|
||||||||
Did they tell us about the immunity? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 21,530
|
Did they tell us about the immunity?
First off, this isn't a complainer thread. No, I haven't phoned Ofcom (
), I'm not accusing them of misleading the voters, I don't mind about Casey and Lee being immune, I didn't even vote. (I assume they're immune anyway, considering nominations are apparently tonight, while they're supposedly "evicted".I just think it's something they should let voters know. I know most people probably assumed that nominations would happen while the moved couple were in the Bolt Hole, but they usually tell us regardless don't they? I don't personally mind, I just think some would like to have known they were helping to give someone immunity. Hey, they could have and I might have missed it. If so, I'll gladly admit to being a prize fool. ![]() But, yeah, this isn't a moan thread, I'm just genuinely curious if they did tell us they'd be immune and if not, that's strange as they usually do. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13,451
|
I don't think they explicitly stated it but it was pretty obvious? They wouldn't be able to be nominated whilst in the secret house.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 21,530
|
Quote:
I don't think they explicitly stated it but it was pretty obvious? They wouldn't be able to be nominated whilst in the secret house.
I mean, my thought was that, as they didn't state it, it's not impossible that some would not automatically assume that noms would happen tonight and weren't aware their voting could help them become immune, but as you suggest most likely assumed anyway. But mainly I was just curious as to if I'd missed something.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London
Posts: 19,833
|
It wasn't mentioned - and you are right. We should have been told although I doubt it would have made much difference to the result.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,521
|
Obviously they'd be immune.
"It's time for nominations housemates, so please vote for two of your fellow housemates, including the two who have just left as they are in a secret house!" Did they really need to tell us? (Insert roll eyes smiley x 10 here) |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 67,823
|
They didn't say it and technically they should have done i suppose.
It was a given though tbh. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kessingland, Suffolk
Posts: 85,565
|
Quote:
It wasn't mentioned - and you are right. We should have been told although I doubt it would have made much difference to the result.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London
Posts: 19,833
|
Quote:
Were we told that the couple that would go into the Safe House for the first time in BB14 would be immune??
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:27.

), I'm not accusing them of misleading the voters, I don't mind about Casey and Lee being immune, I didn't even vote. (I assume they're immune anyway, considering nominations are apparently tonight, while they're supposedly "evicted".

