|
||||||||
Apple claim its Samsungs fault that Apple are no longer seen as a Great Innovator |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#76 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9,423
|
So the only thing that was new was a much improved user experience.
I think it's a left brain / right brain thing where the more technically minded don't place much importance on that because that's not how their wired. Just as more creative types can get bamboozled by more technical, mathematical stuff. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 30,072
|
Quote:
So the only thing that was new was a much improved user experience.
I think it's a left brain / right brain thing where the more technically minded don't place much importance on that because that's not how their wired. Just as more creative types can get bamboozled by more technical, mathematical stuff. Creative types can get bamboozled by maths? |
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the future....
Posts: 11,257
|
Quote:
So the only thing that was new was a much improved user experience.
I think it's a left brain / right brain thing where the more technically minded don't place much importance on that because that's not how their wired. Just as more creative types can get bamboozled by more technical, mathematical stuff. ![]() "I think therefore iPhone"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9,423
|
Quote:
Wow, what an incredible statement.
Creative types can get bamboozled by maths? Quote:
Your posts never cease to amuse me
![]() "I think therefore iPhone" ![]() Another difference, albeit a sweeping generalisation, is the way some people take things too literally at the expense of a general point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11,493
|
Quote:
The only new thing about the iPhone was the capacitive multi-touch display.
Everything else was done before, especially the design and in fact the iPhone was missing features upon its initial release. On that basis, I'm now wondering if any phone company has ever shown any innovation. I looked at the Sony Ericsson referenced on here and I can see nothing that had not already been done before, so I assume that had no innovation in it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dumfries
Posts: 38,495
|
Quote:
I wouldn't have said they were "dross". I was disagreeing with your suggestion that there was nothing particularly new, different or innovative in the iPhone.
And I haven't spent several hours trying to do anything - more like minutes. The app' store could possibly be seen as an innovation too, if it wasn't for the fact that the restrictions it placed on the user made it a benefit and a hindrance in equal measures. |
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 27,438
|
Quote:
So the only thing that was new was a much improved user experience.
I think it's a left brain / right brain thing where the more technically minded don't place much importance on that because that's not how their wired. Just as more creative types can get bamboozled by more technical, mathematical stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
|
Quote:
By introductions the multitouch display they completely changed the way we interact with the device...
Fact was that success of the iPod meant Apple could price them high enough to sell. That simply happens with everything with the also once expensive LCD TV being a case in point. With phones,maybe Apple look like 'a little boy with a finger in the dike'. Is/was anyone claiming ownership of TVs like Apple are with phones? |
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kilburn, NW London
Posts: 1,240
|
Apple, in 2020 we will look back on them "fondly" and remember the letter I
|
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9,423
|
Quote:
This post seems like a no brain thing.
![]() I honestly think that principle explains a lot about these sorts of discussions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 359
|
I don't know why people get so defensive about these company's. They only care about profits at the end of the day.
Apple are not ripping off so many mobile phone buyers these days, so that has to be a good thing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Londres, Tierra del Fuego
Posts: 12,952
|
Samsung do copy others. They copy Sony, they copy LG, they copy Apple, they copy everyone and everything. If they made food they'd copy McDonalds. It's what they do.
However, when the end result is that consumers get real choice rather than having to rely on one player what's the problem? As for Apple's reputation as innovators suffering, the narrative being peddled by the likes of Gartner, IDC, and Wall St. entities do far more on that score than Samsung does. IDC and Gartner even openly admit they add millions of completely imaginary sales as "white box" Android devices every quarter to skew the market share stats. What's the point of that unless to give the impression that iOS isn't doing as well as it actually is? |
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,286
|
Quote:
By introductions the multitouch display they completely changed the way we interact with the device including how the OS acted with the user, how information was displayed, the integration, etc, etc. if that isn't major innovation, I'm now wondering what posters expectations are.
Describe ONE thing that "completely changed". The only change I can think of is pinch zooming. Which we already had before on Windows in 2003. Tapping on an application icon to launch the app? Selecting a menu item by clicking on it? Clicking on an item to select it using your finger? Yep, completely new. Nobody had ever thought of that before the iPhone... |
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Posts: 9,292
|
Quote:
Samsung do copy others. They copy Sony, they copy LG, they copy Apple, they copy everyone and everything. If they made food they'd copy McDonalds. It's what they do.
However, when the end result is that consumers get real choice rather than having to rely on one player what's the problem? Quote:
As for Apple's reputation as innovators suffering, the narrative being peddled by the likes of Gartner, IDC, and Wall St. entities do far more on that score than Samsung does. IDC and Gartner even openly admit they add millions of completely imaginary sales as "white box" Android devices every quarter to skew the market share stats. What's the point of that unless to give the impression that iOS isn't doing as well as it actually is?
So it's all made up then? Is that what your saying?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11,493
|
Quote:
Really? Complete change?
Describe ONE thing that "completely changed". The only change I can think of is pinch zooming. Which we already had before on Windows in 2003. Tapping on an application icon to launch the app? Selecting a menu item by clicking on it? Clicking on an item to select it using your finger? Yep, completely new. Nobody had ever thought of that before the iPhone... Innovation is not invention. Posters keep referring to phones (and PDAs) which were around the same time as the iPhone release. Let someone suggest the best one they feel can be put alongside the iPhone on its release and let's see how it compares. However much people have a dislike for Apple, to deny they didn't innovation by introducing the iPhone is just plane silly. |
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
|
Quote:
Innovation is not invention..
e.g. Controlling the price of the cheap to make 5c is an innovative way to both maintain sales of the 5s and keep the premium perception. Yes, the prolific Apple use of the word 'innovation' is used to make us perceive it as 'invention'. I said from the start that these trials are part marketing. And some might now say that Apple simply wanted to halt evolution/innovation in smartphones, very much like Intel and MS managed to halt evolution in Netbooks. You could also debate whether Apple were more forced into rather than willingly launched that Mini Retina. |
|
|
|
|
|
#92 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9,423
|
Quote:
Anything is innovation if you want it to be.
e.g. Controlling the price of the cheap to make 5c is an innovative way to both maintain sales of the 5s and keep the premium perception. Yes, the prolific Apple use of the word 'innovation' is used to make us perceive it as 'invention'. I said from the start that these trials are part marketing. And some might now say that Apple simply wanted to halt evolution/innovation in smartphones, very much like Intel and MS managed to halt evolution in Netbooks. You could also debate whether Apple were more forced into rather than willingly launched that Mini Retina. Why on earth would Apple want to halt evolution/innovation in smartphones? It might not be in the form of new products or new designs (that isn't the definition of innovation either), but I think there's still plenty of evolution and innovation in Apple products. For all the talk about how the current iPhone is essentially unchanged from the original iPhone that sometimes crops up, put the two side by side and the difference is clearly night and day. And what do you mean "forced to launch the Mini Retina"? Why on earth wouldn't they have released one with the retina display? |
|
|
|
|
|
#93 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Crystal Palace TX
Posts: 19,702
|
Quote:
As has been said several times now "innovation" and "invention" are two different things. Just because yourself and others choose to wrongly interpret the word isn't Apple's fault.
Why on earth would Apple want to halt evolution/innovation in smartphones? It might not be in the form of new products or new designs (that isn't the definition of innovation either), but I think there's still plenty of evolution and innovation in Apple products. For all the talk about how the current iPhone is essentially unchanged from the original iPhone that sometimes crops up, put the two side by side and the difference is clearly night and day. And what do you mean "forced to launch the Mini Retina"? Why on earth wouldn't they have released one with the retina display? |
|
|
|
|
#94 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9,423
|
Sure, but I was just quoting Alan.
A good example of innovation in the new iPhone is the flash for the camera. Its not as headline grabbing as a new design, but I'd say its definitely innovative. But because its a relatively minor thing in the scheme of things it doesn't get any attention. I think away from all the media noise about Apple's lack of innovation, it does still exist, just not in ways that the media narrative might prefer. |
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,342
|
Apple are still innovating really?
Innovation is about meeting the needs and requirements that already exist and finding ways to meet them. If is not deciding what your willing to do and passing this of as new invention of innovation. For example Samsung realise there is a desire for larger screens bit not larger phones, solution bigger screen in a smaller phone. Apple know that most iPhone users want a larger screen, solution a different flash for the camera. Slight difference
|
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 3,291
|
Quote:
Sure, but I was just quoting Alan.
A good example of innovation in the new iPhone is the flash for the camera. Its not as headline grabbing as a new design, but I'd say its definitely innovative. But because its a relatively minor thing in the scheme of things it doesn't get any attention. I think away from all the media noise about Apple's lack of innovation, it does still exist, just not in ways that the media narrative might prefer. I've compared my 4S against an old 2nd gen Touch. And there really isn't a lot of difference at all. Nicer screen, faster processor. Thats about it. Overall usage, interface, etc. is pretty much identical. And of course Apple innovate in other ways. They produce OS updates that make old phones into a laggy clunky mess (iOS 7 on the 4 & 4S really doesn't work that well at all). |
|
|
|
|
|
#97 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 27,438
|
Quote:
Innovation is not invention. Posters keep referring to phones (and PDAs) which were around the same time as the iPhone release.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: S6 1SW WTID UTO FTB
Posts: 6,327
|
Quote:
You couldn't make this stuff up. Apple are attempting to get more Samsung products banned in the USA nothing new there. However its all Samsung's fault that people no longer see Apple as innovative!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#99 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,342
|
Quote:
That's funny...look what Apple said when they launched the iPhone.
![]() nothing grand about those claims
|
|
|
|
|
|
#100 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,716
|
LOL @ the Samsung shills on this forum.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:09.






