Originally Posted by wonkeydonkey:
“I can't for the life of me see what you are trying to prove. She is probably not that well known among people who have absolutely no interest in sport, but you could say that about almost anyone in any sport. As a double olympic gold winner and world record holder quite recently, she is a pretty big deal in the world of UK sport, which doesn't have that many olympic athletes to have achieved those things.
Yes, and Amy got 'slated a lot of Twitter' as well. Does that mean that 'her reputation is in tatters'? No, it just means that there was a bit of a spat on twitter, which affected no one and was not backed up by much in the way of press.”
I'm not sure what you're trying to prove because that's what I more or less said as regards her fame.
Originally Posted by wonkeydonkey:
“1. I don't believe that Rebecca had ANY intention of using it; she was wrong-footed by Amy's sudden production of forbidden goods, and said what she did to get politely out of an embarrassing situation. There is no mistaking Rebecca's furious honesty in saying that she did not use it.
2. I do believe that this was by no means clear to Amy; when she said that Rewbecca had used it (she shouldn't have said 'other people', but still) she had no idea at all how badly Rebecca would take it; she genuinely thought that Rebecca had as good as used it, and assumed that Rebecca would back her up.”
Don't tell me that you have never seen anyone put on a 'pretence'of being angry, so that those looking on(like yourself)thinks ' they must be telling the truth, why else would they be that angry?'
Oh for the gullible.
If someone was to offer me something that is illegal,and I had no intentions of using it, the last thing I'd do is to handle it. But I guess we're not all the same.
Originally Posted by Daisy19:
“I missed it, sorry i'm not perfect like you and don't miss things,,actually you are not perfect as you can't even read properly as I have already said this...*rolls eyes*”
She is perfect.
Originally Posted by wonkeydonkey:
“Disagreeing with something doesn't mean ignoring it. No she wasn't 'willing to use' it at all; she had no reason to suppose Amy would produce any such thing when she called her to the hut. There is no reason at all to doubt her dislike for rule-breaking, or her desire to back away from the situation as politely as possible.”
You speak as if you know her personally, if you do, then fair enough. But I'm guessing that you don't know her anymore than we do and all you're doing is guessing and fantasising how you would like to think matters went.