Originally Posted by ESPIONdansant:
“Anything with celebrities on it gets viewers. For a while.
BBC have melded celebs (a fast-dwindling resource) with traditional light-entertainment.
Celebs learn to cook? Been done. Celebs survive in the jungle? Ditto. Celebs sing? Yep. Stick a celeb in it (oh, Top Gear - Star in a Car) and it'll sell.
If Man U and Arsenal and so forth could only be persuaded to field a celeb each week then I think you'd get viewers. Not me. I hate football. But if you had Chelsea v Man U with Natalie in goal for Chelsea and Susanna in goal for Man U? That WOULD be lots of fun. Plenty of goals!
They should SO do that!
We'd get VT of the training. All the teams would have to go on the London Eye and on a ghost-train and all the other daft stuff. They're all foreigners like the SCD pros so we're used to that.
Bloody genius I am.”
“Anything with celebrities on it gets viewers. For a while.
BBC have melded celebs (a fast-dwindling resource) with traditional light-entertainment.
Celebs learn to cook? Been done. Celebs survive in the jungle? Ditto. Celebs sing? Yep. Stick a celeb in it (oh, Top Gear - Star in a Car) and it'll sell.
If Man U and Arsenal and so forth could only be persuaded to field a celeb each week then I think you'd get viewers. Not me. I hate football. But if you had Chelsea v Man U with Natalie in goal for Chelsea and Susanna in goal for Man U? That WOULD be lots of fun. Plenty of goals!
They should SO do that!
We'd get VT of the training. All the teams would have to go on the London Eye and on a ghost-train and all the other daft stuff. They're all foreigners like the SCD pros so we're used to that.
Bloody genius I am.”
Definitely.
Funny thing is that SCD generates more viewers to see Hairy Dave and Ramps dancing than the two of them cooking or playing cricket - i.e. what they are "celebs" for.
So if everybody swaps around jobs to their level of incompetence viewing will shoot up.
Weird.



