|
||||||||
Chrome and Android 2? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dumfries
Posts: 38,495
|
Chrome and Android 2?
Just something I thought I'd ask...
Missus gave her old Galaxy Ace to somebody when she upgraded and I was asked to do a factory reset on it and then install a bunch of app's. The built-in browser is kinda sucky so I thought I'd install Chrome on it but, for some reason, Chrome just doesn't appear in the Android Market when viewed on the Galaxy Ace. Wondered if Chrome was missing from the Market for some reason but when I view the market on a phone and tablet running Jellybean it's there. It's just not there when viewed on the Ace, running Gingerbread. Is that cos Chrome isn't compatible with Gingerbread any more or summat?
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 6,600
|
Chrome has never been compatible with Gingerbread as far as I'm aware, only with devices running 4.0 and above. I know that my old Xperia phone that was running 2.3 was never able to download Chrome while it was available for everyone else.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dumfries
Posts: 38,495
|
Quote:
Chrome has never been compatible with Gingerbread as far as I'm aware, only with devices running 4.0 and above. I know that my old Xperia phone that was running 2.3 was never able to download Chrome while it was available for everyone else.
Never knew that. Kinda remiss for google not to make their own browser compatible with Android. Figured that was the case but I thought I'd ask.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newbury
Posts: 6,752
|
Quote:
Kinda remiss for google not to make their own browser compatible with Android.
If software developers made their apps compatible with every version since it first came out, they wouldn't be able to take advantage of the additional features in the later versions, and the apps would be highly constricted in what they could do. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,921
|
Quote:
Ah, right ho.
Never knew that. Kinda remiss for google not to make their own browser compatible with Android. Figured that was the case but I thought I'd ask. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dumfries
Posts: 38,495
|
Quote:
Chrome is, erm, not the smoothest of browsers anyway. It wouldn't run well on an Arm v6 800mhz processor found in the Ace. And it is a big app that can't be moved to the SD card, it would take a large chunk of the internal memory. All in all it is better that you can't install it.
Must admit, I don't know a huge amount about Android and I guess that's the sort of thing I wouldn't notice on a quad core phone/tablet. Did read a bunch of reviews of browsers and Chrome always seems to do well so that's why I installed it (even though I did notice it was a much larger install than other browsers) and, since then, I've always found that other browsers don't do stuff the way I'm used to Chrome doing them (picture slideshows, for example) so I end up going back to Chrome. Still surprised that Chrome hasn't historically worked with Android though. I would have thought that, like IE6 was designed for W95 or whatever, there'd always have been a version of Chrome that worked with the concurrent version of Android.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,921
|
Quote:
That's interesting too.
Must admit, I don't know a huge amount about Android and I guess that's the sort of thing I wouldn't notice on a quad core phone/tablet. Did read a bunch of reviews of browsers and Chrome always seems to do well so that's why I installed it (even though I did notice it was a much larger install than other browsers) and, since then, I've always found that other browsers don't do stuff the way I'm used to Chrome doing them (picture slideshows, for example) so I end up going back to Chrome. Still surprised that Chrome hasn't historically worked with Android though. I would have thought that, like IE6 was designed for W95 or whatever, there'd always have been a version of Chrome that worked with the concurrent version of Android. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11,501
|
Quote:
Hardly. Chrome is compatible with Android, just not very old versions of it.
If software developers made their apps compatible with every version since it first came out, they wouldn't be able to take advantage of the additional features in the later versions, and the apps would be highly constricted in what they could do. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newbury
Posts: 6,752
|
Quote:
Not a very old version. A version still sold installed on phones.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:50.


