Good grace? She had to get out of that confrontation ASAP as she was lying yet again. How can anyone trust a word she says now? Al said as much to her when we saw what the producers allowed us to see of their conversation. Is he wrong too? She had blatantly lied about him. How would you like to be on the receiving end of that?

I agree. BUT did we see the whole conversation between her and Al? Her lying about him might have been discussed. This has mainly been brushed over by ITV. I read today on TBB that her father is now in talks about an ITV 2 show, which may explain a lot! I have NO link before I am asked..

Amy wanted it filmed cause it keeps her in the public eye
just like the fake romance.... Money Money Money...
And apparently it was Amy that started said conversation
She wanted to set the record straight and started on Rebecca

wrong again. Amy initiated it. She wanted to confront Rebecca's lies.



Whether Amy wanted it filmed or not, the others didn't have to agree to it. They could have said no.

Amy initiated it and you know this how?

Whatever do you mean, 'wrong again'? You appear to have said that I was wrong then said nothing whatsoever that contradicted what I said, other than the very bizarre phrase 'Rebecca's lies'.

I don't like "edited out" rhetoric that has become so popular of late. That something isn't included in the highlights shows does not mean it had been edited out, as if it had been included but someone decided to suppress it.


I cannot make sense of that sentence.

How is it projection at all?




I cannot make sense of what you're trying to say "agreed to put it out", or the way it was worded in the other thread.

You seem to be trying to suggest that Amy somehow approved what was shown and the way it was shown; and you're making it sound like Amy knew in advance what the content would be and decided she wanted it filmed, or that after it had happened she could have said "no, you can't put it out".

It doesn't matter who walks away first. If we have an argument, and I say "you're right" or "I take it back" or something else that would count as backing down, then I've backed down. Which of us walks away is irrelevant.

Anyway, neither of them backed down.


It was another of the sly digs at posters who defend Amy that have become so popular lately.

In answer to the OP.

I think the clue was earlier on where we were shown a clip that Rebecca discovered that part of Amy's contraband was the blue bikini top. She looked really annoyed and said WTTE that Amy had told her that she'd already handed it in. When in fact she hadn't.

Perhaps the repeatedly giving her chances had to do with this and others that were left on the cutting room floor. After all we didn't actually get to see why Rebecca was so annoyed about the blue bikini top, and yet from her response on seeing it in the clip, it would appear that it must've happened.

Well it probably wasn't, come to think of it. That would suggest that Chip paper actually did think the others looked 'bitter and beat', whereas actually I think he or she was just baiting.




It seemed obvious that both conversations were arranged in advance by those involved. (I mean, the first one could not possibly have been anything else, since it was in a private room, and the second one did not look like a camera crew creeping up unexpectedly.) Both Amy and Rebecca wanted to state their position; perhaps both really did think they would get the other one to back down.


No, I'm sure she was stuck with it once it had been filmed; I think it was a bit of a mistake for her to do the conversations at all. She had already said her piece in the tabloids and had nothing much to gain by being filmed having arguments; she seemed oddly taken by surprise by Alfonso's, and reduced to agreeing meekly with everything he said.

Oh how I will laugh if Amy manages to secure her own TV series and she becomes a successful TV celeb.
I've no idea what format maybe a reality show ala KP or even a joint venture with Joey . They could both quite easily manage to co - present some kind of light hearted chat show or some kind .
They are the only ones that I'd like to see do really well as the others have either had a career or simply don't deserve anything .

Amy doesn't have the personality to become a 'successful TV celeb' she's way too bland IMO.

Well the world of tv constantly takes me by surprise, but KP was vastly better known than Amy when she got her rtv show. I should think Amy's best chance of further tv work is as a contestant on another rtv show. It's a pretty incestuous world, and they seem to look round for someone who has created waves on series x when they are selecting for series y.

Very true. I can't see her getting her own show TBH - she certainly became a bit of a talking point but for all the wrong reasons. I don't honestly see what 'personality' she could bring to her own show.

She will be remembered for being a stirrer and a liar who liked to play the victim. I can't see that this would be the 'persona' she'd want on a RTV show as it's clear she likes to be seen as 'sweetness and light'.

Who knows ........they tried it with Speidi ..................that went well didn't it?

Amy does'nt have enough personality to carry a reality show ..either on her own or even with joey

Come on now, seriously.

At whom? If you mean people who didn't think the others were jealous of her, that's an odd mindset, since that doesn't translate into wishing her ill or lack of success.

I think the people they choose because they created waves was because they did so with gusto, oomph, & personality.

Amy just seemed to float along in her own world not even aware she was creating waves. As I say bland, lost in the world of Amy.

Do you think if she carries out the same act in the next RTV she does she'll get away with it again? I.e., she's an angel and everyone else in the show is bullying her? What's more - will she get a load of gullible people falling for it again or will some of them have 'woken up and smelled the coffee' by then?

I don't think it'll come to that personally - I think she'll nab a footballer before then!

I wouldn't be surprised if she's not in the next CBB

I can't stand those type of shows, but I'll be laughing along with you.

I agree she is extremely bland but I also think she's manipulative and ruthless and will use people as stepping stones until she reaches the level of z list fame she wants. Being the new Katie Price is probably the height of her ambition.

If this fake are they/aren't they Joey nonsense continues, it'll last long enough for her to dump him for a minor footballer and a place in the CBB house where she can claim to have, yet again, been 'bullied' by 'jealous' women and get signed by CAN, the patron saints of victimhood

I can see that happening. She'll be the new Speidi of RTV.