• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
Four in a Bed :: New Series (Part 3)
<<
<
429 of 451
>>
>
sherisgirl
09-10-2015
Dont know why Derek stuck his nose in the air, doesnt him and his mrs live in one.
Those girls are really gettingon my wick now, Cushions, pictures
LucyDTrym
09-10-2015
Originally Posted by Ten_Ben:
“Not really sure why that should be any different to if it was a holiday cottage or anything else TBH.”

Well it woudnt be, i wasnt actually saying that. How many people who rent out a caravan or cottages in the busy season clean the tops of cupboards....its not important, i would much rather have clean fridge etc and bathroom.
ewoodie
09-10-2015
Originally Posted by Ten_Ben:
“I hope the participants were given clear instructions on how to judge making the payments. It's a bit difficult to pay £300 for somewhere when that's based on (say) six people and a three night minimum, when there's only one or two of you there for a single night.

If they're not all thinking along similar lines and using the same criteria the payments are going to be all over the place, surely?”

Interesting point! And applicable on every 4IAB! How do they calculate what they pay when the accommodation is for 6 and there are only 2 people at most?

Originally Posted by SolarSail:
“No. That's Steph Parker. I can see the similarity too, but they're totally different people.


Which is probably what the production team want to put the cat amongst the pigeons.

It'll be interesting.
It's supposed to be 'Value for Money'
Well, if you have the funds available, then I don't think £48 per night is a good spend on Park Farm's tents.
Six times it uses the word 'luxury' on the front page of their website. It also talks about 'glamping'
£48 is not a lot of money, especially when split between a family, but to me they certainly don't offer ever a hint of luxury. What they have there is the most basic provision for camping and I'd rather put the £48 towards something else.

If people knock a couple of quid off Derek's charges then the way the totals are calculated, that's going to be a bigger percentage than a fiver off the more expensive venues.

On the other hand, over a couple of hundred a night they run the risk of much bigger underpayments.”

Value for money is very subjective. For me, none of this week's places have been luxury. A tent in a field is not luxury. The lodges were nice but for that sort of money, I'd rather go to Centre Parks. The accommodation there is designed so that you never really see your neighbours.
ewoodie
09-10-2015
Originally Posted by sherisgirl:
“Dont know why Derek stuck his nose in the air, doesnt him and his mrs live in one.
Those girls are really gettingon my wick now, Cushions, pictures”

It looked like it!
SolarSail
09-10-2015
Originally Posted by ewoodie:
“...For me, none of this week's places have been luxury.”

Nor for me.
My ghast is flabbered that they think they're selling luxury or 'glamorous' camping at Park Farm, or indeed any of the other properties this week. However, I think we do have to concede that some forms of camping offer a lot more in the way of comfort than others. I suppose a private toilet within your own pitch is a lot more luxurious than a trek across a field to a communal block and that's not the half of it.

Layer Marney offered a lot of nice touches and against their competition I think they could say they were offering luxury and relative privacy for campers. but still not for me I'm afraid.

I'm really interested to hear the comments and see how it all pans out later today.
HumptyDumpy
09-10-2015
Good evening everyone!
anyonefortennis
09-10-2015
Hello campers. Here we go. Payment day.
anyonefortennis
09-10-2015
Yesterdays host reminds me of Giles Brandreth.
2shy2007
09-10-2015
LOATHE these daily recaps, 5 minutes wasted on them.
rhumble
09-10-2015
looking back on the first one,, it really does look awful
2shy2007
09-10-2015
The hut was lacking , it needed proper electric and also some better dinnerware.
HumptyDumpy
09-10-2015
Why not put a futon bed in there instead of a camp bed? Doubt children find them comfortable either.
rhumble
09-10-2015
I would probably under pay by about £50 tbh
2shy2007
09-10-2015
Originally Posted by rhumble:
“I would probably under pay by about £50 tbh”

Me too, far too much for a tent, £50 - £60 would be more realistic.
anyonefortennis
09-10-2015
Derek Nice not so nice.
2shy2007
09-10-2015
This was the one with the filthy toilet.
HumptyDumpy
09-10-2015
Originally Posted by 2shy2007:
“This was the one with the filthy toilet.”

Thankfully they didn't show it in the recaps.
2shy2007
09-10-2015
Originally Posted by HumptyDumpy:
“Thankfully they didn't show it in the recaps.”

Thank goodness!
rhumble
09-10-2015
and these tents are even worse
HumptyDumpy
09-10-2015
Is he trying to say that his clients are too dirty for cotton covered mattresses?

p.s. Hospital beds are some of the comfiest I have slept in.
HumptyDumpy
09-10-2015
Oh wow, full payments throughout. I guess that place is good value for money.
anyonefortennis
09-10-2015
Looks like Derek is going to win unless someone over pays one of the others which is highly unlikely in Dereks case.
rhumble
09-10-2015
£48 a night for a tent, its about the same as a comfortable room at a travel lodge , you would really need to be a huge fan of camping to pay that, i doubt back packers would find that value for money either
BellaRosa
09-10-2015
Originally Posted by anyonefortennis:
“Looks like Derek is going to win unless someone over pays one of the others which is highly unlikely in Dereks case.”

Looks like he will

Bet he has underpaid the two remaining couples.
SolarSail
09-10-2015
Amber's pricing and comment is just nuts. One comfy double bed and then they usually have four children on those tiny camp efforts.

I really don't think so.
<<
<
429 of 451
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map