• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Ashley disappointed with 35/40: Is the whole marking range too high?
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
kaycee
05-12-2013
Originally Posted by David_Lister:
“Yes it makes sense- Good post!”

Thank you
David_Lister
05-12-2013
Originally Posted by davegold:
“He probably wouldn't have cared about the score if he'd avoided the dance off or put out a poor performance. He did only mention it when the interviewers specifically asked him to. It did look to me like one of the better male rumbas and it does seem almost impossible for a male celeb to get a 10. On the other hand his dances do seem to have been fairly marked since his technical problems stop him looking like a natural dancer. Others have been over marked in comparison but his leaderboard position was often fair.

Does that cover everything?”

Thank you. It's a well-reasoned, full and articulate answer. Infact, just having joined this forum, I'm impressed by the quality of quite a lot of the posts on here.
David_Lister
07-12-2013
He was even more fed up with his 35 tonight, but the thing is 35 is actually a really good score. I am even more convinced now that the judges just started dishing out the 9s and 10s too early and too freely. A 10 should be really rare.
i don't know if the fact that Ashley is starting to show anger will count against him in the public vote. Did I mis-hear or did he shout angrily when he was hooked off the Swing-a-thon?
xorosetylerxo
07-12-2013
Originally Posted by David_Lister:
“He was even more fed up with his 35 tonight, but the thing is 35 is actually a really good score. I am even more convinced now that the judges just started dishing out the 9s and 10s too early and too freely. A 10 should be really rare.
i don't know if the fact that Ashley is starting to show anger will count against him in the public vote. Did I mis-hear or did he shout angrily when he was hooked off the Swing-a-thon?”

Oh he did but that just made me vote for him more
Tejas
07-12-2013
Originally Posted by David_Lister:
“He was even more fed up with his 35 tonight, but the thing is 35 is actually a really good score. I am even more convinced now that the judges just started dishing out the 9s and 10s too early and too freely. A 10 should be really rare.
i don't know if the fact that Ashley is starting to show anger will count against him in the public vote. Did I mis-hear or did he shout angrily when he was hooked off the Swing-a-thon?”

Yes, I very clearly saw him go over to the judges' desk and shout "WHAAAAAT!?" I'm surprised more hasn't been made over that on here actually, I like Ashley but thought he came across badly tonight and may have just taken himself out of the competition!
Monkseal
07-12-2013
I liked Ashley tonight. He's let his growing and obvious hatred for the show bubble to the surface and it's glorious.
FusionFury
07-12-2013
I might be biased because I'm a Ash and Ola fan but for me that was one of the best Salsa performances by any amatuer on Strictly..
Illuvatar
07-12-2013
I don't think he hates the show. He and Ola have fantastic chemistry together, they seem to get along really well and I think he is really making an effort, I just think he's picked up on how unfair the marks are. If he hated the show, I don't think he'd care and just want to be off it.

But he is right, they should have been higher than 35 and should have stayed in the Swingathon as next to Natalie and Artem, they were the best.

As for public vote, I don't think a bit of fire and passion will do him any harm. The only problem I can see is that Len is vengeful and if he is in the dance-off, he will have to rely on the other judges and prepare for a volley from Len because he shouted at him. If he has to rely on Len to keep him in, I'm afraid he's gone.

But he might have enough of a bounce from last week to avoid the dance off. I hope so because this is blatant manipulation from the BBC with only two men left. They just want to keep their guy in and Patrick just isn't as good as Ashley at the moment. Ashley has grown whereas Patrick is regressing.
thenetworkbabe
07-12-2013
Originally Posted by David_Lister:
“It strikes me that if the scores over the course of the series were generally scaled down then it would leave the judges with "somewhere to go" as the series progresses.
At the moment we have the situation where a contestant who is not even one of the very best ones gets 35 four weeks in a row and seems disappointed. But to beat 36 one would need to get at least one perfect 10 and he is nowhere near that.
I think having high scores thrown around like confetti devalues them.”

The marking is just inconsistent. Ashley has to perform highly complex risky routines with lots of steps to get a decent mark, He then gets stuck on 35 for weeks as inevitably he makes mistakes. Patrick does something sedate, makes fewer mistakes and can get more marks by just acting. Natalie avoids risks for her back and Artem avoids the dance itself but they get high marks too. No wonder he is fed up.
WallyWall2013
07-12-2013
I think Ashley is getting so hosed and such a raw deal and it's been so evident this week (as well as past weeks). I gotta rewatch the Salsa but it looked really good (i wish he had a 36 instead) and he was one of the best in the Swing-a-thon and yet he voted out 2nd? Makes no sense. It's sad cause he is improving but his scores stay the same. I feel so bad for him & Ola and I hope they had votes to be completely safe and avoid the dance-off. I would vote for them if I could and lived in the country.
WallyWall2013
07-12-2013
Originally Posted by thenetworkbabe:
“The marking is just inconsistent. Ashley has to perform highly complex risky routines with lots of steps to get a decent mark, He then gets stuck on 35 for weeks as inevitably he makes mistakes. Patrick does something sedate, makes fewer mistakes and can get more marks by just acting. Natalie avoids risks for her back and Artem avoids the dance itself but they get high marks too. No wonder he is fed up.”

Yeah there is so much inconsistency with how the judges scores/critiques the contestants. I definitely understand Ashley's frustration and confusion with it all.
FusionFury
07-12-2013
Originally Posted by Tejas:
“Yes, I very clearly saw him go over to the judges' desk and shout "WHAAAAAT!?" I'm surprised more hasn't been made over that on here actually, I like Ashley but thought he came across badly tonight and may have just taken himself out of the competition!”

He was so fuming and in rage he dropped Ola!

I understand him though. But he has to hope he's not in the dance off and relying on Len to save him because Len is a senile old man who holds grudges
fatskia
07-12-2013
It looked to me like they had been asked to act up when voted off. Brendan did a bit of it too.
Patchbuncle
08-12-2013
Sheesh, everyone waved their arms about or shouted at the judges when their names were called out, (whispers) I think they were all told to do it as part of the authentic (!) Swingathon.
allaboard
08-12-2013
Originally Posted by Patchbuncle:
“Sheesh, everyone waved their arms about or shouted at the judges when their names were called out, (whispers) I think they were all told to do it as part of the authentic (!) Swingathon.”

Exactly. It is a bit like the dance off in Grease. I love that scene!!
Cadiva
08-12-2013
Originally Posted by fatskia:
“It looked to me like they had been asked to act up when voted off. Brendan did a bit of it too.”

Exactly, and exactly the same as they did the last time SCD had a Swingathon, the couples gesticulating and complaining towards the judges, scripted and utterly predictable.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map