Originally Posted by lombard:
“Interesting that you single out women and not both sexes.
To answer your question, it's acceptable since around the time that people won their civil rights, which allow them to have consensual sex with whomever and however many people they like. If peculiar moral guardians want to call those people names, they're also free to do so, but they can expect to be called names back.”
“Interesting that you single out women and not both sexes.
To answer your question, it's acceptable since around the time that people won their civil rights, which allow them to have consensual sex with whomever and however many people they like. If peculiar moral guardians want to call those people names, they're also free to do so, but they can expect to be called names back.”
I referred to women because the phrase was used to describe a woman. For no other reason.
And you didn't answer my question. I didn't ask since when it was acceptable to sleep around. I asked about why it needed a better name than 'sleeping around' if it is so virtuous? My question is about language and the palatability of certain phrases indicating underlying hypocrisy. Not about whether or not we agree that sleeping around is a good thing to do. Personally, I don't think there is an answer to that question. It is a matter of personal opinion.



