual motions of recommending deals to try to get me to stay. I mentioned that I was intending to move to the 3 One Plan (sim only) and that tethering is important.
She then quoted that she could offer me something that looked like the full monty but at 17.50/month, and including tethering (mentioned something about unlimited usage on phone and 5GB while tethering). I'm not sure if she was telling the truth as I was under the impression that FM did not allow tethering as of a recent tariff change. Is there an addon that can be applied to make it work (and give me 5GB of data for that?) I'm tempted to stay if what they are offering is correct because it means I'll get the seamless 2G backup and possibly a less congested network. But I don't want to agree to a new contract and find out it's not what I was sold (could probably get out of it on that basis but it's a hassle I don't want). So can someone who knows about all of this clarify whether what she said was true? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: London, UK
Posts: 8,759
|
It is the super internet booster which gives you 5GB tethering.
I'm pretty sure it caps your overall usage to 5GB though. So it's basically swapping unlimited for 5GB. Although i could be wrong. Also you get uncapped speeds. Are you sure it was £17.50pm and not £19pm. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,645
|
She quoted 17.50 for 'unlimited' and 13 for "3gb", perhaps the discount is variable depending on who you are (in my case, a SIM only customer who is out of contract and doesn't spend that much with them). I asked if the 17.50 tariff is a discounted full monty and she said it was.
It seems very confusing - the way she worded it, it sounded like browsing would be unlimited and "s tuff like youtube" would be part of the 5GB limit. I've been burned before by T-Mobile's ridiculously complicated data packages (stupid 384k limit on ancient internet boosters but not on others) so perhaps I should get this in writing or something before I commit. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,319
|
full monty speed is also capped at 4Mbps while 3's is unrestricted. You'll also get free 4G on 3 which is a bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: London, UK
Posts: 8,759
|
That sounds like the Super Internet booster.
Are you sure it was on the full monty plan though? I'd get it confirmed in writing though. I doubt you can go over the 5GB limit at all. If you can go over it'll be £1 a day. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,645
|
Quote:
full monty speed is also capped at 4Mbps while 3's is unrestricted. You'll also get free 4G on 3 which is a bonus
The prospect of 4G is enticing provided that 3 do an aggressive rollout. Otherwise it's pointless if I'm not going to be able to use it where I am. I am in Cornwall and so far even EE have yet to get to Plymouth... |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,645
|
Quote:
That sounds like the Super Internet booster.
Are you sure it was on the full monty plan though? I'd get it confirmed in writing though. I doubt you can go over the 5GB limit at all. If you can go over it'll be £1 a day. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,091
|
Quote:
To be honest I don't get excellent speeds on 3's network no matter where I am - getting anything over 5Mbps is a bonus, and in urban areas the performance is nothing great. I was in Reading earlier this week, getting anything over 1Mbit in the hotel I was in was an achievement and that's with a belting signal. This is with a 14Mbps HSPA device, I don't know if it would be better with a DCHSPA phone. My T-Mobile SIM in another phone did quite a bit better. Perhaps it's an excuse to get a Nexus 5.
The prospect of 4G is enticing provided that 3 do an aggressive rollout. Otherwise it's pointless if I'm not going to be able to use it where I am. I am in Cornwall and so far even EE have yet to get to Plymouth... Having said that, my experience with T-Mobile FM hasn't been good at all. Lots of dropped calls, frequent periods of no data throughput, and now there's zero chance of an HD call because I can't remember the last time my phone didn't drop the 3G signal during a call. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Rutland
Posts: 564
|
Quote:
full monty speed is also capped at 4Mbps while 3's is unrestricted. You'll also get free 4G on 3 which is a bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: This forum
Posts: 3,392
|
Quote:
This is pretty much what I've found when trying out a 3 SIM in an iPhone 5 for the last couple of weeks. I got 7Mbs in Barnsley today, and that's the highest I've seen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,286
|
Quote:
full monty speed is also capped at 4Mbps while 3's is unrestricted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Liverpool(L15)l, UK
Posts: 458
|
Quote:
The best speeds on 3 are on the mobile broadband SIMs rather than the voice SIMs as they seem to have network priority (e.g. tablet) - but you don't get unlimited on those
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: This forum
Posts: 3,392
|
Quote:
i've seen people saying that nonsense for some time. but i have both and never seen a difference in performance. infact i see faster on my phone in general probably because of MIMO
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 667
|
Quote:
i've seen people saying that nonsense for some time. but i have both and never seen a difference in performance. infact i see faster on my phone in general probably because of MIMO
In my personal experience of both, I would agree with that also. I tend to get 5 - 6 mbps from a '3' branded Mi-fi with a mobile broadband sim, but 10mbps pretty routinely from a tethered £100 Chinese Cubot GT-99 phone with the One Plan Sim.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: London, UK
Posts: 8,759
|
Quote:
i've seen people saying that nonsense for some time. but i have both and never seen a difference in performance. infact i see faster on my phone in general probably because of MIMO
Quote:
In my personal experience of both, I would agree with that also. I tend to get 5 - 6 mbps from a '3' branded Mi-fi with a mobile broadband sim, but 10mbps pretty routinely from a tethered £100 Chinese Cubot GT-99 phone with the One Plan Sim.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Liverpool(L15)l, UK
Posts: 458
|
Quote:
Well that would make sense if the phone supports DC-HSPA+ and the Mi-Fi doesn't.
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: London, UK
Posts: 8,759
|
Quote:
Yes. however it was about network priority not the device itself
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Liverpool(L15)l, UK
Posts: 458
|
Quote:
I know but you'd have to test two devices with the same hardware support to see network priority properly.
Meaning if DC-hsdpa was doing 10Mbps hspa and LTE should be able to do that too if not it would be obvious throttling or QoS. |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,286
|
There's way too much variation between phones simply in terms of radio and firmware performance to draw any concrete conclusions without swapping the same SIM card(s) between the two under the same conditions. You don't just want to test two devices with the same hardware support - you really want to test one individual device with multiple SIMs. Case in point - Galaxy S2 vs. Galaxy S3, both rated as 21Mbps down, 5.76Mbps up, HSPA+ 3GPP release 7. 0.3Mbps on the S2, 7.4Mbps on the S3 on O2, same location, same SIM.
Even then moving a device a few centimetres or changing its orientation can more than quadruple your speeds so it's still meaningless without an appropriate control (e.g. fixed location stand). |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,286
|
Quote:
to an extent yes. but you wouldnt for example expect a huge difference between hspa and dc-hspa or LTE.
Meaning if DC-hsdpa was doing 10Mbps hspa and LTE should be able to do that too if not it would be obvious throttling or QoS. If DC-HSDPA was doing 10Mbps you'd expect HSPA to be doing 5Mbps. LTE could easily do 40Mbps under the same conditions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Liverpool(L15)l, UK
Posts: 458
|
Quote:
Uh yes you would.
If DC-HSDPA was doing 10Mbps you'd expect HSPA to be doing 5Mbps. LTE could easily do 40Mbps under the same conditions. |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,286
|
The only thing there is to understand is you've completely twisted the subject beyond recognition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Liverpool(L15)l, UK
Posts: 458
|
Quote:
The only thing there is to understand is you've completely twisted the subject beyond recognition.
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:50.


