I think the right 2 were in the dance off - they are both lovely people but definitely the weakest dancers.

Was the result right? It's all a matter of opinion and taste, as I don't think there was much to separate them. For me - overall - Fiona was the better dancer, but Mark the better performer [who I think could dance a lot better if Iveta stopped treating him as the comedy act].

So who I have voted to keep in? Probably Fiona except I feel she had no more to give (she hasn't really improved since the start) and she looked as if she had had enough and actually wanted to go. If I was a judge and knew that before the DO I would have taken that into consideration.

People will be grateful if there turns out to be a Mark vs Ashley / Abbey / Ben dance off rather than one against Fiona.

Mark will be much easier to justify getting rid of.

Nah, the way the voting is going Mark will win it.

But... but... that was Dave. And his potential was that of a dalek on a zimmer frame with no sense of rhythm.

I see what people are saying but surely there's enough evidence now for people to realise that the dance off exists for the judges to get rid of whomever they like for whatever reason they like.

This week - "I have to vote on the dance off so..."
Next week - "It was close and x has been the better dancer throughout so..."
The week after - "y pinched my parking space and farted in my dressing room so..."