Originally Posted by biggeral:
“i thought the first series of Survivor was one of the best TV series I have seen. I think the idea for IAC came from Survivor. In the second series, the public did have a say of sorts, but I think with a bit of tweaking, Survivor with the outcome decided totally by viewers could be terrific. The problem with the 2 camps in Survivor, especially the second series, was that it got too predictable who the last 4/5 would be. The challenges were not so "High Tech", but were not that dissimilar to the trials in IAC apart from everybody had to take part in each challenge.”
What I love about Survivor, though, is that the public have no say. I wouldn't want the viewers to decide, The winner should be who played the best game, not just in challenges, but building alliances, strategizing etc. If it was a public vote Mr Nice-Guy who did nothing but sit around being friendly would walk away with the money, while Mr Strategy who made the risky moves and turned on people etc would be hated. Personally I'd love a UK version of Survivor, with it's current format. Having watched BB and IAC for a number of years, I can't help but feel the GBP aren't great at picking winners imo.