DS Forums

 
 

HTC One Mini banned in UK, HTC One could follow


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-12-2013, 16:26
IslandNiles
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,091

Details here.

http://www.engadget.com/2013/12/03/h...-nokia-patent/

This is part of the ongoing Nokia/HTC patent thing.
IslandNiles is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 03-12-2013, 16:43
enapace
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,249
Thankfully it doesn't include the One as well this has not been HTC's year they built a brilliant device and come up against issue after issue.
enapace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 17:48
Liam_777
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 45
I can't help but feel sorry HTC.

It's not just the One Mini, it's also HTC One Max, HTC One SV, HTC One X+ & One XL, plus both Windows Phone handsets HTC 8X and HTC 8S.

They are only really left with the HTC One to sell. Not good at all for them.
Liam_777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 17:55
BKM
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,288
Thankfully it doesn't include the One as well this has not been HTC's year they built a brilliant device and come up against issue after issue.
A major one of the issues seems to have be very poor marketing of the HTC One BY HTC themselves!

Outside of forums like these it seems to have been Galaxy 3/4 vs the iPhone still!
BKM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 18:05
enapace
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,249
A major one of the issues seems to have be very poor marketing of the HTC One BY HTC themselves!

Outside of forums like these it seems to have been Galaxy 3/4 vs the iPhone still!
That is very true a big problem in america was the fact it got delayed so much on Verizon as well.

I think it is clear that HTC can make an amazing device they need to build marketing more.
enapace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 18:06
grumpyoldbat
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,636
I love the Hipster Troll Carwash!
grumpyoldbat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 18:14
Zack06
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 27,438
This is Microsoft acting through Nokia. I think they are hoping that HTC Android devices flop so that HTC will turn back to Windows Phone. Either that or Microsoft are trying to destroy HTC so that they can acquire it.

HTC had a hit device with the One, but nobody knew about it. They hardly marketed it compared to the iPhone, S4 and even the Xperia Z1 and LG G2.

In fact the most times I've seen a HTC advert is when their name quickly flashes up during football games. They've had hardly any billboards etc compared to the other Android OEMs. Very poor.
Zack06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 18:21
alanwarwic
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
Crazy that HTC agrees to pay Mirosoft sheds load of cash and Microsoft/Nokia to go and outlaw some of them.

No wonder the likes of Asus and Toshiba have Chromebooks arriving.
They probably also see Microsoft as a manufacturer competitor rather than Windows licensor.
alanwarwic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 18:36
IvanIV
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25,199
This is not as when Samsung stole rectangular shape of tablets from Apple. There is a chip in HTC One mini that is patented by Nokia and should not be there.
IvanIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 18:40
alanwarwic
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
Probably that one that fact that HTC bought when unaware it broke the Nokia trademark. Worth $1?
Have they not now changed to different production ?
alanwarwic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 19:32
IvanIV
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25,199
Probably that one that fact that HTC bought when unaware it broke the Nokia trademark. Worth $1?
Have they not now changed to different production ?
They already had troubles with Nokia microphones. It does not matter how much it costs, they should have somebody to check these things. Nokia people can open that phone, point at a thing and say This belongs to us and should not be here without us knowing. Companies sue each other for less. So why risk it. Incompetence or carelessness?
IvanIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 20:45
qasdfdsaq
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,286
It didn't say Nokia on it, it said STM on it. It didn't belong to Nokia either.

You can't check everything you buy against every patent out there. Especially if it requires you to disassemble microchips and map out the circuitry.
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 20:50
enapace
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,249
Surprised Microsoft pushed for a ban instead of just an out of court settlement.
enapace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 21:01
tdenson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,214
This is Microsoft acting through Nokia. I think they are hoping that HTC Android devices flop so that HTC will turn back to Windows Phone. Either that or Microsoft are trying to destroy HTC so that they can acquire it.
.
Why does there always have to be a conspiracy theory on this forum. What's wrong with believing that Nokia are simply defending (and rightly so) their IP ?
tdenson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 21:05
enapace
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,249
Why does there always have to be a conspiracy theory on this forum. What's wrong with believing that Nokia are simply defending (and rightly so) their IP ?
You mean apart from fact that two weeks ago it became Microsoft's IP nothing at all.

I don't think there is a conspiracy I just think HTC have run into bad luck. It is mainly STM's fault but HTC are going bare the brunt of it.
enapace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 21:22
Zack06
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 27,438
Why does there always have to be a conspiracy theory on this forum. What's wrong with believing that Nokia are simply defending (and rightly so) their IP ?
I think it's naive to think that there is no underlying business motive behind these moves. I highly doubt Apple was suing Samsung like crazy solely to "defend their IP". I don't think Nokia/Microsoft is either.
Zack06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 22:39
DANCE OF DEATH
Guest
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 4,723
So it means my HTC One mini is going to a rarity after December 6th.
DANCE OF DEATH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 23:20
neil402003
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 149
Yeah,mine too.Will value rise on EBay?..haha!
neil402003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2013, 23:57
Rush
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 420
HTC One Mini is a great little phone, not the best time for it to get taken of the shelfs.
What is quite worrying is that between January and September this year; HTC sold 750,000 Smartphones(70% of which was HTC One/Mini). Last year HTC sold 440,000 Smartphones between October and December, alone. Will be interesting to find how many units they have shifted between September and December this year..
Rush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 00:07
tdenson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,214
I highly doubt Apple was suing Samsung like crazy solely to "defend their IP".
Actually, I think they were
tdenson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 00:10
tdenson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,214
You mean apart from fact that two weeks ago it became Microsoft's IP nothing at all
Yep. It takes more than two weeks for a company like Microsoft to even begin to realise they own Nokia.

I don't think there is a conspiracy I just think HTC have run into bad luck. It is mainly STM's fault but HTC are going bare the brunt of it.
I agree
tdenson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 07:06
kidspud
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11,501
I think it's naive to think that there is no underlying business motive behind these moves. I highly doubt Apple was suing Samsung like crazy solely to "defend their IP". I don't think Nokia/Microsoft is either.
Defending their IP is the business motive. If you sit back and allow other companies to steal your IP, it will provide no benefit to your business at all.

I'm continued to be amazed that on these forums, that those who protect the business are seen as the bad guys.
kidspud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 07:30
IvanIV
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25,199
It didn't say Nokia on it, it said STM on it. It didn't belong to Nokia either.

You can't check everything you buy against every patent out there. Especially if it requires you to disassemble microchips and map out the circuitry.
I do not believe that there's no technical documentation what baggage comes with what component. And you have to check these things. Because there's big consequences. It already happened once with Nokia microphones in HTC One. Nokia approached this reasonably, but here's something again. I'd say it's this history that made Nokia act more strictly.
IvanIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 07:42
IvanIV
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25,199
I think it's naive to think that there is no underlying business motive behind these moves. I highly doubt Apple was suing Samsung like crazy solely to "defend their IP". I don't think Nokia/Microsoft is either.
This way it works better than if they just said: "Bad, bad HTC. Just don't do it again. Please." It has to hurt for them to notice. It's like corporate reflexes in a way. If their business is hit by this, they'll be more careful next time.
IvanIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 10:05
Roush
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 2,938
You mean apart from fact that two weeks ago it became Microsoft's IP nothing at all.
Wrong on two counts.

Firstly the deal hasn't closed yet. It's still waiting for EU approval so nothing has formally changed hands yet.

Secondly, the IP will remain Nokia's property. Microsoft only gets a license to use it, at a price of EUR 1.65 billion for a 10 year license with an option to extend.

From Nokia's press statement:

Nokia's CTO (Chief Technology Office) organization and patent portfolio will remain within the Nokia Group.

http://press.nokia.com/2013/09/03/no...h-transaction/
Roush is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:02.