Front page story:
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/tv/big-br...th-Linda-Nolan
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/tv/big-br...th-Linda-Nolan
Daily Star: Big Brother star Jim Davidson's romp with Linda Nolan
A fine headline indeed for a story about how nothing sexual has ever happened between Jim and Linda.
Must be a slow news day at the Daily Star if suspicions that two celebs have slept together are making the news.
I can't explain how much it fustrates me that so called professional journalists are allowed to write such rubbish on front covers and that there are such stupid people that will glance at the headline and take it as gospel, it's the same with these terrible weekly magazines that always pick on the same people, normally the loose woman, Richard and Judy or Lorraine Kelly, saying how their lives are in crisis on a weekly basis , the punishments should be far greater in this country for lazy journalism like this
Originally Posted by Digital Sid:
“More pressingly, what the hell is a romp?
”
“More pressingly, what the hell is a romp?
”
I believe it's a quaint old-fashioned way of saying Jim and Linda once had steamy, passionate sex, but in a 'Carry On' kind of way, where it's only ever implied and never actually seen or proven.
Originally Posted by ritchie2yk:
“I can't explain how much it fustrates me that so called professional journalists are allowed to write such rubbish on front covers and that there are such stupid people that will glance at the headline and take it as gospel, it's the same with these terrible weekly magazines that always pick on the same people, normally the loose woman, Richard and Judy or Lorraine Kelly, saying how their lives are in crisis on a weekly basis , the punishments should be far greater in this country for lazy journalism like this”
“I can't explain how much it fustrates me that so called professional journalists are allowed to write such rubbish on front covers and that there are such stupid people that will glance at the headline and take it as gospel, it's the same with these terrible weekly magazines that always pick on the same people, normally the loose woman, Richard and Judy or Lorraine Kelly, saying how their lives are in crisis on a weekly basis , the punishments should be far greater in this country for lazy journalism like this”
Even worse is when you open to read it, the magazine says something totally different. One reason why I no longer buy this junk
Originally Posted by ritchie2yk:
“I can't explain how much it fustrates me that so called professional journalists are allowed to write such rubbish on front covers and that there are such stupid people that will glance at the headline and take it as gospel, it's the same with these terrible weekly magazines that always pick on the same people, normally the loose woman, Richard and Judy or Lorraine Kelly, saying how their lives are in crisis on a weekly basis , the punishments should be far greater in this country for lazy journalism like this”
“I can't explain how much it fustrates me that so called professional journalists are allowed to write such rubbish on front covers and that there are such stupid people that will glance at the headline and take it as gospel, it's the same with these terrible weekly magazines that always pick on the same people, normally the loose woman, Richard and Judy or Lorraine Kelly, saying how their lives are in crisis on a weekly basis , the punishments should be far greater in this country for lazy journalism like this”
They should be rapped over the knuckles and fined heavily for publishing headlines with no foundation, nothing to back it up.
Despicable journalism . Any so called journalist should be ashamed to work for such a lying rag .
Originally Posted by Digital Sid:
“Front page story:
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/tv/big-br...th-Linda-Nolan”
“Front page story:
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/tv/big-br...th-Linda-Nolan”
Oh...shock, horror.
two celebs sleep together.
We saw it a few nights ago with Lee sleeping with Casey and then Lee sleeping with jasmine.
If Jim Davidson and Linda Nolan did sleep together then just fess up.
It was 30'odd years ago...if they did it who cares.
we all did things years ago.
i doubt whether Jim would remember, and it didn't happen , it was Luisa saying a what if........ blah blah nonsense
Originally Posted by jeanoj:
“Even worse is when you open to read it, the magazine says something totally different. One reason why I no longer buy this junk”
“Even worse is when you open to read it, the magazine says something totally different. One reason why I no longer buy this junk”
Ok magazine used to have quite an awe inspiring run of lying covers. One of them, at least a year before they got married, claimed they had photographs of Jade Goody and Jack Tweed getting married in prison. I can't even remember what they actually had - perhaps Jade was prevailed on to pose looking sadly at a wedding dress. Another one claimed to have pictures of Victoria Beckham in Tesco, but was actually pictures of Chanelle Hayes.
