Originally Posted by rorybb:
“I think you could be right , although I'm trying to leave Jim's past out of my opinion of him or I would just really dislike him no matter what he did , and so far other then on a few occasions I havn't found him too bad , but it's a little difficult to forget some things
”
“I think you could be right , although I'm trying to leave Jim's past out of my opinion of him or I would just really dislike him no matter what he did , and so far other then on a few occasions I havn't found him too bad , but it's a little difficult to forget some things
”
why should you though, seriously? If remembering what a real nasty bastard he was in his adult life (and we're not talking about a one-off incident here) makes you hate him, so be it.
I understand the idea that people want to judge HMs on how they behave in the house, but I think there are boundaries. Would the same people who are telling us to forget Jim's past be telling us to forget Gary Glitter's past should he turn up on the show? Hell, his fans can't even talk about the likes of Linda without referring to her claiming benefits or the fact that her dead husband stole £20 from Frank Carson!
In any case, when there is suspicion (as you've highlighted with this thread) that his past behaviour might help explain his differing attitudes towards men and women now it's entirely appropriate to remember what sort of 'man' he was - and probably still is underneath the self-restraint his fans applaud him for.






It was Carol & Charlotte last year, surely by now HM's know what to expect?