DS Forums

 
 

Casey letting Lee know she wasn't wearing any underwear..


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-01-2014, 23:27
Sylvia
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 14,231
She is flirting - she can't help herself. Desperate.

He will worm his way back into her good books (if he ever left them).

She knows exactly what she is doing imho.

As I said on another thread, fool me once, shame on you!! Fool me twice, shame on me!!
The woman has no shame, saying something like that on national TV!
Sylvia is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 08-01-2014, 23:41
Veri
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 90,778
I hope not. We'll know soon enough.

To be honest, I thought she was explaining why she was reluctant to bend down and look at things, no more than that.
But why wasn't she wearing underwear?

Was she thinking "I might be evicted tonight; better leave the underwear off"?
Veri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2014, 23:46
whatever54
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 6,098
But why wasn't she wearing underwear?

Was she thinking "I might be evicted tonight; better leave the underwear off"?
Couldn't with that dress apparently.

Her halo dropped a bit for me when she said that, no need. Unless she is playing the long game and teasing him to then say 'jog on', that would be good.
whatever54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2014, 23:57
Scarlet O'Hara
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,586
It's quite natural when you've been rejected to still want them to want you even if you don't want them. I think she was trying to titillate him, but she's barking up the wrong tree I reckon cos Lee has soooo gone off her now he's infatuated with Jasmine. In fact, I predict he'll feel positively turned off by her if he holds her responsible for his reaction tonight.
Scarlet O'Hara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2014, 00:19
Veri
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 90,778
Couldn't with that dress apparently.

Her halo dropped a bit for me when she said that, no need. Unless she is playing the long game and teasing him to then say 'jog on', that would be good.
If so, that just moves the question to: why was she wearing a dress that wouldn't let her wear underwear?
Veri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2014, 00:27
mysty211
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,885
She's been trying tease him still in a way.
"12.13am: Casey just asked Lee if he's after a spanking tonight. "That ship has sunk, hasn't it?" he replies. Yep. "
mysty211 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2014, 00:28
chea
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,743
She's been trying tease him still in a way.
"12.13am: Casey just asked Lee if he's after a spanking tonight. "That ship has sunk, hasn't it?" he replies. Yep. "
Pathetic
chea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2014, 00:30
whatever54
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 6,098
If so, that just moves the question to: why was she wearing a dress that wouldn't let her wear underwear?
Good point especially with the papz increasingly doing upskirt shots, surely on that stage it would be risky. I'd have worn a difference dress.
whatever54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2014, 00:31
misslibertine
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Strawberry Fields
Posts: 13,722
If so, that just moves the question to: why was she wearing a dress that wouldn't let her wear underwear?
I imagine a lot of girls (particularly celeb ones) who wear tight, bodycon/bandage dresses have to forgo their underwear in order to avoid VPL. I don't think it's a massively uncommon thing.
misslibertine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2014, 00:34
TerryM22
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 17,987
I imagine a lot of girls (particularly celeb ones) who wear tight, bodycon/bandage dresses have to forgo their underwear in order to avoid VPL. I don't think it's a massively uncommon thing.
I'm all for it.
TerryM22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2014, 00:36
Veri
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 90,778
I imagine a lot of girls (particularly celeb ones) who wear tight, bodycon/bandage dresses have to forgo their underwear in order to avoid VPL. I don't think it's a massively uncommon thing.
It seems a rather strange thing to do on national tv, especially when (so far as you know) might be evicted and so have cameras continuously on you.
Veri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2014, 00:37
misslibertine
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Strawberry Fields
Posts: 13,722
It seems a rather strange thing to do on national tv, especially when (so far as you know) might be evicted and so have cameras continuously on you.
I wouldn't personally, but I did think her figure looked amazing in the dress, so perhaps that's why she decided to just go with it regardless.
misslibertine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2014, 00:38
whatever54
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 6,098
....
whatever54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2014, 00:42
mysty211
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,885
Most girls wear underwear under dresses it's only a few that wouldn't wear underwear.
mysty211 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2014, 01:02
honeythewitch
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 31,227
If so, that just moves the question to: why was she wearing a dress that wouldn't let her wear underwear?
Especially coming down slippy steps in high shoes.
honeythewitch is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:49.