Originally Posted by lakes:
“The main plans in the green paper are
BBC governors to be abolished and a new trust established to "speak up" for the licence fee payer
Licence fee to remain - but a review will examine other funding methods
BBC told not to "play copycat" or "chase ratings for ratings sake"
More programmes to be made by independent companies
well the bit about BBC told not to "play copycat" or "chase ratings for ratings sake" is the end for any chance of a fa3”
The very bad news is that FA is used as the example of a copycat show in the reports. Obviously by people who never watched the two shows or Pop Idol - let alone livestreaming or BBC 3.
The whole thing is illogical though. Come-dancing Strictly revisited is quoted as an unique, new, BBC show but that just raises the question what iis new . Change the name and the coverage and FA could be just as new or unique as the Come Dancing spin off. The government spins the same old thing as something brand new all the time so a policy announcement that FA was not the old FA but a new, non-Pop Idol FA might be in order. Meanwhile Eastender's carries on as the BBC Coronation Street and Holby/Casualty carry on in mould of every ITV hospital show that came before.
The good news is that the new requirements include more educational and arts programmes - both of which FA is - especially if you show the coaching. The question is if the BBC is prepared to fight its corner and if necessary alter the format to emphasise its not Pop Idol.
Logic is on FA's side. A FA teaching session clearly meets the new requirement to foster the arts and creativity - i doubt if the BBC showed anything more creative than students interpreting songs in 2003 . The only alternative for music would be the sort of stuff the BBC showed in the 1950s with male voice choirs and orchestras warming up which the BBC stopped showing for the very good reason that no one watched. Bravery or imagination though isn't the first thing you expect from the BBC and it will be far easier for them to churn out rubbish that meets the minister's remit and then explain lack of audience by the new requirement not to chase audiences. No one watches, no one produces anything watchable but the government targets are all met - sounds very familiar.
If you win that battle to establish FA as not Pop Idol , logically FA would be a frontrunner for a BBC which according to the proposals would otherwise be stuffed with the sort of unwatchable self-indulgent nonsense currently consigned to BBC4 . If they don't find an interesting way , like FA, of meeting the remit they are just not going to have any audience at all - which will lead enormous numbers of people to ask why on earth they are paying for something they never watch. As the rest of the BBC loses audience, the size of the last FA audience could end up being very acceptable, As celeb FA also shows, FA is also an excellent and fairly cheap way of filling an awful lot of BBC1 and BBC3 hours which also ought to appeal to an organization strapped for money.
The logic is fine. The politics don't seem to have anything to do with logic or reality though.