• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Casey letting Lee know she wasn't wearing any underwear..
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
Sylvia
08-01-2014
Originally Posted by Cornchips:
“She is flirting - she can't help herself. Desperate.

He will worm his way back into her good books (if he ever left them).

She knows exactly what she is doing imho.

As I said on another thread, fool me once, shame on you!! Fool me twice, shame on me!!”

The woman has no shame, saying something like that on national TV!
Veri
08-01-2014
Originally Posted by wonkeydonkey:
“I hope not. We'll know soon enough.

To be honest, I thought she was explaining why she was reluctant to bend down and look at things, no more than that.”

But why wasn't she wearing underwear?

Was she thinking "I might be evicted tonight; better leave the underwear off"?
whatever54
08-01-2014
Originally Posted by Veri:
“But why wasn't she wearing underwear?

Was she thinking "I might be evicted tonight; better leave the underwear off"?”

Couldn't with that dress apparently.

Her halo dropped a bit for me when she said that, no need. Unless she is playing the long game and teasing him to then say 'jog on', that would be good.
Scarlet O'Hara
08-01-2014
It's quite natural when you've been rejected to still want them to want you even if you don't want them. I think she was trying to titillate him, but she's barking up the wrong tree I reckon cos Lee has soooo gone off her now he's infatuated with Jasmine. In fact, I predict he'll feel positively turned off by her if he holds her responsible for his reaction tonight.
Veri
09-01-2014
Originally Posted by whatever54:
“Couldn't with that dress apparently.

Her halo dropped a bit for me when she said that, no need. Unless she is playing the long game and teasing him to then say 'jog on', that would be good.”

If so, that just moves the question to: why was she wearing a dress that wouldn't let her wear underwear?
mysty211
09-01-2014
She's been trying tease him still in a way.
"12.13am: Casey just asked Lee if he's after a spanking tonight. "That ship has sunk, hasn't it?" he replies. Yep. "
chea
09-01-2014
Originally Posted by mysty211:
“She's been trying tease him still in a way.
"12.13am: Casey just asked Lee if he's after a spanking tonight. "That ship has sunk, hasn't it?" he replies. Yep. "”

Pathetic
whatever54
09-01-2014
Originally Posted by Veri:
“If so, that just moves the question to: why was she wearing a dress that wouldn't let her wear underwear?”

Good point especially with the papz increasingly doing upskirt shots, surely on that stage it would be risky. I'd have worn a difference dress.
misslibertine
09-01-2014
Originally Posted by Veri:
“If so, that just moves the question to: why was she wearing a dress that wouldn't let her wear underwear?”

I imagine a lot of girls (particularly celeb ones) who wear tight, bodycon/bandage dresses have to forgo their underwear in order to avoid VPL. I don't think it's a massively uncommon thing.
TerryM22
09-01-2014
Originally Posted by misslibertine:
“I imagine a lot of girls (particularly celeb ones) who wear tight, bodycon/bandage dresses have to forgo their underwear in order to avoid VPL. I don't think it's a massively uncommon thing.”

I'm all for it.
Veri
09-01-2014
Originally Posted by misslibertine:
“I imagine a lot of girls (particularly celeb ones) who wear tight, bodycon/bandage dresses have to forgo their underwear in order to avoid VPL. I don't think it's a massively uncommon thing.”

It seems a rather strange thing to do on national tv, especially when (so far as you know) might be evicted and so have cameras continuously on you.
misslibertine
09-01-2014
Originally Posted by Veri:
“It seems a rather strange thing to do on national tv, especially when (so far as you know) might be evicted and so have cameras continuously on you.”

I wouldn't personally, but I did think her figure looked amazing in the dress, so perhaps that's why she decided to just go with it regardless.
whatever54
09-01-2014
Originally Posted by TerryM22:
“I'm all for it.”

....
mysty211
09-01-2014
Most girls wear underwear under dresses it's only a few that wouldn't wear underwear.
honeythewitch
09-01-2014
Originally Posted by Veri:
“If so, that just moves the question to: why was she wearing a dress that wouldn't let her wear underwear?”

Especially coming down slippy steps in high shoes.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map