Wow overpayment.
Four in a Bed :: New Series (Part 3)
431 of 451
Originally Posted by rhumble:
“Thats exactly what i thought tbh
, a bit like that woman the other week charging a lot of money to pay for her sons Boarding school”
“Thats exactly what i thought tbh
, a bit like that woman the other week charging a lot of money to pay for her sons Boarding school”
That's the only reason why most of them on this show with big homes run B&B's and sites like these.
Originally Posted by HumptyDumpy:
“Whilst her daughter was sleeping with the horses in the stable”
“Whilst her daughter was sleeping with the horses in the stable
”
lol , poor Freya 
Didn't see that coming!!
£28 , he knew they were a threat as it was clean, tidy and comfy. nasty old git wins with the others.
He is so desperate to win.Ghastly man.
I think the brother and sister were the nicest couple this week.
I think the brother and sister were the nicest couple this week.
Originally Posted by 2shy2007:
“£28 , he knew they were a threat as it was clean, tidy and comfy. nasty old git wins with the others.”
“£28 , he knew they were a threat as it was clean, tidy and comfy. nasty old git wins with the others.”
I knew he was a game player
Originally Posted by dome:
“He is so desperate to win.Ghastly man.
I think the brother and sister were the nicest couple this week.”
“He is so desperate to win.Ghastly man.
I think the brother and sister were the nicest couple this week.”
I think they were all players this week.
Originally Posted by dome:
“
I think the brother and sister were the nicest couple this week.”
“
I think the brother and sister were the nicest couple this week.”
I would say that ghastly knitwear couple were the nicest. They certainly tried to appreciate each place for what it was and weren't comparing them to what they offer.
Originally Posted by japara:
“In this day and age why don't people do something about missing teeth?”
“In this day and age why don't people do something about missing teeth?”
There'a a gap in the market for it.
Originally Posted by HumptyDumpy:
“I would say that ghastly knitwear couple were the nicest. They certainly tried to appreciate each place for what it was and weren't comparing them to what they offer.”
“I would say that ghastly knitwear couple were the nicest. They certainly tried to appreciate each place for what it was and weren't comparing them to what they offer.”
I agree with you.
How did Essex place arrive at that nightly cost? I just had a look and you can book a whole week in two weeks time, for six people for £649.
Originally Posted by HumptyDumpy:
“How did Essex place arrive at that nightly cost? I just had a look and you can book a whole week in two weeks time, for six people for £649.”
“How did Essex place arrive at that nightly cost? I just had a look and you can book a whole week in two weeks time, for six people for £649.”
The rates are always based on peak times.
I think Nick and Sheila's prices will be set by the company they're in partnership with. Maybe the original prices were in euros and so the conversion came up with an odd 67p when the prices were first worked out?
Amber paid everyone on the money and so did Sheila and Nick apart from the overpayment to Foxhunter.
Derek's £28 underpayment was absolutely outrageous and I didn't hear his justification for it - because he couldn't justify it. Between £5-£10 off for his cleaning issue would've been adequate.
Whatever he was going on about the hosting was most likely a chip on his shoulder I reckon and it was irrelevant to the pricing anyway as none of the guests would even encounter Jane or Russell at the holiday park.
Edit: just looked and the franchise partner dosn't look European after all so forget the 67p comment. No idea
Amber paid everyone on the money and so did Sheila and Nick apart from the overpayment to Foxhunter.
Derek's £28 underpayment was absolutely outrageous and I didn't hear his justification for it - because he couldn't justify it. Between £5-£10 off for his cleaning issue would've been adequate.
Whatever he was going on about the hosting was most likely a chip on his shoulder I reckon and it was irrelevant to the pricing anyway as none of the guests would even encounter Jane or Russell at the holiday park.
Edit: just looked and the franchise partner dosn't look European after all so forget the 67p comment. No idea
Wonder why the friend from the first place had so much more to say and was more forward than the actual owner?
Originally Posted by anyonefortennis:
“The rates are always based on peak times.”
“The rates are always based on peak times.”
But even they peek rate is £1399 for one week, in May, which is £199 per night. Surely conversion rates can't prices up by that much?
Originally Posted by HumptyDumpy:
“But even they peek rate is £1399 for one week, in May, which is £199 per night. Surely conversion rates can't prices up by that much?”
“But even they peek rate is £1399 for one week, in May, which is £199 per night. Surely conversion rates can't prices up by that much?”
Is this the tudor place?
Originally Posted by anyonefortennis:
“Is this the tudor place?”
“Is this the tudor place?”
Yes. And the price per tent doesn't change on the amount of people staying.
Originally Posted by HumptyDumpy:
“Yes. And the price per tent doesn't change on the amount of people staying.”
“Yes. And the price per tent doesn't change on the amount of people staying.”
Maybe they reduced their prices since the show aired.
431 of 451
