Originally Posted by Straker:
“Shouting and tales about booze seem to be the majority of his schtick.”
“Shouting and tales about booze seem to be the majority of his schtick.”
"Seem" being the operative word. You don't like someone so you latch onto the things you don't like about them.
Originally Posted by Straker:
“Didn't.”
“Didn't.”
Except that your post didn't mention anyone else but Vegas and the eclair. So he was the one at fault, according to you.
Originally Posted by Straker:
“Not when he's propping up the pitiful Reeves/Moir.”
“Not when he's propping up the pitiful Reeves/Moir.”
In your opinion.
Originally Posted by Straker:
“But it isn't. Not even on here.”
“But it isn't. Not even on here.”
None so vocal as you about it though. The point is despite your negative view the panel and audience liked it. Can you not accept that, instead of denying it?
Originally Posted by Straker:
“I can't help that you read my posts and are overwhelmed by the fierce authority and conviction with which they're presented can I? I wish I could say the same when reading yours but sadly.....”
“I can't help that you read my posts and are overwhelmed by the fierce authority and conviction with which they're presented can I? I wish I could say the same when reading yours but sadly.....”
This one paragraph puts your mindset on this forum perfectly.




. As your post proved, each to their own, comedy-wise. I should have obviously clarified my post to make it clearer it was my own personal feeling about the "perfect" line-up.