• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
I'm 34 Brendan!
<<
<
3 of 5
>>
>
Spin turn
18-11-2013
Originally Posted by Sally Mander2:
“It was a crime against humanity and Brendan should be severely punished to an inch of his life and sent to that penal colony across the other side of the globe. Sophie will surely need counselling for several years in order to recover. And while we are at it, Natalie should also be severely punished for receiving higher marks for her Charleston compared to Sophie, while in possession of a vertebral column that may not be fit for purpose.”

. I love your posts Sally. Shame there are not more like you.
PinkPetunia
18-11-2013
Go Sophie , Brendan was so patronising and came across as a right prat .
millie3
18-11-2013
I didn't really notice that comment but he is becoming nauseating with his comments about Sophie. I prefer the relationships where there's a bit of banter rather than him fawning (sp) all over her.
holly berry
18-11-2013
Just imagine being on the receiving end of someone gushing all over you in that over-weening patronising way at every opportunity. Makes my skin crawl and makes me like Sophie more and Brendan less lol.
Heavenly
18-11-2013
I really like Sophie and after that Charleston, I was really excited for her and I liked her partnership with Brendan but I have gone right off him again. His bleating on ITT when marks didn't go his way - Sophie looks uncomfortable a lot of the time - he needs to learn when to keep it shut.
penelopesimpson
18-11-2013
Originally Posted by holly berry:
“Just imagine being on the receiving end of someone gushing all over you in that over-weening patronising way at every opportunity. Makes my skin crawl and makes me like Sophie more and Brendan less lol.”

Well, he can come and gush all over me anytime he wants. He is fab.
MJS
18-11-2013
Originally Posted by Mrs BBV:
“I think she's a lot calmer than she was and she certainly very popular amongst the SCD family.”

She may be popular with her fellow contestants, but I don't think she's a favourite with the judges, nor the camera crew.

The judges seem to mark her down for the slightest thing, then mark up others who may have made the exact same error in their dancing. And as for camera shots, I don't think she gets so many as most of the others.
Mr Cellophane
18-11-2013
Originally Posted by guestofseth:
“Same here, those who dislike Brendan, and want there to be trouble between them, will see what they want to see. I just saw it as a little joke between them.”

BIB - I think this is true of many comments about Strictly.

Three examples:

Ben - somebody (a self styled expert) commented that he was executing quite competent dance moves on Saturday; I saw a big bloke lumbering about with a frenetic pole dancer twirling around him

Susannah - more than one person has stated that she was just stomping around and gurning; I saw a terrific dramatic Paso in which Susannah played her part extremely well (but KFG deserves huge credit for the work he has done with her.)

Natalie - 3 of the judges saw perfection; I saw a pretty forgettable Charleston with poor timing.

But I suppose if we all agreed that we just see what we want to see, this forum wouldn't have a lot to talk about!
Button62
18-11-2013
Brendan can't help shoehorning in these gushy over the top speeches when either he is desperate for votes or the dance hasn't gone as well as he hoped. Usually he gets away with it but he was floundering badly on Saturday night and I think more people saw it for what it was. He made himself look a right pillock and ended up just bouncing on the spot like a bunny having a breakdown.

I'm sure Sophie was only joking but the tedium of being called " his girl " or " my girl " must have got to her.
aggs
18-11-2013
Originally Posted by Button62:
“Brendan can't help shoehorning in these gushy over the top speeches when either he is desperate for votes or the dance hasn't gone as well as he hoped. Usually he gets away with it but he was floundering badly on Saturday night and I think more people saw it for what it was. He made himself look a right pillock and ended up just bouncing on the spot like a bunny having a breakdown.

I'm sure Sophie was only joking but the tedium of being called " his girl " or " my girl " must have got to her.”

It was probably the 'little girl' that made the 34 year old mum of 3 think - hold on
SCD-Observer
18-11-2013
Originally Posted by earthling13:
“Sophie and Brendan were just on Daybreak and she came over as somewhat less than enthusiastic. I don't know if that means anything though as I find her quite hard to warm to anyway.”

She is not a morning person?
Heavenly
18-11-2013
Originally Posted by Button62:
“Brendan can't help shoehorning in these gushy over the top speeches when either he is desperate for votes or the dance hasn't gone as well as he hoped. Usually he gets away with it but he was floundering badly on Saturday night and I think more people saw it for what it was.

He made himself look a right pillock and ended up just bouncing on the spot like a bunny having a breakdown.”

This. ^^
GibsonGirl
18-11-2013
I wonder if Sophie's husband might have something to do with the lack of chemistry. In one of the training videos a while ago, he seemed uncomfortable with Brendan holding Sophie in a more intimate way and even said something like do you need to hold her that way?

Do you think her husband has put his foot down and doesn't want Sophie and Brendan developing any kind of relationship?
Jan2555*GG*
18-11-2013
Gosh Brendan has got very worthy & preachy this year. He never misses an opportunity to drone on. Sophie's interjection was perfectly timed & much needed. It was her version of 'whatever'
Becky_B
18-11-2013
Originally Posted by SCD-Observer:
“Grown women referred to men (slightly younger than them) as boys too. Zoe is one such case. ”

Do you think this happens even 1% as often?
fridgesoup
18-11-2013
Originally Posted by Button62:
“Brendan can't help shoehorning in these gushy over the top speeches when either he is desperate for votes or the dance hasn't gone as well as he hoped. Usually he gets away with it but he was floundering badly on Saturday night and I think more people saw it for what it was. He made himself look a right pillock and ended up just bouncing on the spot like a bunny having a breakdown.

I'm sure Sophie was only joking but the tedium of being called " his girl " or " my girl " must have got to her.”

Originally Posted by aggs:
“It was probably the 'little girl' that made the 34 year old mum of 3 think - hold on ”

Tee hee! When he started speaking I was already squirming on his behalf . Good on Sophie for putting a pin in his balloon (affectionately or otherwise ). I think Brendan sees himself as a bit of an 'elder statesman' amongst the pros and wants to say something profound or make these grand gesture speeches on everyone's behalf. Sadly he's not very eloquent and just affles and caffles and makes himself a bit ridiculous. Funny though
SCD-Observer
18-11-2013
Originally Posted by Becky_B:
“Do you think this happens even 1% as often?”

Karen from The Apprentice talked about 'the boys'.

Abbey in the week one show before her waltz talked about the 'hot one from the boys' if I recalled.

I am sure Claudia did the same during her stint in ITT...

Real life examples I have heard it. But how can I prove it here?
fridgesoup
18-11-2013
Originally Posted by Becky_B:
“Do you think this happens even 1% as often?”

Originally Posted by SCD-Observer:
“Karen from The Apprentice talked about 'the boys'.

Abbey in the week one show before her waltz talked about the 'hot one from the boys' if I recalled.

I am sure Claudia did the same during her stint in ITT...

Real life examples I have heard it. But how can I prove it here?”

I think it happens all the time both ways. If it feels more patronising going in one direction, it's probably to do with the (perceived) balance of power in society at large or in a particular group (in the sense that it's hard to patronise someone of higher 'status' unless you know their achilles heel). In Brendan's case though, 'girls' might have been fine but little girls was just plain cringe. (And boys as an afterthought when he realised he'd gone down a silly path and couldn't go back )
PinkPetunia
18-11-2013
Originally Posted by SCD-Observer:
“Karen from The Apprentice talked about 'the boys'.

Abbey in the week one show before her waltz talked about the 'hot one from the boys' if I recalled.

I am sure Claudia did the same during her stint in ITT...

Real life examples I have heard it. But how can I prove it here?”

Did they use the term little boys ? Then Brendan called her his little girl .
Becky_B
18-11-2013
Originally Posted by fridgesoup:
“I think it happens all the time both ways. If it feels more patronising going in one direction, it's probably to do with the (perceived) balance of power in society at large or in a particular group (in the sense that it's hard to patronise someone of higher 'status' unless you know their achilles heel). In Brendan's case though, 'girls' might have been fine but little girls was just plain cringe. (And boys as an afterthought when he realised he'd gone down a silly path and couldn't go back )”


There is no (perceived) about it.

This is just a silly show and a silly man of course, but don't for an instant think it's always silliness.
SCD-Observer
18-11-2013
Originally Posted by PinkPetunia:
“Did they use the term little boys ? Then Brendan called her his little girl .”

I don't disagree "little girl" is OTT?

I was originally responding to peeve's post:

Originally Posted by peeve:
“I have absolutely no idea about their relationship and (I'd hazard a guess) neither does anybody else on this forum. Sophie has a dry wit, as she's demonstrated with other comments both on the main show and on It Takes Two. To my mind, it sounded as if she was irritated at being referred to as a 'girl' when Brendan was gushing about the pro dancers 'looking after their little girls' in a rather patronising way.

I hate it when men refer to grown women as 'girls' and probably Sophie does, too. Doesn't mean to say they don't get on otherwise, though.”

fridgesoup
18-11-2013
Originally Posted by Becky_B:
“There is no (perceived) about it.

This is just a silly show and a silly man of course, but don't for an instant think it's always silliness.”

BIB That depends on the society or sub-group and who's doing the perceiving . I have a friend who maintains it's impossible to be patronised unless you allow yourself to be - as in, if you feel no inequality or inadequacy, other people may look down their noses at you or attempt to diminish you, but if you're confident and care not what they think, it's irrelevant. I don't entirely agree, but it's an interesting perspective
Becky_B
18-11-2013
Originally Posted by fridgesoup:
“BIB That depends on the society or sub-group . I have a friend who maintains it's impossible to be patronised unless you allow yourself to be - as in, if you feel no inequality or inadequacy, other people may look down their noses at you or attempt to diminish you, but if you're confident and care not what they think, it's irrelevant. I don't entirely agree, but it's an interesting perspective”

I don't agree either.
But then my experience is not positive... and that feels more like being blamed for it.


Actually i can't even find the words for what i'm trying to say. It's just not as simple as your friend seems to suggest.
fridgesoup
18-11-2013
Originally Posted by Becky_B:
“I don't agree either.
But then my experience is not positive... and that feels more like being blamed for it.


Actually i can't even find the words for what i'm trying to say. It's just not as simple as your friend seems to suggest.”

I'm sorry you've had a bad experience . I've probably oversimplified what she means (and as I say, it isn't my view, but I think there's something in it worth thinking about). So if someone makes a patronising remark, it doesn't mean they are not being mean or rude and that you have no reason to be offended, but that if you feel diminished by what they say, that comes from your own view of yourself or your own sensitivities. A bit harsh, perhaps, and I daresay, depends very much on the situation and the people .... (If someone knows just where to stick the knife in to deliberately make a person feel inadequate, they're doing something much nastier than being patronising imo ).
SCD-Observer
18-11-2013
Originally Posted by fridgesoup:
“I'm sorry you've had a bad experience . I've probably oversimplified what she means (and as I say, it isn't my view, but I think there's something in it worth thinking about). So if someone makes a patronising remark, it doesn't mean they are not being mean or rude and that you have no reason to be offended, but that if you feel diminished by what they say, that comes from your own view of yourself or your own sensitivities. A bit harsh, perhaps, and I daresay, depends very much on the situation and the people .... (If someone knows just where to stick the knife in to deliberately make a person feel inadequate, they're doing something much nastier than being patronising imo ).”

Not saying this applies in Sophie's case, but I agree with your explanation (with some teeny reservations). My dad (bless his soul) always told me "don't let them get you no matter what they say". Wise words...
<<
<
3 of 5
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map