• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
About time the MAN comes out of it worse.
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
WhyHelloWorld
08-01-2014
Haha!

Get Lee Out chants!

Pretty much EVERYONE chanting it! HIS FACE! PRICELESS!
chavet
08-01-2014
I know. Is that the first time it's ever happened (excluding non-relationship chants for, say, Sezer)?
Luxray
08-01-2014
I was hoping for it but I wasn't really expecting it. I figured it'd go to Jasmine/Luisa.
Lucky lad34
08-01-2014
I,m also made up.the dirty lying two faced scum bag,god only knows how bad he is in normal life if he,s like this on tv,well actually there,s probably thousands of victims who know
essexboyash
08-01-2014
Were they chanting Get Lee out? I wasn't sure if it was Lee or Liz?
Jacs75
08-01-2014
I think he deserves the chants. Okay the girls are not exactly innocent but he didn't handle that situation very well.
dtorre
08-01-2014
Is this the feminist man-haters thread? I noticed the few chants there were were from women in the crowd
maureens
08-01-2014
Originally Posted by essexboyash:
“Were they chanting Get Lee out? I wasn't sure if it was Lee or Liz?”

Definately Lee and he heard hence the tears(that will be why he is crying i think)
Alrightmate
08-01-2014
Originally Posted by dtorre:
“Is this the feminist man-haters thread? I noticed the few chants there were were from women in the crowd”

I think women are more able to empathize with someone getting the piss taken out of them like this.
AOTB
08-01-2014
Originally Posted by dtorre:
“Is this the feminist man-haters thread? I noticed the few chants there were were from women in the crowd”

I am man and I must say it's refreshing to hear the man get the 'Get x out' chants as hackneyed and awful as they always are.

I was pretty stunned at the support/ bias towards the likes of Daley (and against the girl who he put his hands on) in times gone by.

Whilst Lee is no Daley, on a tv show where you know you get a baying mob of morons attend, why not let the guy have it for a change? It's just a tv show after all.

No biggie really in the greater scheme of things, is it and I'm sure he won't be psychologically damaged for ever if at all. It may even make him re-access how he acts though which will be no bad thing.
Jenbonjovi
08-01-2014
Originally Posted by dtorre:
“Is this the feminist man-haters thread? I noticed the few chants there were were from women in the crowd”

Yes. Cheerio!
Jenbonjovi
08-01-2014
Originally Posted by AOTB:
“I am man and I must say it's refreshing to hear the man get the 'Get x out' chants as hackneyed and awful as they always are.

I was pretty stunned at the support/ bias towards the likes of Daley (and against the girl who he put his hands on) in times gone by.

Whilst Lee is no Daley, on a tv show where you know you get a baying mob of morons attend, why not let the guy have it for a change? It's just a tv show after all.

No biggie really in the greater scheme of things, is it and I'm sure he won't be psychologically damaged for ever if at all. It may even make him re-access how he acts though which will be no bad thing.”

Very well said, unlike my post.
eyespy
08-01-2014
Originally Posted by AOTB:
“I am man and I must say it's refreshing to hear the man get the 'Get x out' chants as hackneyed and awful as they always are.

I was pretty stunned at the support/ bias towards the likes of Daley (and against the girl who he put his hands on) in times gone by.

Whilst Lee is no Daley, on a tv show where you know you get a baying mob of morons attend, why not let the guy have it for a change? It's just a tv show after all.

No biggie really in the greater scheme of things, is it and I'm sure he won't be psychologically damaged for ever if at all. It may even make him re-access how he acts though which will be no bad thing.”

Daley was never up for eviction to get the chants, Lee is the only one to do any wrong in this situation as it was one created by him.
An Thropologist
08-01-2014
Originally Posted by AOTB:
“I am man and I must say it's refreshing to hear the man get the 'Get x out' chants as hackneyed and awful as they always are.

I was pretty stunned at the support/ bias towards the likes of Daley (and against the girl who he put his hands on) in times gone by.

Whilst Lee is no Daley, on a tv show where you know you get a baying mob of morons attend, why not let the guy have it for a change? It's just a tv show after all.

No biggie really in the greater scheme of things, is it and I'm sure he won't be psychologically damaged for ever if at all. It may even make him re-access how he acts though which will be no bad thing.”

Yes I agree. I have been reminded of Rianna and Danica who were accused of playing the guys off against one another and the way they were censured in the house and by the show and vilified in extremis on here.
HonestLee
08-01-2014
Ha! That was BLISS!!

I can't deny I enjoyed that

I can't

no seriously I can't deny it

Lees using all the denial

knocked out half the countrys supply apparently
Boofie
08-01-2014
Agreed! loved the cheers for her when they were with Emma
SCOUSE-DUDE
08-01-2014
You know what?, I reckon this could be a turning point for Lee. Sort of like Ayslene BB7(correct the spelling for me please) type redemption.
eyespy
08-01-2014
Originally Posted by An Thropologist:
“Yes I agree. I have been reminded of Rianna and Danica who were accused of playing the guys off against one another and the way they were censured in the house and by the show and vilified in extremis on here.”

The public are consistent, Lee is accused playing the girls off and getting the grief for it.
AOTB
08-01-2014
Originally Posted by Jenbonjovi:
“Very well said, unlike my post. ”

Ha ha, and thank you!

Originally Posted by eyespy:
“Daley was never up for eviction to get the chants, Lee is the only one to do any wrong in this situation as it was one created by him.”

Perhaps I should have used a different example, but Daley still illustrates my point, regardless whether he faced chants or not.

The OP is referring also to where men generally get an easier ride than women, especially when it comes to being a 'player' etc.

Daley was the worst example of this I have seen in recent times by quite some margin. I don't claim that Hazel was a saint, far from it, but to to see some people defending him and slating her (given how he acted in that safe house) was pretty astonishing to me. What I found even more amazing however was that it wasn't just blokes giving the old 'yeah but he's a lad, and didn't mean anything by it, innit' type response but some women effectively saying she was in some way (partly) responsible for it.

That's all.
dtorre
08-01-2014
Originally Posted by AOTB:
“I am man and I must say it's refreshing to hear the man get the 'Get x out' chants as hackneyed and awful as they always are.

I was pretty stunned at the support/ bias towards the likes of Daley (and against the girl who he put his hands on) in times gone by.

Whilst Lee is no Daley, on a tv show where you know you get a baying mob of morons attend, why not let the guy have it for a change? It's just a tv show after all.

No biggie really in the greater scheme of things, is it and I'm sure he won't be psychologically damaged for ever if at all. It may even make him re-access how he acts though which will be no bad thing.”

I don't see what is 'refreshing' about it since there have been plenty of times guys have got the flack from the rent-a-mob. The Daley situation was manufactured by BB because their series was badly tanking and they needed some 'controversy'. People are still talking about Sezer and that was 7 years ago. Personally I don't give a toss about Lee, never heard of him until he came on this show, but the feminist anti-male bias on here is sickening
dtorre
08-01-2014
Originally Posted by AOTB:
“Daley was the worst example of this I have seen in recent times by quite some margin. I don't claim that Hazel was a saint, far from it, but to to see some people defending him and slating her (given how he acted in that safe house) was pretty astonishing to me. What I found even more amazing however was that it wasn't just blokes giving the old 'yeah but he's a lad, and didn't mean anything by it, innit' type response but some women effectively saying she was in some way (partly) responsible for it.

That's all.”

She was partly responsible, do you even remember what happened? She was literally asking for it. If she hadn't acted like an idiot the situation wouldn't have happened
sandy50
08-01-2014
hope Lees tears don't result in sympathy for him - diddums - 30 and still a **** !
AOTB
08-01-2014
Originally Posted by dtorre:
“I don't see what is 'refreshing' about it since there have been plenty of times guys have got the flack from the rent-a-mob. The Daley situation was manufactured by BB because their series was badly tanking and they needed some 'controversy'. People are still talking about Sezer and that was 7 years ago. Personally I don't give a toss about Lee, never heard of him until he came on this show, but the feminist anti-male bias on here is sickening”

It's refreshing as in my opinion the bias or 'flack' is not equally balanced or proportionately shared between men and women. Not by a country mile.

As for the Daley situation, I am fully aware of how tv works including editing, production team objectives, character manipulation etc.. but in no way can any 'manufacturing' by BB justify how he acted towards Hazel. Excuse my bluntness but for me that's a weak excuse.

I take the BIB on board, and yes I think there is a lot of inequality on here regarding gender, but I haven't seen a hell of a lot of 'feminist anti-males' on here if I'm being honest with you.
sandy50
08-01-2014
Originally Posted by dtorre:
“She was partly responsible, do you even remember what happened? She was literally asking for it. If she hadn't acted like an idiot the situation wouldn't have happened”

are you a bloke ???
she let him get close and got carried away and he wanted her to get himself off, and he did - and now he's doing the ..@you shouldn't have expected it to be anything other than fun@' line which is his get out, because he wanted to try his luck with easy Jasmine (his mates are watching and he's an immature little boy)

Casey obviously didn't expect a full on relationship , but he talked the talk with her and flattered her, because it was 'convenient' - but he was disrespectful and she was just too vulnerable, and she's sensitive and feels shown up on National TV, which is natural - he went from swapping saliva and sleeping with her to jumping on another female HM living in the same space and getting up to the same thing and more in the toilet with Jasmine to get off again.

I think Jasmine's worse for letting Lee ,who she'd seen get close to Casey, jump on her and her just oblige and take things so far with him ! Lee ??? he's not even attractive - punching way above his weight with both of them ! Hope fit guy goes in and Jasmine tosses Lee aside and he gets taste of his own medicine !
AOTB
08-01-2014
Originally Posted by dtorre:
“She was partly responsible, do you even remember what happened? She was literally asking for it. If she hadn't acted like an idiot the situation wouldn't have happened”

It's a slippery slope from saying she was 'asking for it' or she somehow deserved it to those who claim women who go on a night out and 'dress like sluts' are 'asking for it' too.

Not saying you're saying this, but I'm sure you take my point.

Yes I remember what happened thanks and I'm pretty sure she didn't 'literally ask' for him to be physically aggressive and put his hands on her in the manner that he did. Perhaps you saw something I didn't? If so, feel free to enlighten me by all means.
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map