DS Forums

 
 

The Happiness Patrol


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-01-2014, 21:09
andy1231
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,464

Just finished watching this story on DVd, not seen it since it was origionaly broadcast. God it was awfull ! From the obvious anti government (Thatcher) messages to the awfull acting by Sylvester and others, the forced inclusion of a black "blues" singer who jarred dreadfully within the context of the story, not to mention the awfull Fifi prop that never looked more than a rubber pet. As for the Candyman - God what were they thinking off. Bertie Bassett with a silly squeaky voice. Truly a dreadfull piece of Dr Who.
What do others think.
andy1231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 10-01-2014, 21:24
saladfingers81
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Steven Moffats pantry
Posts: 8,808
The Anti Thatcher stuff is one of the most interesting parts of the episodes. Gives it an extra layer and science fiction should never shy away from satire when it can be done well. The argument is how well was it done? Not brilliantly but a good attempt.

I don't see how the 'blues singer' was shoehorned in.

The Kandyman was very scary for kids of a certain age including me. It seems to be one of those accepted fan opinions that it was awful. Nope. I have spoken to many my age who grew up watching this who found it terrifying. Certainly more affecting than something like Silver Nemesis.

Its not great TV. Its certainly not great Who. But its mad enough to be an interesting curio as evidenced by its prominence in that Newsnight report last year.
saladfingers81 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2014, 23:05
bokonon
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,959
Had I realised it was supposed to be an anti-Tory polemic I might have been a lot more sympathetic.

But at the time it just made me feel despair at how low my once-favourite programme had sunk. The interesting thing about the McCoy era is the attempt to blame it all on the production and writing and to ignore his utterly dreadful performances. They were more like two notes (spluttering indignation and faux playfulness) than one but both registers were equally unconvincing.
bokonon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 01:08
1milescarf
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 193
I thought the ideas were really quite well thought out. I loved the way Helen gets dumped (from orbit!). The production design - right down to the painfully studio-bound go karts trying to be cars - was just a mess. I think they would have been better off just shooting it 'in the round' and be done with it.

As I said in another thread, I tend to watch that story and put this 'Sergio Leone' filter over the proceedings. Once you tune out the visuals and just soak the story in, it starts to work

McCoy definitely got better as time went on, but especially in Time and Rani, it's very painful to watch. Having said that, I don't think that anything was actually right about the show at that point. It's hard to choose a good production. There are just a few who are noticeably less flawed than the others I mean, just what the frick was McCoy supposed to be doing during that cliffhanger in Dragonfire? At the time I was like "WTF?? What the hell was he doing there?" I had to rewind it a few times and I still can't figure it out. Then there is the pantomime space monster lit like like Shooting Stars. I could see that they were trying to ape 'Alien' but the whole thing is just so pathetic that it literally hurt to watch it. Then, when the whole 'CBBC' vibe had been established, suddenly this guy's face melts off. Great effect but time and place guys!

If I don't stop now, I'll never finish ranting about the McCoy era.
1milescarf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 02:00
WhoFan55
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 414
I think it's a pretty bad episode but then I think McCoy's episodes are pretty bad in general. It's a shame because I like the idea of McCoy as the Doctor and the look of him as the Doctor but his acting was often too campy for me, the acting of the people around him was generally not very good, the scripts weren't very good and the background music was too loud and obtrusive.

Regarding "The Happiness Patrol", I liked the dog-like creature the best and I think the woman being upset over the creature dying was the only good scene in the episode.
WhoFan55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 02:03
WhoFan55
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 414

I mean, just what the frick was McCoy supposed to be doing during that cliffhanger in Dragonfire? At the time I was like "WTF?? What the hell was he doing there?" I had to rewind it a few times and I still can't figure it out.
I can't either but thank goodness Wonder-Clara was there to save him.
WhoFan55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 05:49
Mr Seta
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 294
Great -thanks for the useful feedback about the Happiness Patrol. I've never seen it before and from what I've viewed so far of McCoy's portal of Who, was erring on the side of "one of the few not to own" from the original series. Now this is a definite: "hire from the library to view only" type stories.

I'm getting close to owning all of the available stories up to Davison's last one, but beyond this deciding to purchase only a handful of the 6th & 7th's (the ones I feel worthy of owning). After seeing both the Twin Dilemma & Paradise Towers I made the call -these stories are so bad I refuse to own them. And I'm sure, from what I hear, many of the 1st and 2nd season of the 7th Doc also fall into this category.
Mr Seta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 08:58
Pointy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,733
I saw The Happiness Patrol on transmission when I was 10. My dad has never liked Who, but I convinced him to watch one of the episodes with me. It just so happened it was the one with The Kandyman... Never have I felt so embarrassed by the show! Needless to say, this stupid character only reinforced my dad's opinions. For that alone it warrants the title of my least favourite story ever.
There's just so many duds in the last five years of classic Who. The only dvds I own from that era (The Two Doctors and Silver Nemesis) came as parts of box sets, otherwise I would never have bought them.
Pointy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 09:12
daveyboy7472
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Peri's Cleavage
Posts: 14,690
Great -thanks for the useful feedback about the Happiness Patrol. I've never seen it before and from what I've viewed so far of McCoy's portal of Who, was erring on the side of "one of the few not to own" from the original series. Now this is a definite: "hire from the library to view only" type stories.

I'm getting close to owning all of the available stories up to Davison's last one, but beyond this deciding to purchase only a handful of the 6th & 7th's (the ones I feel worthy of owning). After seeing both the Twin Dilemma & Paradise Towers I made the call -these stories are so bad I refuse to own them. And I'm sure, from what I hear, many of the 1st and 2nd season of the 7th Doc also fall into this category.
I would recommend giving Remembrance Of The Daleks a go, it hasn't any of the Silliness of the rest of the era and is a very traditional story and even for the McCoy Era isn't that bad. Even if it's just to watch Ace beating up a Dalek with a baseball bat it's worth it!

I saw The Happiness Patrol on transmission when I was 10. My dad has never liked Who, but I convinced him to watch one of the episodes with me. It just so happened it was the one with The Kandyman... Never have I felt so embarrassed by the show! Needless to say, this stupid character only reinforced my dad's opinions. For that alone it warrants the title of my least favourite story ever.
There's just so many duds in the last five years of classic Who. The only dvds I own from that era (The Two Doctors and Silver Nemesis) came as parts of box sets, otherwise I would never have bought them.
Bad choice of story to pick to show your Dad!

It's a real shame about this story as I feel if it had been shown in an earlier era the idea behind it would have been done some justice. I think it's so badly executed on screen that the underlying moral message to the story which The Doctor tells Helen A in the last episode is mainly lost.

Which is a real shame.

daveyboy7472 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 09:36
Pointy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,733
Bad choice of story to pick to show your Dad!

It's a real shame about this story as I feel if it had been shown in an earlier era the idea behind it would have been done some justice. I think it's so badly executed on screen that the underlying moral message to the story which The Doctor tells Helen A in the last episode is mainly lost.

Which is a real shame.

It's almost as if fate wanted to stop my dad from appreciating anything Who-related! There's been a couple of other times I've got him to watch the show with me and the episode was not a particularly strong one again. lol
Pointy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 10:18
Mr Seta
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 294
[quote=daveyboy7472;70753698]I would recommend giving Remembrance Of The Daleks a go, it hasn't any of the Silliness of the rest of the era and is a very traditional story and even for the McCoy Era isn't that bad. Even if it's just to watch Ace beating up a Dalek with a baseball bat it's worth it!

Yeah, ta, I've seen that one & already got it. Remembrance is not a bad one & I managed to pick it for $1 (brand new -true story) from a website that I think misquoted some of the prices for a few of the Who DVD's during a sale (after a day they were corrected). Also I have Silver Nemesis (usual story -only because I wanted Revenge of the Cybermen).

Time & the Rani sounds like another real clunker (one to avoid). What about Delta & the Bannermen, Dragonfire & Timelash? I don't know much about them (aside from being not great). Anybody feel any of these are worth having in your collection (if you are not trying to own every last release)? I'd only consider buying one of them at a bargain price (maybe not quite to the $1 level).
Mr Seta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 10:27
darthbibble
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,725
Great script terrible execution.


There was a plan at one point to do it as a film noir, in black and white - shame they didn't follow through with that.
darthbibble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 13:01
Simon_Foston
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 334
Just finished watching this story on DVd, not seen it since it was origionaly broadcast. God it was awfull ! From the obvious anti government (Thatcher) messages to the awfull acting by Sylvester and others, the forced inclusion of a black "blues" singer who jarred dreadfully within the context of the story, not to mention the awfull Fifi prop that never looked more than a rubber pet. As for the Candyman - God what were they thinking off. Bertie Bassett with a silly squeaky voice. Truly a dreadfull piece of Dr Who.
What do others think.
That sums up what I think more or less exactly. It's utter garbage, made all the worse by the fact that they'd had Season 24 to sort out the problems and that by this point every story should have been a gem. In fact I hate all the stories in Season 25, but this one more than the others. No, maybe I loathe this one and Silver Nemesis just about equally. I'd like to go somewhere to get the minutes of my life back that I wasted watching them.
Simon_Foston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 13:25
DJGM
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Whitefield, Manchester
Posts: 3,726
The Happiness Patrol was bad, but Paradise Towers was much worse! The show had become a parody of itself!
DJGM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 13:40
The_Judge_
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Harrow, Middlesex
Posts: 2,445
I grew up watching these episodes, I basically retreated into a "Doctor Who Shell" for many years, didn't tell anyone I was a Doctor Who fan, didn't even watch the RTD reboot for a few years for fear it would be much the same.

All good since then thankfully, just going through the classic back catalogue now, almost at the end of Hartnells' time ...
The_Judge_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 15:19
1milescarf
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 193
Time and the Rani is in turns terribly painful to watch, and cruely amusing. Watching Sly's first scenes (the spoons, the delivery, the pretend tripping over himself) are literally painful.

Then you have Kate pulling off a deliciously evil piss-take of Bonnie Langford. I remember watching it with my hand on my mouth thinking "How is Bonnie going to walk onto the same soundstage as this woman after this?" The tetrap costumes were great. The ending... I won't spoil it as you probably wouldn't believe it if I told you. It's probably one of P & J's worst scripts.

Rememberance has a few problems. 1 - rice pudding 2. The Thals.

The effects, especially the monsters, were quite good during this time. It's kind of a shame that the Beeb were so determined to run the show into the ground. If they had put someone fresh in charge, it probably would never have been 'rested'.

I think that the vampire one (can't remember the title and can't be arsed to google it) was quite good. I remember it kind of fell apart at the end due to a throwaway brilliant monster (still looks great today) and some very Star Treky plotting about god-like aliens playing chess. I remember being pleasantly surprised by Nicholas Parsons. After seeing the appalling performances that Ken Dodd and Richard Briers turned in, we were all dreading any further 'big name' casting.

During this time of the show, we all learned to keep our fandom as a very guilty secret. It was a member of our group who opined that during the McCoy era it was "Less embarrassing to be caught masturbating at a Royal Garden Party than to admit to being a Doctor Who fan".
1milescarf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 17:03
daveyboy7472
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Peri's Cleavage
Posts: 14,690
[quote=Mr Seta;70754132]
I would recommend giving Remembrance Of The Daleks a go, it hasn't any of the Silliness of the rest of the era and is a very traditional story and even for the McCoy Era isn't that bad. Even if it's just to watch Ace beating up a Dalek with a baseball bat it's worth it!

Yeah, ta, I've seen that one & already got it. Remembrance is not a bad one & I managed to pick it for $1 (brand new -true story) from a website that I think misquoted some of the prices for a few of the Who DVD's during a sale (after a day they were corrected). Also I have Silver Nemesis (usual story -only because I wanted Revenge of the Cybermen).

Time & the Rani sounds like another real clunker (one to avoid). What about Delta & the Bannermen, Dragonfire & Timelash? I don't know much about them (aside from being not great). Anybody feel any of these are worth having in your collection (if you are not trying to own every last release)? I'd only consider buying one of them at a bargain price (maybe not quite to the $1 level).
To be honest though stories aren't great but I would always suggest you watch them and see what you think for yourself. What one person likes or dislikes may not be the same as you, you need to have your own opinion.

The Happiness Patrol was bad, but Paradise Towers was much worse! The show had become a parody of itself!
Couldn't agree more.

daveyboy7472 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 22:08
Michael_Eve
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 6,080
Well I like it.

Think it's a very good script and I was just the right age (and political persuasion!) to get and enjoy the subtext. Admittedly it suffers from being the completely studio bound Season 25 story, but think the direction is pretty good considering, and the soundtrack is unusually strong for this era.

Sheila Hancock is great and Sylvester has some good scenes. ("You like guns, don't you..." scene with the snipers, for example.) Not going to claim it's a misunderstood classic (it's not!) but it was a brave attempt at something different and am really rather fond of it.
Michael_Eve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 22:32
comedyfish
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia ♂
Posts: 19,829
I watched it again recently too. Didn't mind it too much
comedyfish is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 22:49
Fairyprincess0
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 9,700
I think sometimes stories that fall into the category of 'bad' doctor who can be more fun then 'good' doctor who.

You might not take them seriously, but at least their fun....
Fairyprincess0 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 22:53
stud u like
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Sunny Side Of The Street
Posts: 40,099
It is one of my favourites. I wasn't a Thatcher fan.
stud u like is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 22:55
Clackers
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 603
Happiness Patrol is no worse than the rubbish MOFFAT has given us since Silence in the Library (his one true great story).

Happiness Patrol was also supposed to be filmed in Film Noir (like black and white) but there was a decision from the BEEB hierarchy to change it to regular colour at the last minute.

I am campaigning for the Kandyman to come back to NUWHO, I think it would suit NUWHO better than the classic series.

I can imagine Tennant and Donna in Happiness Patrol easily.
Clackers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 23:12
Lady of Traken
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: London
Posts: 1,082
Well I like it.

Think it's a very good script and I was just the right age (and political persuasion!) to get and enjoy the subtext. Admittedly it suffers from being the completely studio bound Season 25 story, but think the direction is pretty good considering, and the soundtrack is unusually strong for this era.

Sheila Hancock is great and Sylvester has some good scenes. ("You like guns, don't you..." scene with the snipers, for example.) Not going to claim it's a misunderstood classic (it's not!) but it was a brave attempt at something different and am really rather fond of it.
I think u are right that it was a clever script and actually the supporting cast are for the most part very good on the themes within the script of oppression that dominates. I think what does. let it down is being totally studio bound which doesn't give any a sense of a huge city. The Patrol vehicles crawl along when you need a sense of menace. I do like the KAndyman though with the deceptive childlike nature he shows and the Candy kitchen. Sylvester is okay but he still rolls his rrr when he talks which can be annoying at times as I can't take him seriously then. Still fond of this one. Definitely not a clunker but it needed more work thinking about how it could look more like something from 1984 the film.
Lady of Traken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 23:28
bokonon
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,959
Happiness Patrol is no worse than the rubbish MOFFAT has given us since Silence in the Library (his one true great story).

Happiness Patrol was also supposed to be filmed in Film Noir (like black and white) but there was a decision from the BEEB hierarchy to change it to regular colour at the last minute.

I am campaigning for the Kandyman to come back to NUWHO, I think it would suit NUWHO better than the classic series.

I can imagine Tennant and Donna in Happiness Patrol easily.
Well given that the content was completely at odds with the aesthetic of film noir, the very possibility that they thought this was an option merely confirms that the production team had lost the plot. In fact probably the only mildy positive thing you could say about the travesty of a story is that the garish and tawdry production is a pretty good match for the sensationalist plotting.

Given that the Kandyman was clearly based on Bertie Bassett, the most appropriate tribute to the Happiness Patrol would not be to resurrect him but to base a new Who villain on a modern sweet. I am sure they could construct one out of Haribo. Then you could get a modern day clown to play the Doctor- say that Justin bloke off Justin's House on kids telly. Then they could cut the production budget to 10p. And then they could cancel the show again.

Woo Hoo- Happiness Patrol rules.
bokonon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2014, 13:19
1milescarf
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 193
I can imagine it being very moody and the scenes with Earl Sigma (had to Google that, I'm not that sad!) playing his harmonica benefiting enormously from some noire lighting.

It might also add to the satire element to have the thing in b&w. The Patrol would paint everything to look 'happy' and there would be no visible difference on a monochrome display that they had done anything to improve the place. Dramatic lighting would make the place look more depressing and stark and reinforce the comedic effect of 'making it happy'. Some inky shadows may just hide the stageyness of the sets. Double win there!

Also, it could be argued that if you had dramatic lighting, then there would at least be SOME drama in the production!!!

On the down side, you are entrusting the same team who shot Dragonfire to light this. Maybe the BBC showed some wisdom on the show after all
1milescarf is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:59.