Originally Posted by marinamau:
“I think she is one of the few that is consistently scored about right. I love Sophie but she is not that good of a dancer, she has the most gorgeous lines and is very elegant, but technically she is not a good dancer nor she performs well.
However, Brendan is choreographing really we'll or her, and the music and costume are very harmonious and fitting with her style. All that hides away a multitude of sins when she is dancing. The effect is very pretty, the dance details not so much.
I thought the dance was beautiful, I loved it, but I can see the points of the judges and agree with their scoring.”
Originally Posted by Monaogg:
“The judges were right.
A rumba does not need to be raunchy. It does need to have the proper technique which includes pushing into the floor to get the straight legs and exaggerated hip sway. Both of which were missing. Stripped back does not mean ignoring the basics, which Brendan has chosen to disregard for most of the Latin routines he has choreographed.”
Spot on, the pair of you!
I normally echo Claudia in loathing the bloody rumba, particularly the raunchy versions beloved of professional dancers and, in particular, the show dancers. So I welcome Brendan's lighter, balletic version, which celebrates an emotional connection rather than a physical one.
Having said that, and as much as I like Sophie, I don't think she delivered on that emotion. As Craig pointed out, she did a few bizarre smirks throughout the dance, which, together with a free arm that didn't know what to do with itself, and a habit of looking at the floor rather than at Brendan (except when she was grinning at him), made her look self-conscious and somewhat embarrassed.
She did strike some beautiful poses - just as she did in the AT - but this does not, in my book, constitute nailing the dance itself. In this instance, I think the judges were right.