Originally Posted by scout2006:
“Imho, the only marked difference in the routines on DOI week to week is the music. For some of the celebs the speed of their skating doesn't vary whether they're skating to a ballad or a dance tune, it's only really the costumes that identify the theme. On SCD you have the celebs that are good/bad at ballroom, the ones that are good/bad at latin and the odd few that are complete rubbish at both. There have been celebs who have been great at latin but crap at ballroom and vice versa, so their fans have to get voting quite early on in the series if they get a dance that doesn't suit them. There have also been more celebs that have drastically improved during an SCD series as opposed to DoI. It's just my opinion of course, but the skaters that are really bad in week one don't generally get much better. I just think the novelty's worn off with DoI.”
You are right I think. DOI relies on people getting good routines and very few are actually written, and very few people are capable of performing them.
It works more than one way too. SCD not only has different dances, and a wider range of music, it also has successful contestants in more sorts of shapes and sizes. On SCD you can dance badly, on DOI you shouldn't get to do the move at all if you can't do it well enough to be safe. The requirements to be good on DOI are narrower. There's a reason why all 5 top females in this series are under 5-3 (as is Clare who should have been here) There's a reason too why many of the most successful males come from backgrounds where strong leg muscles were needed, and if they are to do any lifting upper body strength is needed too. There's good reason too why 4 females in the allstars and both surviving males, are actors, 3 females at least, and Ray are dance trained, 3 females and both surviving males sing for a living, and one contender is an olympic gymnast. Basically, only two or three people are going to perform well every series, the others have less scope to be funny than on SCD. That leaves acres of filler time in the show, between the few real contenders doing the few really good routines they get written for them.
DOI also seems to have failed to get enough of the right people. It had Clare Buckfield as an alternate when she was in the top 2 of series 2 which hardly suggests competence. It bizarrely reportedly failed to accept people like Tina Barrett and Noel Sullivan who look made for the show, and it failed to tap the people who had shown clear potential on SCD.
There are other problems though. the illthoughtout judging criteria - that managed not to reward difficulty or reflect the overall performance or properly judge any acting, the inability to seperate marking the performer and the choreography, the anti-judge voting provoked by the panto judging......
Their answer - to add twists for excitement and, made up, off ice, VT stories, didn't help either. They either distorted the result , ironically most destructively by destroying the competition in the allstars competition, or, most of the time, fell flat, and produced entirely predictable, pointless, results.
They basically forgot that what you want is people who we get to know a bit, doing difficult things that are entertaining - and didn't tackle their biggest problem - lack of good contestants, great routines, and ideas for them.