My sisters stabbed me in the back' says Anne Nolan
Originally Posted by CLL Dodge:
“That was 2009. They all made up when Bernie was dying.”
“That was 2009. They all made up when Bernie was dying.”
Does not change the fact she did it.
Originally Posted by Will_Loz:
“Does not change the fact she did it.”
“Does not change the fact she did it.”
Who did what? It is an article about a long and unfathomable feud between Ann and Colleen. Did you even read it?
Originally Posted by wonkeydonkey:
“Who did what? It is an article about a long and unfathomable feud between Ann and Colleen. Did you even read it?”
“Who did what? It is an article about a long and unfathomable feud between Ann and Colleen. Did you even read it?”
It was also written in the Daily Mail. It looks more respectable than the Star but they are masters of making something out of nothing. Long, long articles all based on about a sentence of 'news' or information and lots of padding. Their shock prediction weather news stories, for instance, are hysterical (in both senses of the word) and usually wrong. Sells papers though.
Originally Posted by An Thropologist:
“It was also written in the Daily Mail. It looks more respectable than the Star but they are masters of making something out of nothing. Long, long articles all based on about a sentence of 'news' or information and lots of padding. Their shock prediction weather news stories, for instance, are hysterical (in both senses of the word) and usually wrong. Sells papers though.”
“It was also written in the Daily Mail. It looks more respectable than the Star but they are masters of making something out of nothing. Long, long articles all based on about a sentence of 'news' or information and lots of padding. Their shock prediction weather news stories, for instance, are hysterical (in both senses of the word) and usually wrong. Sells papers though.”
Yes but the almost exact charges were also on one of the Nolan Sisters website....pretty much accurate with what was said there....it may have been Denise's site but I cannot be 100% which one it was.Its pretty awful why a family would do that to each other, inparticular to Anne at the time who was desperate for money and suicidal, its also pretty awful that they seem to want to publicise every aspect of their feuds.
Originally Posted by An Thropologist:
“It was also written in the Daily Mail. It looks more respectable than the Star but they are masters of making something out of nothing. Long, long articles all based on about a sentence of 'news' or information and lots of padding. Their shock prediction weather news stories, for instance, are hysterical (in both senses of the word) and usually wrong. Sells papers though.”
“It was also written in the Daily Mail. It looks more respectable than the Star but they are masters of making something out of nothing. Long, long articles all based on about a sentence of 'news' or information and lots of padding. Their shock prediction weather news stories, for instance, are hysterical (in both senses of the word) and usually wrong. Sells papers though.”
The Daily Mail is not more respectable than any paper. The Star might go chasing cheap controversy headlines but The Mail is utter garbage who take "National Pride" way too far
Linda Nolan has certainly got up a few peoples noses lol.
The amount of ' dirt digging ' going on is so funny
The amount of ' dirt digging ' going on is so funny
Originally Posted by Cranberryapple:
“Linda Nolan has certainly got up a few peoples noses lol.
The amount of ' dirt digging ' going on is so funny”
“Linda Nolan has certainly got up a few peoples noses lol.
The amount of ' dirt digging ' going on is so funny
”
I agree with you there I can just imagine people trolling through any info they can find on the Nolan's since they were all born
Funny thing is I don't think Linda is even mentioned in this article at all, apart from to state that she was in the tour line up. It's mostly about Anne and Coleen. And to make it worse this article is from 2009 and things have mostly patched up. Ridiculous the type of things people post to try and berate Linda.
Originally Posted by greenyone:
“I agree with you there I can just imagine people trolling through any info they can find on the Nolan's since they were all born”
“I agree with you there I can just imagine people trolling through any info they can find on the Nolan's since they were all born
”
I'm sure somebody somewhere is doing that just now LOL
It's taken off big time
Originally Posted by Cranberryapple:
“I'm sure somebody somewhere is doing that just now LOL
It's taken off big time”
“I'm sure somebody somewhere is doing that just now LOL
It's taken off big time
”
They only have to go through DS forums from the time Coleen was in the house. Deniece Nolan's blog was well documented and very sad reading, both then and I assume now.
Quote:
“Isn't there a chance that she has been excluded from the tour simply because her sisters are horrified at the public washing of such dirty laundry when her father is no longer alive to defend himself?
”
“Isn't there a chance that she has been excluded from the tour simply because her sisters are horrified at the public washing of such dirty laundry when her father is no longer alive to defend himself?
”
Taken from that 2009 article.
It seems then that highlighted tactic has been used before then.
Originally Posted by RabidWolverine1:
“The Daily Mail is not more respectable than any paper. The Star might go chasing cheap controversy headlines but The Mail is utter garbage who take "National Pride" way too far”
“The Daily Mail is not more respectable than any paper. The Star might go chasing cheap controversy headlines but The Mail is utter garbage who take "National Pride" way too far”
Kind of my point really RW. If I ruled the world I would ban the Malicious immediately - dangerous, nasty beast in sheep's clothing IMO. Designed to inflame popular opinion and cause upset and fear. The star doesn't bother me as much because it doesn't appear to pretend to be something it isn't.
Originally Posted by An Thropologist:
“Kind of my point really RW. If I ruled the world I would ban the Malicious immediately - dangerous, nasty beast in sheep's clothing IMO. Designed to inflame popular opinion and cause upset and fear. The star doesn't bother me as much because it doesn't appear to pretend to be something it isn't.”
“Kind of my point really RW. If I ruled the world I would ban the Malicious immediately - dangerous, nasty beast in sheep's clothing IMO. Designed to inflame popular opinion and cause upset and fear. The star doesn't bother me as much because it doesn't appear to pretend to be something it isn't.”
My apologies i misread your wording
This is old news , basically Anne didn't do the tour because of Coleen . Coleen didnt even want to share the stage with Anne at the wedding described at the end of the article, the one I feel a bit sorry for is Maureen who was stuck in the middle being close to both Anne and the younger siblings ,I think she wanted Anne on the tour
Originally Posted by An Thropologist:
“Kind of my point really RW. If I ruled the world I would ban the Malicious immediately - dangerous, nasty beast in sheep's clothing IMO. Designed to inflame popular opinion and cause upset and fear. The star doesn't bother me as much because it doesn't appear to pretend to be something it isn't.”
“Kind of my point really RW. If I ruled the world I would ban the Malicious immediately - dangerous, nasty beast in sheep's clothing IMO. Designed to inflame popular opinion and cause upset and fear. The star doesn't bother me as much because it doesn't appear to pretend to be something it isn't.”
I couldn't agree more. The fear and malice and propaganda it peddles as news is so dangerous. And then there are the ostensibly 'inane' celebrity stories, riddled with the same hateful, intolerant crud as the rest of the paper.
There's literally only a tiny segment of the population that the Mail seems to tolerate, and even they have very strict caveats on what they must do, wear and look like.
