Originally Posted by Radical Joe:
“Really? Well, I'm straight and I've jokingly referred to calling myself and other straight people as 'breeders' and never thought anyone would find it offensive. Nor has anyone (gay or straight) that has heard me use the term. And I wouldn't find it offensive if a gay person used the term either.
But, seeing as you call yourself an 'equal opportunities grump' and claim to be consistent, then presumably you'd also have an issue with a gay man referring to other gay men as 'queers' or a black man referring to other black men as 'n******s'. Only, in my experience, these terms uttered by gay and black people are generally seen by the self-proclaimed 'equal opportunities' crowd as non-offensive, liberating and an attempt to 'reclaim' an abusive term. Being a actual believer in equal opportunities, I say either allow everyone to use the word (my preference) or no-one. This practice of confining acceptable use of a term to a specific group whilst outlawing it elsewhere is, to my mind, both illogical and divisive.”
Good points.
It is a freakin minefield and the contradictions on what is acceptable are ridiculous.
I had a longer post typed on wtf is acceptable terminology, but it included the words *coloured* and *black* and I knew those mere words would incite a flurry of alerts .
Dumbed down overly pc DS .