Originally Posted by aggielane:
“Matthew called her lazy for what she does in camp.
He called her selfish because in the task he told her he would wake her every time to complete her part but said 2 days later she would not get booze if it was on offer.
When asked if he thought Amy was playing a game with Lucy and Al he said probably the bloke on the panel said she isn't that clever Vincent said she is that clever.”
No he didn't. He called her lazy in connection with waking her up. He was talking about her being lazy and said" And when we done the memory trial, I had to keep waking her up because she kept going to sleep".
Originally Posted by vald:
“But he didn't see it....that is made clear in that (old) article. We know that Matthew was indeed in the jungle, unless he sent a body double. I honestly don't think he will waste much breath on Amy, she's just not interesting enough. Let's hope we get to hear more about the ones that were interesting.”
So then he makes things up to suit his agenda? Why would he do something like that? Can someone who fabricates stories like that,be trusted?
Originally Posted by aggielane:
“I saw it but then he was appearing on an after show that does nothing but mock all the camp mates so I wasn't really shocked by it.”
Yes the show does mock the contestants, but I can't remember a fellow contestant acting like that before. It's not as though he was using clever words to put her down, he was pulling silly pathetic faces in an attempt to get a laugh. But then again he'll do anything to get a laugh; like having a 'lighthearted laugh' at the death of someone's child.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...on-murder.html
