Originally Posted by Harry_Stevens:
“Well at least Dickens was honest about his opinions and that female caller assuming because he had a different opinion to hers made him a violent thug is typical left wing hypocrisy.
”
“Well at least Dickens was honest about his opinions and that female caller assuming because he had a different opinion to hers made him a violent thug is typical left wing hypocrisy.
”
Mike Dickin may not have been a right wing thug, and I'm sure would never have wanted to physically harm anyone, but the trouble is that people who hold the views he did, and that he verbalised to the lady caller regarding her sexuality, almost begin to legitimise the behaviour of those who wish to act as thugs and bullies in the way that the lady described from her past life being made a misery. Others with more violent intentions will always take views like Dickin expressed on that radio show as a very misplaced green light for their own pathetic agendas. If he were to say that on a radio show tonight, or if anyone else was to, I think they'd be fired almost immediately. I wonder if he would have dared say that to her face, or was he using the safety of his microphone? This is something I always wondered about Dickin. Would he really say these things to a person face to face given the same chance. Apparently he did in a 1981 radio studio, but 20 years later?
Originally Posted by Luca:
“
He wasn't keen on homosexuality. He said the UK had become a foul-mouthed, poorly-educated haven of the yobbo and the yobette, run by hand-wringing yoghurt knitters. He said he couldn't wait to depart in a living sense. Unfortunately, he never got the chance.”
“
He wasn't keen on homosexuality. He said the UK had become a foul-mouthed, poorly-educated haven of the yobbo and the yobette, run by hand-wringing yoghurt knitters. He said he couldn't wait to depart in a living sense. Unfortunately, he never got the chance.”
In this case he must have been full of self loathing then, because the rant towards the lesbian lady over her sexuality and the subsequent rambling about her intellect as the call ended suggests somebody equally foul mouthed and poorly educated on the face of it.
He was one of those odd characters to listen to. When he was good he was very good, but when he was bad he was very bad indeed, infact appalling and embarrassingly so. There was no middle ground.





