I don't see why they would need to refund people? As they've revealed the twist people should know they're voting for a housemate to make the top 3 and not just to not be the one with the least amount of votes, it's not like they refund people when they vote to save a housemate and that housemate gets evicted...
Twist revealed for tomorrow (contains spoilers)
3 of 3
Do we know that Lee and Casey are immune for sure? Maybe one of them has to sacrifice themselves to leave, along with one of the bottom two of the other nominated HM's?
Originally Posted by Pinkminxy:
“Do we know that Lee and Casey are immune for sure? Maybe one of them has to sacrifice themselves to leave, along with one of the bottom two of the other nominated HM's?”
“Do we know that Lee and Casey are immune for sure? Maybe one of them has to sacrifice themselves to leave, along with one of the bottom two of the other nominated HM's?”
I can't see them wanting to lose either Lee or Casey at this point tbh.
Originally Posted by Cornchips:
“I can't see them wanting to lose either Lee or Casey at this point tbh.”
“I can't see them wanting to lose either Lee or Casey at this point tbh.”
That's what I'm thinking, but you never know. That could be the "shake up" they want to cause. Lull Lee and Casey into a false sense of security?
Originally Posted by Pinkminxy:
“Do we know that Lee and Casey are immune for sure? Maybe one of them has to sacrifice themselves to leave, along with one of the bottom two of the other nominated HM's?”
“Do we know that Lee and Casey are immune for sure? Maybe one of them has to sacrifice themselves to leave, along with one of the bottom two of the other nominated HM's?”
Thats what I was wondering or HMs choose either them or one of the legit bottom two.
Logged in to see if there was any more info.
Originally Posted by 027huds:
“The public vote isn't meaningless at all. I imagine Casey / Lee will choose which of the least two vote-getters will be evicted. In which case the votes are just as important, because otherwise your favourite will still be in danger.
It's hardly a new concept either, so I don't know why people are so offended by the idea. They did a similar thing in BB3, so its hardly like viewers are being exploited for their votes or anything.”
“The public vote isn't meaningless at all. I imagine Casey / Lee will choose which of the least two vote-getters will be evicted. In which case the votes are just as important, because otherwise your favourite will still be in danger.
It's hardly a new concept either, so I don't know why people are so offended by the idea. They did a similar thing in BB3, so its hardly like viewers are being exploited for their votes or anything.”
When did they do a similar thing in bb3?
I can't find any mention of anything very similar on Wikipedia.
Originally Posted by Cornchips:
“I can't see them wanting to lose either Lee or Casey at this point tbh.”
“I can't see them wanting to lose either Lee or Casey at this point tbh.”
They will lose Jasmine instead.
Originally Posted by _NiallDEE_:
“I don't see why they would need to refund people? As they've revealed the twist people should know they're voting for a housemate to make the top 3 and not just to not be the one with the least amount of votes, it's not like they refund people when they vote to save a housemate and that housemate gets evicted...”
“I don't see why they would need to refund people? As they've revealed the twist people should know they're voting for a housemate to make the top 3 and not just to not be the one with the least amount of votes, it's not like they refund people when they vote to save a housemate and that housemate gets evicted...”
They haven't revealed the twist.
Originally Posted by Veri:
“When did they do a similar thing in bb3?
I can't find any mention of anything very similar on Wikipedia.”
“When did they do a similar thing in bb3?
I can't find any mention of anything very similar on Wikipedia.”
First eviction, where Lynne and Jade had the most votes to evict and other HMs decided which one went.
Originally Posted by _NiallDEE_:
“First eviction, where Lynne and Jade had the most votes to evict and other HMs decided which one went.”
“First eviction, where Lynne and Jade had the most votes to evict and other HMs decided which one went.”
That's not what Wikipedia says happened. Wikipedia says:
In Week 1, instead of the housemates nominating and the public voting to evict, the public decided who to nominate and the housemates would decide who to evict.
So the public wasn't voting to evict. And I'm pretty sure the public knew what was happening too, unlike now.
Originally Posted by Veri:
“That's not what Wikipedia says happened. Wikipedia says:
In Week 1, instead of the housemates nominating and the public voting to evict, the public decided who to nominate and the housemates would decide who to evict.
So the public wasn't voting to evict. And I'm pretty sure the public knew what was happening too, unlike now.”
“That's not what Wikipedia says happened. Wikipedia says:
In Week 1, instead of the housemates nominating and the public voting to evict, the public decided who to nominate and the housemates would decide who to evict.
So the public wasn't voting to evict. And I'm pretty sure the public knew what was happening too, unlike now.”
They weren't far off. If you vote for someone to be nominated, it's likely there the ones you'd be voting for in a vote to evict.
Regardless, they had the basic idea right it seems.
Starting to think the bottom 2 will be Luisa and Liz . Jasmine I believe will get votes from people who are a fan of the Love Triangle storyline . Jim was always going to be safe and for some reason I have a feeling people will for Evander .
Originally Posted by Veri:
“That's not what Wikipedia says happened. Wikipedia says:
In Week 1, instead of the housemates nominating and the public voting to evict, the public decided who to nominate and the housemates would decide who to evict.
So the public wasn't voting to evict. And I'm pretty sure the public knew what was happening too, unlike now.”
“That's not what Wikipedia says happened. Wikipedia says:
In Week 1, instead of the housemates nominating and the public voting to evict, the public decided who to nominate and the housemates would decide who to evict.
So the public wasn't voting to evict. And I'm pretty sure the public knew what was happening too, unlike now.”
It's essentially the same thing, the only difference is the wording. C5 said at the end of tonight's show that viewers were only voting for the top 3 housemates, and also it says on the website, people will only get the wrong message if they're not paying enough attention.
Originally Posted by SillyBillyGoat:
“They weren't far off. If you vote for someone to be nominated, it's likely there the ones you'd be voting for in a vote to evict.”
“They weren't far off. If you vote for someone to be nominated, it's likely there the ones you'd be voting for in a vote to evict.”
"Likely" isn't good enough.
Originally Posted by _NiallDEE_:
“It's essentially the same thing, the only difference is the wording. C5 said at the end of tonight's show that viewers were only voting for the top 3 housemates, and also it says on the website, people will only get the wrong message if they're not paying enough attention.”
“It's essentially the same thing, the only difference is the wording. C5 said at the end of tonight's show that viewers were only voting for the top 3 housemates, and also it says on the website, people will only get the wrong message if they're not paying enough attention.”
The difference in wording matters, because it affects what viewers think they're doing. And the bb3 vote was a negative one -- who'd be nominated -- while this vote is to save. And so far as I can recall, the bb3 viewers know what was going to happen; we don't.
They were careful to phrase it.... who do you want to face the public vote..... to save.
So claiming you need to vote to save your top three.
I am sure they have had the lawyers all over it.
So claiming you need to vote to save your top three.
I am sure they have had the lawyers all over it.
Originally Posted by Veri:
“
The difference in wording matters, because it affects what viewers think they're doing. And the bb3 vote was a negative one -- who'd be nominated -- while this vote is to save. And so far as I can recall, the bb3 viewers know what was going to happen; we don't.”
“
The difference in wording matters, because it affects what viewers think they're doing. And the bb3 vote was a negative one -- who'd be nominated -- while this vote is to save. And so far as I can recall, the bb3 viewers know what was going to happen; we don't.”
But we do know? Okay they haven't made it explicitly clear, but they stated what's happening alongside the voting numbers at the end of last night's show and it's stated on the website. I don't get what your point about wording is because viewers are doing what exactly what they're doing - voting to SAVE a housemate and therefore getting them safe from the bottom two, with the elimination then being decided by Casey and Lee. I really don't see how this is any different to what happened in BB3, apart from the fact that that was a negative vote...
Has anyone found betting odds for the eviction?
EDIT: Forget that - found it http://www.oddschecker.com/tv/big-br.../next-eviction
EDIT: Forget that - found it http://www.oddschecker.com/tv/big-br.../next-eviction
Originally Posted by Joni M:
“Thats what I was wondering or HMs choose either them or one of the legit bottom two.
Logged in to see if there was any more info.”
“Thats what I was wondering or HMs choose either them or one of the legit bottom two.
Logged in to see if there was any more info.”
I think they might run into voting issues if the did that. If people knew that they may not have voted Lee and Casey into the bolt hole. It also makes the vote for the five up ATM fairly pointless if potentially none of them could go.
Sam's certainly dropped in popularity on there, hasn't she
Originally Posted by MisoSoup:
“Of course as BB haven't announced what the *house rocking* twist is actually going to be, it might be safe to assume that they are going to wait and see who the bottom two are before they decide which one of the possible scenarios they choose to enact...”
“Of course as BB haven't announced what the *house rocking* twist is actually going to be, it might be safe to assume that they are going to wait and see who the bottom two are before they decide which one of the possible scenarios they choose to enact...”
This ^
3 of 3
