• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Heavilly manipulated first eviction
Cracker_Cake
11-01-2014
Firstly I felt the first vote should have been to evict not stick them in a ruddy room for several days. Also letting Lee and Casey see the audience influenced their behaviour.

Secondly Jim and Liz or Jim, Liz and Luisa should have been up as they received the most nominations.

Thirdly the public should always decide who goes, not the HMs.

Giving Lee and Casey final choice always meant Luisa or Jasmine would have been safe if paired against other HMs.

CBB are changing the rules as they go along to protect certain HMs and keep their crappy Love Triangle thing going.
Leviathain
11-01-2014
The first eviction should always be either the whole house up or most nominated to be evicted by the public.

The constant meddling which protects certain individuals ruins the show. The secret room twist worked quite well with Speidi but totally sucked this time round.
orangeballoon
11-01-2014
It did look a bit "fixed" by the way it was done.
The first "cut" of votes and the clips shown after may have altered some of the voting, then you had the final twist. I would not bet against the power of the show editor!
Cranberryapple
11-01-2014
Originally Posted by Cracker_Cake:
“Firstly I felt the first vote should have been to evict not stick them in a ruddy room for several days. Also letting Lee and Casey see the audience influenced their behaviour.

Secondly Jim and Liz or Jim, Liz and Luisa should have been up as they received the most nominations.

Thirdly the public should always decide who goes, not the HMs.

Giving Lee and Casey final choice always meant Luisa or Jasmine would have been safe if paired against other HMs.

CBB are changing the rules as they go along to protect certain HMs and keep their crappy Love Triangle thing going.”



I agree, and had it been perhaps Luisa and Jasmine in the bottom 2, BB would likely have made the 'twist' so that Lee and Casey HAD to switch those 2 for another 2. So done with all the eviction twists now. No more voting for me until it's a clear and simple nomination / eviction process.
Abigail88
11-01-2014
*Big Brother has the power to change the rules at any time.

Frustrating, I know, but true.
Diane
11-01-2014
Just a quick question, how long is this on for and when is the next eviction please?
CLL Dodge
11-01-2014
Under the old style rules the first eviction would not have been after 5 days, fake or not.

The the first real eviction would have been Jim vs Liz with Liz gone.

Liz has been kept in by these twists.
Verence
11-01-2014
Originally Posted by Diane:
“Just a quick question, how long is this on for and when is the next eviction please?”

There will be eviction next Wednesday, Friday and the Wednesday after that before the final on January 24th.

I'm thinking that there will have to be some double evictions as if it's a single eviction each time there will be 8 HMs left on Final Night which would be too many even for C5
BellaRosa
11-01-2014
Originally Posted by Abigail88:
“*Big Brother has the power to change the rules at any time.

Frustrating, I know, but true.”

And to take money for votes that will not effect anything. So glad I have never given them a penny.
ucra girl
11-01-2014
I just think they didnt want Evander to stay too long in the show.He would get into more trouble and other big celebrities wouldnt agree to do it.You need an A lister but just for a short time.
*Laura*
11-01-2014
Originally Posted by ucra girl:
“I just think they didnt want Evander to stay too long in the show.He would get into more trouble and other big celebrities wouldnt agree to do it.You need an A lister but just for a short time.”

I tend to agree with this.

I do wonder after the "gayness is a disability" if his agent wanted him out ASAP. I think I'm right in saying that he does quite a lot of lucrative "meet the fans" type chats here in the UK (hence his comment to Emma "I thought I was popular in the UK") When they showed the "punch a horse" clip in the middle of the voting lines being re-opened it did seem that they were trying to get him in the bottom two.

It was also noticeable that Lee had already gone into the "hand-wringing, this is soooooo mean" mode before BB told them what they had to do. Which again led me to believe that although BB didn't want to lose Evander, keeping Luisa was the better option in terms of encouraging the obligatory American to join the show.

I believe that the public hadn't read the script because I think the producers needed Evander to be safe so that Blahblahblah and Casey could then save Luisa over Liz. Evander may have been a "boring" HM but, he was controversial and was shooting himself in the foot almost every time he expressed an opinion.
Dorkus_
11-01-2014
I agree to a certain extent. Some fiddling is allowed but in this eviction there was too much fiddling.

It really bothers me that Jasmine and Evander were nominated, BB should stare before nominations that the housemates who receive 2 or more noms are up.

I think the twist would have worked better if there were no nominations, all 10 were nominated and Lee and Casey had the final say between the bottom two.

No point in nominations if producers are going to basically put up whomever they want.
Isleepinthebuff
11-01-2014
Problem is, they had to save Jasmine and Luisa. The whole Lee / Jasmine and Casey storyline is the only thing they've got and Luisa will align herself to it.

Apart from the odd word-off from Linda and Jim, there isn't much else. Sam, Ollie and Lionel are like watching paint dry. Dappy has revealed his one trick - his knob. Liz is uneasy and won't let her barriers down.
Abigail88
11-01-2014
Originally Posted by CLL Dodge:
“Under the old style rules the first eviction would not have been after 5 days, fake or not.

The the first real eviction would have been Jim vs Liz with Liz gone.

Liz has been kept in by these twists.”

To be fair, him and Luisa have been kept in by a twist (Luisa now by two twists) as they got the fewest votes to save initially when they were handcuffed.

Although you could argue that the handcuff twist in the first place put them up for eviction
Abigail88
11-01-2014
Originally Posted by Verence:
“There will be eviction next Wednesday, Friday and the Wednesday after that before the final on January 24th.

I'm thinking that there will have to be some double evictions as if it's a single eviction each time there will be 8 HMs left on Final Night which would be too many even for C5”

I'm thinking Wednesday's eviction will be a double, follwed by a single, and then another double leaving 6 for the final
mysty211
11-01-2014
I reckon it was Liz vs Evander until Evander came out with the punching a horse and Liz stood up to him so many voted to keep her in.
danielleh
11-01-2014
I can only hope they put 5 people up for the sake of this week's twist. I do agree that they really need to explain the format of nominations.

Is it the three or more housemates with the most nominations? Is it anyone who receives at least 2 nominations (which is just stupid, in my opinion).
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map