|
||||||||
Sherlock - BBC Drama (Part 3) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#126 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,561
|
Quote:
Maybe Redbeard is a Redherring? Or not.
To be honest I'm Sherlocked out right now, and am starting not to care about any of it. Or more likely, none of the above.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#127 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,740
|
Quote:
I can't believe people are saying how Sherlock survived doesn't matter. It was the whole cliffhanger, the whole drawing point for series 3, Moffat kept going on about us not having guessed it then 'revealed' it was the theory guessed immediately after the episode by countless fans online! If he doesn't explain it then he has no need to resolve any cliffhanger in the future. This is the equivalent of starting season 2 with John and Sherlock outside the pool going 'crikey, that got hairy for a moment'. It will be explained by the end of episode 3, it has to be.
The airbag theory can't be correct because as many people pointed out its full of holes, and just all very neat, not to mention involving 327 accomplices and the closing down of an entire London street, as well as Molly magically finding a Sherlock lookalike corpse to lie on the ground for 5 seconds to then switch with Sherlock anyway. As theories go, it's the worst of the 'plausible' ones and I think that was the point. That's the whole point of a cliffhanger. If you set up a great cliffhanger then you're effectively promising a great payoff for when people tune back in next time. |
|
|
|
|
|
#128 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,740
|
Quote:
At the end of ASiB Mycroft tells Watson that Sherlock wanted to be a pirate when he was a child. So maybe "Redbeard" was Mycroft's way of telling Sherlock he was trying to be something he could never be. Or maybe Mycroft was testing to see if Sherlock really is Sherlock. Or maybe its some kind of reference to Irene Adler, (ie, Mycroft's discovered that she's still alive).
Or more likely, none of the above. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#129 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,194
|
Quote:
I agree with you. It does matter.
That's the whole point of a cliffhanger. If you set up a great cliffhanger then you're effectively promising a great payoff for when people tune back in next time. |
|
|
|
|
|
#130 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 193
|
I think Redbeard is Magnusson - he's been a part of Sherlock & Mycrofts childhood.
Mark gatiss has tweeted once this week and all it said was Redbeard. I also don't think anything will be wrapped up - we are definitely going to be left wanting... Love and hate Sherlock equally for that! |
|
|
|
|
|
#131 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 905
|
Don't know if it's been mentioned on this or the last thread but there's some sort of Q & A after the last episode on Sunday, with an opportunity to submit your own questions - https://ssl.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p01dmdcb/contact
|
|
|
|
|
|
#132 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 7,744
|
Quote:
I think Redbeard is Magnusson - he's been a part of Sherlock & Mycrofts childhood.
Mark gatiss has tweeted once this week and all it said was Redbeard. I also don't think anything will be wrapped up - we are definitely going to be left wanting... Love and hate Sherlock equally for that!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#133 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,561
|
Quote:
I've heard it's meant to be an even bigger cliffhanger
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#134 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 15,066
|
Quote:
If they don't give a more satisfactory resolution to the last cliffhanger I don't think it will matter. People will just assume that whatever cliffhanger is at the end of s3 won't get a proper resolution anyway, and lose interest.
There was so much excitement and speculation about the cliffhanger ending of series 2, and I feel that series 3 has been far too dismissive of this. I don't get people who say it doesn't matter. Did they say that at the end of series 2? Did they not have fun speculating about how it could have happened? If there is another cliffhanger at the end of series 3, then I doubt people will be on here speculating about the outcome - they'll just shrug and say it's not worth it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#135 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lothlórien
Posts: 19,736
|
Don't know if any of you have seen some of the tweets coming through from the HLV press review.
Gah! They tease us. |
|
|
|
|
|
#136 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,561
|
^Totally agree.
And I have another problem with that solution given with the airbag, etc. Its not just the logical issues that Benry Gale outlined above, its the fact that it was given to Anderson. Frickin Anderson???? Sherlock despises Anderson, for a start. In one episode he told him to shut his mouth before he lowers the IQ of the entire street. And for seconds, later in that same episode Watson asked him how he did it, and Sherlock dodged the question. If these writers are half as clever as people think they are, they know that the explanation to the viewer always comes through explaining to Watson - that's mostly the point of Watson's existence in the Sherlock Holmes stories. So when, (or if?), we get the real explanation at all it should be through Sherlock explaining to Watson. If that doesn't happen, I suppose I'll still tune in for Sherlock s4, but then again, I watch Hollyoaks so that's not saying much. |
|
|
|
|
|
#137 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,674
|
Quote:
^Totally agree.
And I have another problem with that solution given with the airbag, etc. Its not just the logical issues that Benry Gale outlined above, its the fact that it was given to Anderson. Frickin Anderson???? Sherlock despises Anderson, for a start. In one episode he told him to shut his mouth before he lowers the IQ of the entire street. And for seconds, later in that same episode Watson asked him how he did it, and Sherlock dodged the question. If these writers are half as clever as people think they are, they know that the explanation to the viewer always comes through explaining to Watson - that's mostly the point of Watson's existence in the Sherlock Holmes stories. So when, (or if?), we get the real explanation at all it should be through Sherlock explaining to Watson. If that doesn't happen, I suppose I'll still tune in for Sherlock s4, but then again, I watch Hollyoaks so that's not saying much. I would like a definitive (and better) explanation of the fall, mainly because the current explanation isn't very good. A lot of people have moaned that Moffat had promiwee something better. I'm not bothered about what he has or hasn't said outside the programme. To me, what's important is whether it hangs together as a coherent story. I'll wait until the end of series 3, to see if it feels like a gap or not. Of course, by then, there'll be another cliffhanger to worry about. |
|
|
|
|
|
#138 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,180
|
Quote:
I don't know if your post has been answered yet (haven't caught up yet), but yes, there have been.
For example: in RF episode, these were on the walls: ETA: links don't work. ETA2: Here's one of them: http://www.pinterest.com/pin/64880050854538924/ Eater, I'm specifically looking for the one in the scene in Kitty Riley's flat with Richard Brook. Perhaps someone else can provide a link with a pic? It's also in a post on one of the Sherlock threads here, somewhere. http://imgur.com/6ZDtDnw This one? The shot started right on the 'make believe' before focussing on Sherlock. Definitely intentional. |
|
|
|
|
|
#139 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Wilderness
Posts: 13,088
|
Den of Geek Spoiler-Free Review Quote:
The story is case-based from the off, blending character and relationship work in with the action. And there’s plenty of that. Break-ins, gunshots, helicopter flights… it’s a packed, visually exciting ninety minutes. Director Nick Hurran (The Day Of The Doctor) doesn’t just visit Sherlock’s Mind Palace, but gives us the deluxe tour. Full ArticleSteven Moffat's script is characteristically clever stuff, weaving in and updating whole story elements, not just names and nods, from Conan Doyle. Moffat balances emotion with intrigue and rare moments of leavening humour in His Last Vow, building effectively upon the previous episodes' character work while keeping the case and the villain centre stage. ** The Mirror Spoiler-Free Review Quote:
BBC Drama Controller Ben Stephenson summed it up at the BAFTA screening when he said there were "mouth dropping twists" and added: "It is really f***ng good."
Full Article
|
|
|
|
|
|
#140 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,180
|
My combining theory for the final episode:
Spoiler
|
|
|
|
|
|
#141 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 3,703
|
Quote:
My combining theory for the final episode:
Spoiler
|
|
|
|
|
|
#142 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,180
|
Quote:
Lots of good, and very plausible theories there. Nice work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#143 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 498
|
Quote:
First guy:
https://31.media.tumblr.com/cff10786...SWM1qiv5yk.png https://31.media.tumblr.com/860dbb51...tE01qiv5yk.png Second guy: https://31.media.tumblr.com/dfd634bd...3dr1qiv5yk.png https://31.media.tumblr.com/05eeffba...Y6B1qiv5yk.png And older grey haired guy: https://31.media.tumblr.com/ae621744...5si1qiv5yk.png Crikey, Slipknot have let themselves go. |
|
|
|
|
|
#144 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,739
|
Can i just wade in on the cliffhanger thing... I'm sure it's already been mentioned but this comment:
'We knew right from the start how we were going to do it. 'But we had absolutely no idea it would take on the epic proportions it has so that really by the time we came to actually do it we really had to address the fact it had become so huge and there are only so many ways you can jump off a building onto the pavement.' Makes me think there isn't much more to come. |
|
|
|
|
|
#145 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Wilderness
Posts: 13,088
|
DigitalSpy 12 Teasers Cultbox Dialogue Teasers View at your discretion. Quote:
Freeman commented: "It’s particularly important you end on a fantastic third one and the third episode in the third series is stellar. Everyone’s work on it is great and it’s a Steven Moffat special which is always good, but they are all so good! I was very, very excited when I read this one – it’s one of the best scripts I’ve ever read."
|
|
|
|
|
|
#146 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Bath
Posts: 1,036
|
Quote:
I agree with you. It does matter.
That's the whole point of a cliffhanger. If you set up a great cliffhanger then you're effectively promising a great payoff for when people tune back in next time. |
|
|
|
|
|
#147 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Bath
Posts: 1,036
|
Quote:
If they don't give a more satisfactory resolution to the last cliffhanger I don't think it will matter. People will just assume that whatever cliffhanger is at the end of s3 won't get a proper resolution anyway, and lose interest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#148 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Wilderness
Posts: 13,088
|
Cast & Crew warning to avoid any previews by The Guardian due to some spoilers they may have let slip. I won't be looking to verify
|
|
|
|
|
|
#149 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 80,198
|
Quote:
I think it's a shame to want or need to be spoon fed absolutes by a storyteller. I'm fine with how it's been left. I really don't care any more about the issue.
Cliffhangers are ALWAYS exciting, but they are NEVER satisfying enough when resolved, some better than others mind. Sherlock's was good ENOUGH, and the fun has been HAD, time to move on. |
|
|
|
|
|
#150 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,180
|
Quote:
Cast & Crew warning to avoid any previews by The Guardian due to some spoilers they may have let slip. I won't be looking to verify
![]() edit: online at least, not sure if you meant in print? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:33.



