Originally Posted by TheWireRules:
“It's funny those who knock DWTS always say they've only seen a "few" clips. These are the facts:-
More dance content on DWTS.
infinitely more variation of, and traditional music.
Yes some are quite flashy and showy but that's what ours as become with all the props etc. Indeed these ideas were taken from DWTS.
Ratings are down from it's heyday but they aren't tumbling, plus there is the twice a year overkill.
To claim ours is more real ballroom dancing and DWTS isn't is just wrong, indeed scratch the surface and the opposite is true.
SCD's ballroom dances need flashing up a bit anyway a lot are very repetitive and boring.”

Something got lost in translation. I wasn't knocking DWTS, just commenting on reports that ratings were down, while ratings for Strictly are up. Are those reports wrong?
Nor did I ever say that Strictly has 'more real ballroom dancing'. Actually, I agree with you, hence my saying that Strictly is meeting
viewers' needs rather than those of dance aficionados (who are always moaning on this forum about Strictly dumbing down and not doing enough of the dance in hold, etc, ad nauseam).
My point is that if Strictly is doing so well in terms of viewing figures, it has no need to copy what its offspring is doing across the pond, eg introduce a classical week. Maybe there isn't a direct correlation between the gimmicks on DWTS and its falling ratings, but if I were producing Strictly, I wouldn't take that chance.