DS Forums

 
 

Apple claim its Samsungs fault that Apple are no longer seen as a Great Innovator


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24-11-2013, 10:06
Anika Hanson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 14,219
The V3 was another one of my early smartphones.
Anika Hanson is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 24-11-2013, 10:34
alanwarwic
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
..
So I'll stand by what I said, I think the iPhone is the worlds best selling phone. ..
Actually it is more likely the Samsung or even more likely the Nokia.
BTW there is no one 'IPhone and no one 'Samsung'.

That low end 5c, bar the LTE looks cheaper to make than the Moto G. Its just happens to be part of the Apple/iPhone range.
alanwarwic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-2013, 10:44
kidspud
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11,501
Sadly some people think Apple not only invented the smartphone but they have to be the biggest sellers too

Sadly they are mistaken
Well I'm not sure about others but I've never claimed apple invented the smartphone and I've never read in here anyone who thinks that. I assume you are talking about this forum.

However, I do accept that the Nokia has sold more, I had never even heard of the phone.

The razr I do not consider a smartphone, but I'm sure others will.
kidspud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-2013, 10:47
calico_pie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9,428
Funny how you need definitive proof for everything except where the iphone is concerned, then it is always "it seems perfectly reasonable to assume" or some such assumption
I guess all we can hope for is a bit of common sense.
calico_pie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-2013, 10:51
kidspud
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11,501
Actually it is more likely the Samsung or even more likely the Nokia.
BTW there is no one 'IPhone and no one 'Samsung'.

That low end 5c, bar the LTE looks cheaper to make than the Moto G. Its just happens to be part of the Apple/iPhone range.
As usual, I really don't know what you are talking about.

I don't have a clue how much the 5c, Moro G or any other phone cost to make. What I'm fairly sure of is you don't either.

I'm not sure why you even brought it up. I assume it is to divert away from your reticular racism claim, like your friend.
kidspud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-2013, 10:53
calico_pie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9,428
In the same news, CP complicates the post and adds arms and legs on to it along with multiple questions. Do you have nothing better to do?...

Favouritism whether you like it or not played a huge part in this case. Maybe not the only reason they won. They did pinch a thing or 2 but who doesnt? Apple are guilty of pinching most of the stuff they have right from other OS's.
You mention "arms and legs" a lot, but really just seems to be anything you don't like or agree with.

So a lawyer made every attempt to show his/her client in a favourable light.

Why on earth is that surprising or noteworthy? Its their job!

Saying that "favouritism" helped win them the case makes no sense here - presumably Samsung's lawyer's favoured Samsung, so it all cancels out.

If you want to talk about favouritism affecting the outcome, you would really need to somehow demonstrate that, I dunno, the judge showed inappropriate favouritism to one side or the other.

And I don't see how my saying that is somehow complicating anything.
calico_pie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-2013, 10:54
calico_pie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9,428
Sadly some people think Apple not only invented the smartphone but they have to be the biggest sellers too

Sadly they are mistaken
Actually, I think its more the case that some people just like to think that other people think things.
calico_pie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-2013, 11:00
alanwarwic
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
As usual, I really don't know what you are talking about....
Work it out, do the maths.
Seems obvious to me that the higher resolution quad core Moto G c/w a big battery costs more to make.

And seemingly they both cut costs by robbing the user from having a pop in battery.
So more backwards innovation there!
alanwarwic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-2013, 11:27
kidspud
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11,501
Work it out, do the maths.
Seems obvious to me that the higher resolution quad core Moto G c/w a big battery costs more to make.

And seemingly they both cut costs by robbing the user from having a pop in battery.
So more backwards innovation there!
What maths and what seems obvious?

You give me the numbers (I'll be intrigued how you value things) and I'll add it up for you.
kidspud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-2013, 11:59
swordman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,342
However, I do accept that the Nokia has sold more, I had never even heard of the phone.

The razr I do not consider a smartphone, but I'm sure others will.
Your your lack of knowledge never surprise me
swordman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-2013, 12:02
swordman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,342
I guess all we can hope for is a bit of common sense.
I think your last rant about the 4s and sales shows it is a vainhope
swordman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-2013, 12:08
kidspud
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11,501
Your your lack of knowledge never surprise me
So you knew about the Nokia then? Strange, you never mentioned it before

Your lack of integrity never surprises me.
kidspud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-2013, 12:26
swordman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,342
Better not say too much or I will have CP jumping in to defend your honour
swordman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-2013, 13:00
calico_pie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9,428
I think your last rant about the 4s and sales shows it is a vainhope
There was no rant.

kidspud mentioned something about the 4S outselling the 5.

qasdfdsaq quoted the 4S figure of 16.7m which appeared to dispute that.

That figure of 16.7m is incorrect.

No rant, no absence of common sense.

What's the ADC that you keep referring to by the way?
calico_pie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-2013, 13:01
calico_pie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9,428
Better not say too much or I will have CP jumping in to defend your honour
Referencing something another rooster said to (attempt to) lear up whatever confusion there was is not defending anyone.
calico_pie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-2013, 13:20
kidspud
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11,501
Better not say too much or I will have CP jumping in to defend your honour
You never say too much. You pretty much say nothing.

Actually, you did make that ludicrous stance about racism, but you moved off of that pretty quick.
kidspud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-2013, 13:29
swordman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,342
Nice to see you two posting together and singing from the same hymn sheet.

Anything left to contribute to this thread then pretty much all you have said has embarrassed you
swordman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-2013, 13:37
kidspud
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11,501
Nice to see you two posting together and singing from the same hymn sheet.

Anything left to contribute to this thread then pretty much all you have said has embarrassed you
Is it lonely having no one agree with you?

Even all your friends dismissed your silly racism rant, even the one who started it in the first place
kidspud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-2013, 13:40
calico_pie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9,428
Nice to see you two posting together and singing from the same hymn sheet.

Anything left to contribute to this thread then pretty much all you have said has embarrassed you
So if more than one person happens to disagree with you, its some sort of club, where the people are in some sort of cahoots together?

Whereas if anyone agrees with you its what? Just two people who happen to share the same views?

Just another day, and another hilarious double standard.
calico_pie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-2013, 14:36
alanwarwic
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
I think we all have that same hymn sheet in that the iPhone sells massive in the US, and has by far the highest profit margin in the business.
alanwarwic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-2013, 14:56
swordman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,342
So if more than one person happens to disagree with you, its some sort of club, where the people are in some sort of cahoots together?
sorry i am finding it all very confusing with whose turn it is out of you two to reply.
swordman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-2013, 15:08
kidspud
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11,501
I think we all have that same hymn sheet in that the iPhone sells massive in the US, and has by far the highest profit margin in the business.
They sell more phones outside of the US than in it, which is hardly surprising.
kidspud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-2013, 15:40
Stiggles
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Posts: 9,293
You mention "arms and legs" a lot, but really just seems to be anything you don't like or agree with.

So a lawyer made every attempt to show his/her client in a favourable light.

Why on earth is that surprising or noteworthy? Its their job!

Saying that "favouritism" helped win them the case makes no sense here - presumably Samsung's lawyer's favoured Samsung, so it all cancels out.

If you want to talk about favouritism affecting the outcome, you would really need to somehow demonstrate that, I dunno, the judge showed inappropriate favouritism to one side or the other.

And I don't see how my saying that is somehow complicating anything.
Its all these daft paragraphs you write one after the other in a vain attempt to make it look like you know what you are talking about. I don't need to demonstrate anything since a child could see what was happening here in this case.

Why pick on Samsung? Why haven't apple been sued for taking the idea of making a phone? Why is it anywhere else in the world apple have had their cases thrown out? Yet 15 mins down the road from Apple HQ, they win close to a billion dollars when apple themselves are guilty of stealing nearly everything they do!

Its incredible.
Stiggles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-2013, 15:44
Zack06
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 27,438
Its all these daft paragraphs you write one after the other in a vain attempt to make it look like you know what you are talking about. I don't need to demonstrate anything. A child could see what was happening here in this case.
Zack06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-2013, 15:45
Stiggles
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Posts: 9,293
Well I'm not sure about others but I've never claimed apple invented the smartphone and I've never read in here anyone who thinks that. I assume you are talking about this forum.

However, I do accept that the Nokia has sold more, I had never even heard of the phone.

The razr I do not consider a smartphone, but I'm sure others will.
Oh there are many people here and elsewhere who claim apple invented the smartphone.
Stiggles is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:54.