DS Forums

 
 

Wouldn't It Be Better To Give Them Food W/O It Being Dependent on The Bushtucker?....


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 21-11-2013, 00:08
Styker
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 28,296

I'm so fed up every year that this show and BB too being so focused about food and that is what most of a "starving" camp of celebs go on about or think about and or are driven about!

Wouldn't it be better in order to get them more lively in general for them to be given good food and treats anyway without it being reliant on the Bushtucker trials and that they have to do the BT's and if they don't or say I'm A Celeb Get Me Outta Here, that they lose a significant part of their appearance fee and could end up losing it all?

Good alterntative idea huh?!
Styker is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 21-11-2013, 00:19
ROWLING2010
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Ravenclaw Common Room.
Posts: 3,631
I think the celebs would rather starve for a few weeks than ever give up even a pound of their appearance fee.
ROWLING2010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2013, 08:26
sarahj1986
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 8,093
No OP making the trials as a way of winning food must remain. It makes the more likely to complete the trial if its for food and hungry camp mates will tend to get more annoyed in situations. It is an entertainment show after all.
sarahj1986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2013, 08:38
duckylucky
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 10,247
The trials are the show .But they need to sort out the same person being voted all the time day in day out .
duckylucky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2013, 09:58
Dangermoose
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Shall I be the cat? =^..^=
Posts: 31,759
No, the whole point of the show is watching them suffer
Dangermoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2013, 14:24
Styker
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 28,296
No OP making the trials as a way of winning food must remain. It makes the more likely to complete the trial if its for food and hungry camp mates will tend to get more annoyed in situations. It is an entertainment show after all.
No, the whole point of the show is watching them suffer
But all we get as a result is celbs drianed, starving and focused mainly on food and talk of little else! How is that exiting?

If they were given food they would be much more lively, talk more about themselves and there careers and surely that is a large part of why we tune in to hope to see because if its about seeing them suffer in the trials, why not just use members of the public instead? Yeah they'd have to chage the name but I don't see the point in watching starving celebs who keep on going on about it.
Styker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2013, 14:32
Kim_Bolton
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 593
It would mess things up more if there were the 'haves' and 'have nots' now they're all in one group, with some looking on hungrily (and very, very resentfully) while others stuff their faces. Don't know how it could be done, but it would stir things up.
Kim_Bolton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2013, 14:34
priscilla
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: God didn't do this, devil did
Posts: 28,118
No, I like the current format of btt and food.
priscilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2013, 14:39
hyperstarsponge
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: North East
Posts: 12,254
They get food when they are not filming in the hotel.
hyperstarsponge is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2013, 15:53
sarahj1986
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Warwickshire
Posts: 8,093
But all we get as a result is celbs drianed, starving and focused mainly on food and talk of little else! How is that exiting?

If they were given food they would be much more lively, talk more about themselves and there careers and surely that is a large part of why we tune in to hope to see because if its about seeing them suffer in the trials, why not just use members of the public instead? Yeah they'd have to chage the name but I don't see the point in watching starving celebs who keep on going on about it.
if they get fed anyway the celebs will hardly do the trials, the trials cost quite a bit of money to do so I believe, they will want them completed as much as possible, else what's the point of them? . Its not fair for a celeb to lose part of their fee if they are picked by the public to do it.
sarahj1986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2013, 16:05
MattXfactor
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,125
Whether people like it or not the trials are a very essential concept of the show , as is campmates not having enough food if said trials aren't completed, the basis of the show would be somewhat lost if they didn't happen like they do now.
MattXfactor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-11-2013, 20:57
Styker
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 28,296
if they get fed anyway the celebs will hardly do the trials, the trials cost quite a bit of money to do so I believe, they will want them completed as much as possible, else what's the point of them? . Its not fair for a celeb to lose part of their fee if they are picked by the public to do it.
Like I said if they refuse to do the trials then they should cut their appearance fee say by up to 15% for every trial they refuse or pull out of.
Styker is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:43.