|
||||||||
Jasmine's overly botoxed face |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 25,713
|
Jasmine's overly botoxed face
For a young woman she hasn't half had a lot of work done. She's got that distinctive bloated and puffy "pillow faced" look that women who've had far too much Botox and far too many fillers have, It's usually seen in women at least a decade older than Jasmine is though, without make up she looks freaky and odd,
I will never understand why anyone does that to themselves? Don't they realise how awful they look?
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 28
|
I agree. Though there is no denying as bad as it sounds she looks 100% better after.
She has gone from plain to very pretty but dosnt look human. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,038
|
Quote:
For a young woman she hasn't half had a lot of work done. She's got that distinctive bloated and puffy "pillow faced" look that women who've had far too much Botox and far too many fillers have, It's usually seen in women at least a decade older than Jasmine is though, without make up she looks freaky and odd,
I will never understand why anyone does that to themselves? Don't they realise how awful they look? ![]() I actually debate even the conclusion she's botoxed. Her face is thinner, especially her lips, and her forehead is identical. Something like cheek implants was suggested in another thread (I'm skeptical--she's not very wealthy and that's a particularly expensive procedure). Botox is cheap, but she doesn't have the tell-tale signs. Look beyond the glossy hair and skin at the actual features. The same or thinner/sharper, not puffier/plusher. She even has a noticable scar under her right eye at both age 18 and 31, and that's definitely the first thing someone would have addressed by cosmetic procedures. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: North East, England
Posts: 1,948
|
Sams face looks worse imo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,586
|
Quote:
Side by side between the photos of her mugshot from age 18 and her current appearance now 13 years later, there's actually very little difference.
I actually debate even the conclusion she's botoxed. Her face is thinner, especially her lips, and her forehead is identical. Something like cheek implants was suggested in another thread (I'm skeptical--she's not very wealthy and that's a particularly expensive procedure). Botox is cheap, but she doesn't have the tell-tale signs. Look beyond the glossy hair and skin at the actual features. The same or thinner/sharper, not puffier/plusher. She even has a noticable scar under her right eye at both age 18 and 31, and that's definitely the first thing someone would have addressed by cosmetic procedures. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,790
|
I don't get the hype about how "sexy" Jasmine looks, her face looks frozen. Although... her face isn't as bad as Liz's, her surgeon did an horrendous job.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 25,713
|
Quote:
She's 10000% had work done. I know loads of people who have and have the same tell-tale signs...stretched in places, slightly contorted when they pull certain faces. Its very noticeable in Jasmine around the mouth particularly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,586
|
Quote:
I don't get the hype about how "sexy" Jasmine looks, her face looks frozen. Although... her face isn't as bad as Liz's, her surgeon did an horrendous job.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,790
|
Quote:
Did you see Liz before? She looked much worse. All those years of loathing everyone including herself reflected in a prematurely haggard hang-dog face, not helped by a pair of witchy hair curtains. IMO she looks miles better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,586
|
Quote:
I did and you're right, she looked like a witch. However, the bottom half of her face looks too tight now, almost like she's had reconstructive surgery from burn scars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 9,275
|
Quote:
For a young woman she hasn't half had a lot of work done. She's got that distinctive bloated and puffy "pillow faced" look that women who've had far too much Botox and far too many fillers have, It's usually seen in women at least a decade older than Jasmine is though, without make up she looks freaky and odd,
I will never understand why anyone does that to themselves? Don't they realise how awful they look? ![]() I will never understand why some posters always seem to feel the need to find some kind of fault, no matter how minor with the women who are generally regarded as aesthetically beautiful. At some stage they always seem to get picked up on relatively minor (and to many, almost totally unimportant/ irrelevant) 'defects', almost to 'take them down a peg or 2' in the looks stakes. This isn't just about Jasmine but I see it all the time on forums when it comes to women especially on certain reality shows. If it's not their botox, their 'plastic face' or their their 'trout pout' it's something else. Some people will always find something, no matter how small to bash them for. I'm not saying you personally are doing this, and this isn;'t an attack on you but some might think it was slightly clutching at straws or just looking to find fault in someone who I'd wager the majority find far more attractive than average, botox and all. I've seen this place go into meltdown in the past when an unattractive or an overweight woman is ever critiqued on her physical appearance, especially if it's re her weight. Some try and backtrack and say oh but that's different, anyone who's had work done is almost 'asking for it'. I say that's total nonsense. I just wish this place was more consistent and had far less double standards. It's either ok to mock someone's physical appearance or it's not in my opinion. It reminds me of Jordan feeling the need to publicly call Kelly Brook a heifer or the 'pointy elbows 2 out of 10 would not bang' internet meme guy- this kind of thing can smack of ulterior motives. There. I said it. The tin hat is on, and strapped down tight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,038
|
Quote:
You think she looks awful? Really?
I will never understand why some posters always seem to feel the need to find some kind of fault, no matter how minor with the women who are generally regarded as aesthetically beautiful. At some stage they always seem to get picked up on relatively minor (and to many, almost totally unimportant/ irrelevant) 'defects', almost to 'take them down a peg or 2' in the looks stakes. This isn't just about Jasmine but I see it all the time on forums when it comes to women especially on certain reality shows. If it's not their botox, their 'plastic face' or their their 'trout pout' it's something else. Some people will always find something, no matter how small to bash them for. I'm not saying you personally are doing this, and this isn;'t an attack on you but some might think it was slightly clutching at straws or just looking to find fault in someone who I'd wager the majority find far more attractive than average, botox and all. I've seen this place go into meltdown in the past when an unattractive or an overweight woman is ever critiqued on her physical appearance, especially if it's re her weight. Some try and backtrack and say oh but that's different, anyone who's had work done is almost 'asking for it'. I say that's total nonsense. I just wish this place was more consistent and had far less double standards. It's either ok to mock someone's physical appearance or it's not in my opinion. It reminds me of Jordan feeling the need to publicly call Kelly Brook a heifer or the 'pointy elbows 2 out of 10 would not bang' internet meme guy- this kind of thing can smack of ulterior motives. There. I said it. The tin hat is on, and strapped down tight. ![]() There's no "tightening" around Jasmine's eyes that's visible, as is being insisted on, and certainly no change in her forehead or her lips or the other places such procedures would show. Going feature by feature her face is actually massively consistent between a picture we know was taken 13 years ago (a mugshot) and her current face. People are insisting those things are there, because they want an excuse to hate her, to hate ON her. Which is fine, people, hate her. But don't feel the need to invent fictional surgeries to do so--use an actual opinion about the actions you see from her. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,498
|
Actually I have no idea what she used to look like before. I have no interest either really. I personally think she looks very stretched, pulled and artificial .......maybe it's natural - I don't know.
I think I'm the only person who doesn't rate her much - I think she looks a bit grubby - I must have odd taste - I think the same about Angelina Jolie - both look like they need a good scrub. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,156
|
I agree with the OP
She has that Sharon Osbourne look going on, faces filled to the brim with some kind of fluid that just makes them look so plasticky. Not necessary on a young woman or older woman come to that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 25,713
|
Quote:
Did you see Liz before? She looked much worse. All those years of loathing everyone including herself reflected in a prematurely haggard hang-dog face, not helped by a pair of witchy hair curtains. IMO she looks miles better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,498
|
Quote:
Liz does looks better for having a face lift, but her jet black hair is really ageing. She could do with toning the colour down a bit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 8,044
|
Here we go again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,586
|
Quote:
Not just the hateful nitpicking on the woman's appearance but the actual invention of "signs" of plastic surgery that aren't actually there, just to have something to dig on.
There's no "tightening" around Jasmine's eyes that's visible, as is being insisted on, and certainly no change in her forehead or her lips or the other places such procedures would show. Going feature by feature her face is actually massively consistent between a picture we know was taken 13 years ago (a mugshot) and her current face. People are insisting those things are there, because they want an excuse to hate her, to hate ON her. Which is fine, people, hate her. But don't feel the need to invent fictional surgeries to do so--use an actual opinion about the actions you see from her. Keep kidding yourself she hasn't and we're inventing signs but my eye is clearly more used to seeing it than yours, and she has. Fillers in the nasal folds, tiny bit above the mouth for those fine lines that appear in your 30s, possible botox in the eyebrow arch. See J Lo for great subtle work versus Jennifer Aniston's slightly more obvious but still subtle mouth fillers, and then the very noticeable examples of fillers like Nicole Kidman and Catherine Zeta Jones. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 25,713
|
Quote:
Yes it is a bit dark for her skin tone/colouring. Makes her look very cold and hard. A warmer chestnut with highlights would (I think) make her look far 'brighter' and more natural.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 25,713
|
Quote:
You think she looks awful? Really?
I will never understand why some posters always seem to feel the need to find some kind of fault, no matter how minor with the women who are generally regarded as aesthetically beautiful. At some stage they always seem to get picked up on relatively minor (and to many, almost totally unimportant/ irrelevant) 'defects', almost to 'take them down a peg or 2' in the looks stakes. This isn't just about Jasmine but I see it all the time on forums when it comes to women especially on certain reality shows. If it's not their botox, their 'plastic face' or their their 'trout pout' it's something else. Some people will always find something, no matter how small to bash them for. I'm not saying you personally are doing this, and this isn;'t an attack on you but some might think it was slightly clutching at straws or just looking to find fault in someone who I'd wager the majority find far more attractive than average, botox and all. I've seen this place go into meltdown in the past when an unattractive or an overweight woman is ever critiqued on her physical appearance, especially if it's re her weight. Some try and backtrack and say oh but that's different, anyone who's had work done is almost 'asking for it'. I say that's total nonsense. I just wish this place was more consistent and had far less double standards. It's either ok to mock someone's physical appearance or it's not in my opinion. It reminds me of Jordan feeling the need to publicly call Kelly Brook a heifer or the 'pointy elbows 2 out of 10 would not bang' internet meme guy- this kind of thing can smack of ulterior motives. There. I said it. The tin hat is on, and strapped down tight. ![]() But if you want to trot out the tired, old boring "jealousy" argument that we've heard on this forum about 200 million times in the past then be my guest
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,038
|
Quote:
People looking for an excuse to "hate on her"? That's your theory? I have almost ZERO opinion on Jasmine, other than an observation that she's most definitely had some touching up, as have most celebs over 30 according to plastic surgeons in the know, and indeed some under 30. I go to a salon where all the 20 somethings have "preventative" botox. I have friends who've had work done as have I on occasion so I'm not judging it at all other than to observe that she's had it done.
Keep kidding yourself she hasn't and we're inventing signs but my eye is clearly more used to seeing it than yours, and she has. Fillers in the nasal folds, tiny bit above the mouth for those fine lines that appear in your 30s, possible botox in the eyebrow arch. See J Lo for great subtle work versus Jennifer Aniston's slightly more obvious but still subtle mouth fillers, and then the very noticeable examples of fillers like Nicole Kidman and Catherine Zeta Jones. She's got an obvious scar under her right eye that's present in both her 13 year old mugshot and current pictures, so there's a key thing someone would have addressed if they were surgery obsessed which is definitely the same. In terms of fillers and botox, I suppose its possible, but if so it's not the major facial reshaping people harp on with people like Kidman. If it's there its not enough to have changed the shape, location or size of any of her features--so if you insist she's had it then its one of the most effective uses of I've ever seen. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Herts
Posts: 3,040
|
Whether she's had work or not, in my opinion she is absolutely stunning to look at. Younger people can look better with a little bit of cosmetic enhancement whereas older women can look more false and artificial. Ten years ago, Sharon Osbourne looked a lot better than in her pre-surgery days (she looked very frumpy and middle-aged in her thirties) and the work she had done just made her look great whereas now she looks very fake and the work is a lot more obvious. The same applies to nearly all older celebrities who just look weird rather than better eg. Priscilla Presley, Joan Rivers, Cher etc. I think there comes a time when women just need to age gracefully.
Looking at the picture of Jasmine when she was 18 the main features have remained unaltered - her eyebrows are now thicker and defined, she has lost a lot of weight and changed her hair colour. She's probably had botox but that's a given nowadays for even non celebrities of a certain age. I just think she is breathtakingly beautiful - but I don't like her much and I prefer the personalities and conduct of Sam and Casey in the house. I don't understand how anyone would not class Jasmine as stunning though I appreciate we all have our own ideas on what constitutes beauty. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 8,044
|
Quote:
Yes I think she looks awful. It's my opinion, you don't have to agree with me. Botox and fillers never look good on anyone ever, and if you looked after your skin properly then you wouldn't really need them at all. If you are in the public eye and have had work done then yes you are asking for it on my opinion, because people will always judge celebrities on the way they look. That's just the way the cookie crumbles.
But if you want to trot out the tired, old boring "jealousy" argument that we've heard on this forum about 200 million times in the past then be my guest ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: American Living In England
Posts: 1,234
|
Y'all slay me, let the girl be great.
She's pretty, who cares if she's had work done. Did y'all pay for it? |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,330
|
Quote:
I don't get the hype about how "sexy" Jasmine looks, her face looks frozen. Although... her face isn't as bad as Liz's, her surgeon did an horrendous job.
I hate botox; it NEVER makes anyone under 50 look better. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:29.


