• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • General Discussion Forums
  • Food and Drink
Is a fried egg higher in calories/choleteral than a boiled one?
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
brangdon
11-01-2014
Originally Posted by GeordiePaul:
“Or you could fry using 1 calorie spray, I've done this and they turn out fine and not greasy.”

Must make it hard to baste the egg, though.

Originally Posted by njp:
“And you also don't want the white burnt, which seems to be what a lot of people end up with.”

Not burnt, but brown and crackling is for me an essential part of the fried egg experience. If I don't want that I'll poach them instead.

(I used to avoid poaching because my mother used special steamer cup things which weren't non-stick and which were horrible to clean. Now I don't use any special equipment. I use a few inches of boiling water in a deep frying pan. The eggs hit the bottom and spread out much as if they were fried, but there's no fat involved. I suspect purists would disparage the final flat shape, but it's convenient on toast.)
njp
11-01-2014
Originally Posted by brangdon:
“Not burnt, but brown and crackling is for me an essential part of the fried egg experience. If I don't want that I'll poach them instead.”

Yuk! That's what I meant by burnt. I didn't realise some people liked them done that way.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map