• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
You guys realize the Daily Star makes up stories, right?
michaelkegnan
20-01-2014
They said Dappy and Jasmine had sex. They also had quotes form Jasmine which were nonsense.

Stop believing that crap for Christs sake.
Jon_Heath
20-01-2014
One of the worst newspapers as far as truth goes
wonkeydonkey
20-01-2014
I think there are rules to reading Star stories.

1. If they mention a sexual act of any kind, it will be exaggerated by about a factor of 10.

2. If a 'friend' says something, they have invented it.

3. If someone is 'said to' be something, or have done something, they have invented it.

4. A 'romp' is a kiss; a 'sex act' is a grope; a 'sex act too disgusting to describe' is something involving a crotch and an kitchen implement.

5. An actual quote from a named source is probably true. They are not stupid.

6. A story involving someone like Madonna or Lady Gaga is always true, or at least copied verbatim from another paper that can afford fact checkers.
misslibertine
20-01-2014
Yes, most of us are well aware of this.
Pollyusa
20-01-2014
Originally Posted by wonkeydonkey:
“I think there are rules to reading Star stories.

1. If they mention a sexual act of any kind, it will be exaggerated by about a factor of 10.

2. If a 'friend' says something, they have invented it.

3. If someone is 'said to' be something, or have done something, they have invented it.

4. A 'romp' is a kiss; a 'sex act' is a grope; a 'sex act too disgusting to describe' is something involving a crotch and an kitchen implement.

5. An actual quote from a named source is probably true. They are not stupid.

6. A story involving someone like Madonna or Lady Gaga is always true, or at least copied verbatim from another paper that can afford fact checkers.”

They also often quote dialog from the show and I've always found it to be correct.

They do however conflate dialog to mislead using devices such as ... to indicate a break in the dialog.
SegaGamer
20-01-2014
Yes, that is why i never read such rubbish.
J Swift
20-01-2014
I never realised how bad it was until a friend of mine was on a reality show recently

They'd get hold of some old picture (like a holiday photo of her with an ex from years ago) and just make up a whole story around it out of nothing - 'spotted just before she entered with mystery man', and this stuff could mess people's relationships if anyone took it seriously

And everyone in the comments (on their site) just believes it without question ... It's not a newspaper - it's more like some very mentally ill person's blog
nanna7
20-01-2014
Oh no I thought they were all true lol
michaelkegnan
20-01-2014
Originally Posted by misslibertine:
“Yes, most of us are well aware of this.”

Apparently not a thread is devoted to slagging Lee off(as usual) based on his behavior with Luisa(according to DS).
EnglishRose19
20-01-2014
Yes. Everyone knows this.
misslibertine
20-01-2014
Originally Posted by michaelkegnan:
“Apparently not a thread is devoted to slagging Lee off(as usual) based on his behavior with Luisa(according to DS).”

I did say "most", not all.
michaelkegnan
20-01-2014
Originally Posted by wonkeydonkey:
“I think there are rules to reading Star stories.

1. If they mention a sexual act of any kind, it will be exaggerated by about a factor of 10.

2. If a 'friend' says something, they have invented it.

3. If someone is 'said to' be something, or have done something, they have invented it.

4. A 'romp' is a kiss; a 'sex act' is a grope; a 'sex act too disgusting to describe' is something involving a crotch and an kitchen implement.

5. An actual quote from a named source is probably true. They are not stupid.

6. A story involving someone like Madonna or Lady Gaga is always true, or at least copied verbatim from another paper that can afford fact checkers.”

So Jasmine really talked about Dappy's 'big black di*k' and that it would not fit in her mouth? Come on that is crap.
Pinkminxy
20-01-2014
Hopefully the people who started up the threads regarding Jasmine's "intentions" are reading. They was the ones believing her "story"

The majority are aware of the crap the Daily Star comes up with.
Fanntastik
20-01-2014
Originally Posted by wonkeydonkey:
“I think there are rules to reading Star stories.

1. If they mention a sexual act of any kind, it will be exaggerated by about a factor of 10.

2. If a 'friend' says something, they have invented it.

3. If someone is 'said to' be something, or have done something, they have invented it.

4. A 'romp' is a kiss; a 'sex act' is a grope; a 'sex act too disgusting to describe' is something involving a crotch and an kitchen implement.

5. An actual quote from a named source is probably true. They are not stupid.

6. A story involving someone like Madonna or Lady Gaga is always true, or at least copied verbatim from another paper that can afford fact checkers.”

LOL love it
misslibertine
20-01-2014
Originally Posted by michaelkegnan:
“So Jasmine really talked about Dappy's 'big black di*k' and that it would not fit in her mouth? Come on that is crap.”

The DM also reported that she said that. I don't know whether either paper just copied the story from the other though.
Veri
21-01-2014
Originally Posted by wonkeydonkey:
“I think there are rules to reading Star stories.

1. If they mention a sexual act of any kind, it will be exaggerated by about a factor of 10.

2. If a 'friend' says something, they have invented it.

3. If someone is 'said to' be something, or have done something, they have invented it.

4. A 'romp' is a kiss; a 'sex act' is a grope; a 'sex act too disgusting to describe' is something involving a crotch and an kitchen implement.

5. An actual quote from a named source is probably true. They are not stupid.

6. A story involving someone like Madonna or Lady Gaga is always true, or at least copied verbatim from another paper that can afford fact checkers.”

Even better papers than the Star don't always quote accurately, and they may also leave out words or relevant context in ways that distort the meaning.
MIKKIL
21-01-2014
Really thought everything they printed was absolute truth thanks for enlightening me
BlueStreak
21-01-2014
Originally Posted by michaelkegnan:
“Apparently not a thread is devoted to slagging Lee off(as usual) based on his behavior with Luisa(according to DS).”

Ah, any slagging off regarding Lee is most likely well justified and proven. What we can obviously see with our own eyes of his behaviour in the house isn't fictional.

stargazer61
21-01-2014
Originally Posted by MIKKIL:
“Really thought everything they printed was absolute truth thanks for enlightening me”

Well, so did I! I'm rocked to the core to find out that stories in the DS are not true. Most kind of the OP to enlighten us!
jazzyjazzy
21-01-2014
The guy who owns Channel 5 also owns the Star so it must be true
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map