Originally Posted by Roland Mouse:
“At least those of us who have been sold short on Freeview can get BBC 4 HD and BBC News HD on satellite, but Al Jazeera English HD has gone out of it's way not to get seen.”
Let me clear up a misapprehension Roland. This entire exercise is less about pleasing viewers, more about encouraging the uptake of DVB-T2 equipment, so the DVB-T muxes can be switched off, allowing a frequency re-plan which will clear more space for mobile broadband.
Similarly, digital switch over was less about offering more channels to viewers than it was about clearing spectrum, to sell.
In short, it is about money, not about making you happy. The government is not interested in making you happy. The regulator is not interested in making you happy. The BBC might be interested in making you happy, but it has to play by the rules of the political game it finds itself in just to survive.
Once you see it in those terms, it all makes perfect sense. That's why BBC HD closed months ago, but BBC Three+Four HD have yet to launch. It's why all those made-in-HD and paid-for-in-HD programmes have been broadcast in SD-only for months. These channels don't exist to please you. They exist for a political/commercial aim of pushing consumer behaviour to facilitate the clearance of terrestrial TV spectrum.
The commercial channels are paying bargain rates to be on COM7 partly because of reduced coverage, but partly to encourage them to be in there in the first place. On satellite they pay market rates, and have the pull of a large pay-TV platform. This, rather than some conspiracy theory, explains the PSB vs COM vs SAT discrepancies you know and love.
Cheers,
David.