• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Doctor Who
Results:What did you think of the episode?
Excellent
546 (62.54%)
Good
193 (22.11%)
Average
76 (8.71%)
Bad
23 (2.63%)
Poor
35 (4.01%)
Voters: 873. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in?
Doctor Who: The Day of the Doctor. BBC1. 23/11/2013 19:50. Official Thread
<<
<
1 of 61
>>
>
saladfingers81
22-11-2013
The 23rd of November 2013.

The moment is almost upon us.

The day approaches.

Fifty glorious years leading to this.

The Day of the Doctor.
Muttley76
22-11-2013
Tomorrow is……

*dramatic drum roll*

The Day of the Doctor
November_Rain
22-11-2013
I'm so excited, and I just can't hide it.
LightAtTheEnd
22-11-2013
Better get to bed. Then it will only be one more sleep!
Ben_Freeman
22-11-2013
Off to cinema to watch this is there any news of anything extra at the cinema screening
TheSilentFez
22-11-2013
I was just about to make this thread, but apparently I've been beaten to it.
Anyway, I'll post this stuff:

Trailers:
BBC 1 Trailer
Extended Trailer
"50 Year" Trailer

Clips:
A Selection of short clips

Mini-episodes
Night of the Doctor
The Last Day

(Got my Jelly Babies and Fez at the ready. Can't wait! )
Babycakes15
22-11-2013
I'm so excited! Have the house to myself to watch it in peace. Pizza in the freezer, wine in the fridge and the dog will have a massive walk late afternoon so she'll sleep through it. Heaven!
The Gatherer
22-11-2013
Originally Posted by saladfingers81:
“The 23rd of November 2013.

The moment is almost upon us.

The day approaches.

Fifty glorious years leading to this.

The Day of the Doctor.”

1990-95, 1997-2004?? (And I would personally add 1986-1987, 2009-2013 (so far) to that list but this isn't the place to go over those arguments again! )
RickyBarby
22-11-2013
If you got work tomorrow and want it off give them this
Sladen
22-11-2013
Originally Posted by The Gatherer:
“1990-95, 1997-2004?? (And I would personally add 1986-1987, 2009-2013 (so far) to that list but this isn't the place to go over those arguments again! )”

And I'm not counting any time my TV was turned off, or anything that aired before I was born, either!

And you can't make me! Hummppphhh (grabbing suit jacket with both hands)
Will2911
22-11-2013
Originally Posted by The Gatherer:
“1990-95, 1997-2004?? (And I would personally add 1986-1987, 2009-2013 (so far) to that list but this isn't the place to go over those arguments again! )”

Lol, stop being such a pedant and enjoy yourself. Quibbling over dates is nonsense, it's 50 years since the first episode aired... That should be enough
Digital Sid
22-11-2013
Originally Posted by The Gatherer:
“1990-95, 1997-2004??”

The show didn't cease to exist during these periods, it was just off air. By that logic, last year wasn't the 50th anniversary of the Bond films, as films were only released 23 of those years, or the 125th anniversary of Sherlock Holmes, as Arthur Conan Doyle stopped writing them in 1927.
Will2911
22-11-2013
Originally Posted by Digital Sid:
“The show didn't cease to exist during these periods, it was just off air.”

Well not true, it was actually on air between 2009-13...
Digital Sid
22-11-2013
Originally Posted by Will2911:
“Well not true, it was actually on air between 2009-13...”

I was referring to the bit outside the bracket.
Will2911
22-11-2013
Maybe what we should do is this: Add up all the lengths of the episodes and see precisely how much footage of Doctor Who has actually been on the Telly. Then however long the total length of every episode combined is can be the number anniversary this is.
TheSilentFez
22-11-2013
Originally Posted by Will2911:
“Well not true, it was actually on air between 2009-13...”

I think he was trying to imply that he doesn't believe Doctor Who from 2009 to the present day can be counted for whatever reason...which is a totally ridiculous notion.
Will2911
22-11-2013
Originally Posted by TheSilentFez:
“I think he was trying to imply that he doesn't believe Doctor Who from 2009 to the present day can be counted for whatever reason...which is a totally ridiculous notion.”

I know what he was trying to imply. I just didn't wish to acknowledge it
DiscoP
22-11-2013
Originally Posted by TheSilentFez:
“I think he was trying to imply that he doesn't believe Doctor Who from 2009 to the present day can be counted for whatever reason...which is a totally ridiculous notion.”

I assume it's because The Gatherer doesn't like it much from 2009 onwards.

If that's how we're rolling then I'd personally like to jettison the Hinchcliffe era.
Will2911
22-11-2013
Originally Posted by DiscoP:
“I assume it's because The Gatherer doesn't like it much from 2009 onwards.

If that's how we're rolling then I'd personally like to jettison the Hinchcliffe era.”

If we're not counting the bits we don't like then I have a few years I think should be ditched too...
The Gatherer
22-11-2013
Originally Posted by Digital Sid:
“The show didn't cease to exist during these periods, it was just off air. By that logic, last year wasn't the 50th anniversary of the Bond films, as films were only released 23 of those years, or the 125th anniversary of Sherlock Holmes, as Arthur Conan Doyle stopped writing them in 1927.”

You've misunderstood my point. The original post said 50 "glorious" years. My response was that the years when the show was off air were not "glorious". I am not disputing that tomorrow is the 50th anniversary.
The Gatherer
22-11-2013
Originally Posted by TheSilentFez:
“I think he was trying to imply that he doesn't believe Doctor Who from 2009 to the present day can be counted for whatever reason...which is a totally ridiculous notion.”

Another misunderstanding. How difficult is it to read a post and the response to it?
The Gatherer
22-11-2013
Originally Posted by Will2911:
“I know what he was trying to imply. I just didn't wish to acknowledge it”

You obviously didn't.
TheSilentFez
22-11-2013
Originally Posted by The Gatherer:
“Another misunderstanding. How difficult is it to read a post and the response to it?”

Well if everyone else seems to have misunderstood then perhaps you should have put more thought into what you were writing.
The Gatherer
22-11-2013
Originally Posted by TheSilentFez:
“Well if everyone else seems to have misunderstood then perhaps you should have put more thought into what you were writing.”

Seems pretty clear to me. Just re-read post 8.
DiscoP
22-11-2013
Originally Posted by The Gatherer:
“Another misunderstanding. How difficult is it to read a post and the response to it?”

There is a school of thought that if ever there is a miscommunication then it is the fault of the person communicating the message rather than those who are receiving it.
<<
<
1 of 61
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map