• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
OFFICIAL. Jim is a proven liar.
<<
<
1 of 9
>>
>
janna
16-01-2014
First he twisted the story about Luisa. He didn't ask if she had a husband and NOT at the start of the convo.
She said she has great fun with her daughter blah blah blah, and he piped up asking sneeringly didn't she "have a man" .

THEN he clearly called Linda "arshole" ................ and then blatantly denied it saying he doesn't use that word. I've heard him use it at least 4 times.
detroit city
16-01-2014
who cares he's the only comedy value in there
Cornchips
16-01-2014
he did not call her ar@ehole. He said "after", she heard "ar@ehole"
puppetangel
16-01-2014
He was playing her.
r0ry101
16-01-2014
Because the rules here seem to apply that Jim is a saint and can do no wrong and Linda is the devil completely, even when he lies he's allowed to get away with it
Veri
16-01-2014
Originally Posted by janna:
“First he twisted the story about Luisa. He didn't ask if she had a husband and NOT at the start of the convo.
She said she has great fun with her daughter blah blah blah, and he piped up asking sneeringly didn't she "have a man" .

THEN he clearly called Linda "arshole" ................ and then blatantly denied it saying he doesn't use that word. I've heard him use it at least 4 times.”

Thanks for posting that. I'll try to rewatch it to see if I can confirm that version.
kimindex
16-01-2014
Originally Posted by r0ry101:
“Because the rules here seem to apply that Jim is a saint and can do no wrong and Linda is the devil completely, even when he lies he's allowed to get away with it”

About right. The Frank Carson thing was pure malice.
HectorMcClure
16-01-2014
He did not call her an arsehole!

He said something about cooking her dinner.
kirstylouise666
16-01-2014
Originally Posted by janna:
“First he twisted the story about Luisa. He didn't ask if she had a husband and NOT at the start of the convo.
She said she has great fun with her daughter blah blah blah, and he piped up asking sneeringly didn't she "have a man" .

THEN he clearly called Linda "arshole" ................ and then blatantly denied it saying he doesn't use that word. I've heard him use it at least 4 times.”

What is wrong with asking if someone has a man in her life? It is like asking someone if they are married or have kids. Is that really suck a nasty question?
Henrik
16-01-2014
Linda is an arsehole.
~V~
16-01-2014
I replayed it. He did not call her an arsehole. I can hear her calling him one though.
HectorMcClure
16-01-2014
This has been her plan all along!

She has constantly been picking away at him, hoping he would slip up. The woman is vile.
anne_666
16-01-2014
Originally Posted by r0ry101:
“Because the rules here seem to apply that Jim is a saint and can do no wrong and Linda is the devil completely, even when he lies he's allowed to get away with it”

Spot on......
janna
16-01-2014
Originally Posted by Cornchips:
“he did not call her ar@ehole. He said "after", she heard "ar@ehole"”

Why would he call her "Linda after " .
He has dragged two dead men into that the snidey fool .
He disgusts me.
Percy Sugden
16-01-2014
Who cares? Its great telly!
Chris_P_White
16-01-2014
Originally Posted by kimindex:
“About right. The Frank Carson thing was pure malice.”

And Jim DID say "ask her about Frank Carson's dressing room" and not "is it about Frank Carson's dressing room"!

Jim is a liar. It's no wonder Linda doesn't like him.
Angie_Plasty
16-01-2014
Lying is the least of his long litany of offensive behaviour.

I haven't seen what you allege he''s done yet, or the circumstances around it, but I bet his gang on this forum will soon find a way to blame Linda for it.
pericom
16-01-2014
He said "after I cooked for her".
Cranberryapple
16-01-2014
Originally Posted by kirstylouise666:
“What is wrong with asking if someone has a man in her life? It is like asking someone if they are married or have kids. Is that really suck a nasty question?”

Something obviously happened between him and Linda's dead husband. He told Luisa to go and ask Linda about it. Pretty rotten if you ask me.

Edit. Think you're talking about something else.. My mistake
Betty Britain
16-01-2014
Janna ...
Jim did NOT call Linda an arsehole ... And I know because I have subtitles on

Also what is wrong with asking if Linda's problem with him has something to do with Frank Carsons dressing room
PinkPetal
16-01-2014
He really is an arsehole, he quite deliberately brought Linda's deceased husband into the foray, knowing it would upset her. He is lowest of the low, utter scum. Then playing the innocent victim.
floozie_21
16-01-2014
Originally Posted by pericom:
“He said "after I cooked for her".”

This. He didn't call her arsehole.
janna
16-01-2014
Originally Posted by kirstylouise666:
“What is wrong with asking if someone has a man in her life? It is like asking someone if they are married or have kids. Is that really suck a nasty question?”

Luisa was all happy about her single life and he was getting his digs in.
Misogynist git .
Cornchips
16-01-2014
Originally Posted by janna:
“Why would he call her "Linda after " .
He has dragged two dead men into that the snidey fool .
He disgusts me.”

He said "she did me up like a kipper Linda, after I made her dinner"

She heard "after" as "ar@ehole"
Mrs BBV
16-01-2014
Originally Posted by PinkPetal:
“He really is an arsehole, he quite deliberately brought Linda's deceased husband into the foray, knowing it would upset her. He is lowest of the low, utter scum. Then playing the innocent victim.”

He didn't bring Linda's husband into it......Linda did.
<<
<
1 of 9
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map