• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Next eviction odds (LIZ FAV TO GO)
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
HectorMcClure
20-01-2014
http://www.oddschecker.com/tv/big-br.../next-eviction

EDIT: As I posted this the odds suddenly took a change...

Liz - 1/6
Sam - 6/1
Jim - 12/1

I just wonder if that's because of the highlights. With the housemates creating a huge drama because Sam was up that may actually encourage people to evict Sam. Liz still a big fav to go though.
Stuart25
20-01-2014
That may change after tonight's show.
HectorMcClure
20-01-2014
Originally Posted by Stuart25:
“That may change after tonight's show.”

In what way?
superstar111
20-01-2014
liz was 1/9 before the show so it's a bit lf a turn around!
StephenMoore
20-01-2014
Originally Posted by superstar111:
“liz was 1/9 before the show so it's a bit lf a turn around!”

Well either way they are insanely short odds
academia
20-01-2014
Originally Posted by HectorMcClure:
“http://www.oddschecker.com/tv/big-br.../next-eviction

EDIT: As I posted this the odds suddenly took a change...

Liz - 1/6
Sam - 6/1
Jim - 12/1

I just wonder if that's because of the highlights. With the housemates creating a huge drama because Sam was up that may actually encourage people to evict Sam. Liz still a big fav to go though.”

She was hilarious with the dead cat and so on. And then was faced with mass crkticism for her noms by all the people who nommdd her.
d love her to stay.
HectorMcClure
20-01-2014
Originally Posted by superstar111:
“liz was 1/9 before the show so it's a bit lf a turn around!”

Yeah, she was 1/8 as I posted this then suddenly changed to 1/6. Sam went from 9/1 to 6/1!
HectorMcClure
20-01-2014
Originally Posted by StephenMoore:
“Well either way they are insanely short odds ”

At least they're moving in the right direction. I hope Sam goes.
superstar111
20-01-2014
Originally Posted by StephenMoore:
“Well either way they are insanely short odds ”

Not really.. She was 1/10 week one and stayed.. on 2005, Orlaity wa 1/50 and stayed. thats insanely short..
HectorMcClure
20-01-2014
Check the odds now!

http://www.oddschecker.com/tv/big-br.../next-eviction

There's been a huge swing since the highlights show.

Sam has gone from 9/1 to 7/2.

Jim has gone from 9/1 to 16/1.

Liz has gone from 1/8 to 1/5.

It looks like the gap is closing between Sam and Liz. Her arrogant reaction to being nominated(along with the other housemates)may have backfired.

Jim is looking safe.
Oswald Mosley
20-01-2014
I would sincerely love Sam to go.

Would be one of those great eviction upset moments.
Tyyleer
21-01-2014
Originally Posted by Oswald Mosley:
“I would sincerely love Sam to go.

Would be one of those great eviction upset moments.”

I don't mind Sam but out of the three i would actually like her to go the most. Just because i think it will make great TV and the whole house would freak out.
wonkeydonkey
21-01-2014
Originally Posted by HectorMcClure:
“. Her arrogant reaction to being nominated(along with the other housemates)may have backfired.
”

When was she arrogant? She said less than almost anyone, just that she didn't think it was fair to be nominated for tactical reasons.

If anything, Sam is not arrogant ENOUGH. She needs a touch of Luisa swagger. It is particularly odd to single out Sam of 'arrogance' in a show in which both Jim and Liz have been openly boasting, respectively about their popularity on the show and outside it.

(Why did Jim tell Liz she was not famous btw? We will probably never know.)
Kabira
21-01-2014
Originally Posted by Oswald Mosley:
“I would sincerely love Sam to go.

Would be one of those great eviction upset moments.”

I would love it too.

I had both Jim and Liz as my two least favourite HM's on day one ( really disliked them )

and I cannot believe now that I would prefer them both to stay in over all of the HM's.

Very strange series this time for me.

I have never changed my mind on HM's so much.
HectorMcClure
21-01-2014
Originally Posted by wonkeydonkey:
“ When was she arrogant? She said less than almost anyone, just that she didn't think it was fair to be nominated for tactical reasons.

If anything, Sam is not arrogant ENOUGH. She needs a touch of Luisa swagger. It is particularly odd to single out Sam of 'arrogance' in a show in which both Jim and Liz have been openly boasting, respectively about their popularity on the show and outside it. ”

She went all huffy and had a wee moan. She did the exact same when Lee nominated her. She then continued to moan about it in the diary room.

It's as if she thinks she has a god given right to be in the house.

Jim simply gave Luisa a reality check, under extreme provocation. I couldn't think of a better way to respond given the endless amount of smearing and insults he has encountered. He didn't stoop to their level by being abusive or malicious. I thought it was brilliant. The look on Luisa's face! LOL

Can't wait to see the look on her face when Jimbo is crowned champion.
dog_eat_dog
21-01-2014
Originally Posted by wonkeydonkey:
“ When was she arrogant? She said less than almost anyone, just that she didn't think it was fair to be nominated for tactical reasons.

If anything, Sam is not arrogant ENOUGH. She needs a touch of Luisa swagger. It is particularly odd to single out Sam of 'arrogance' in a show in which both Jim and Liz have been openly boasting, respectively about their popularity on the show and outside it.
”

In fairness, Liz gave the exact same reason for nominating Sam as Sam gave for nominating Liz - namely that she doesn't make any effort to talk to her. That's a perfectly valid reason, so why Sam is getting so butthurt over it is anyone's guess. If you can't take it, don't dish it out.

In Jim's case, he nominated her because he (rightly) said if she went, it would make very little difference to him. Sam nominated him a few times herself, mainly in support of Linda. I don't think her reasoning was any more valid.

Why should Sam not expect to be nominated? She is a contestant, same as everyone else and has no problems nominating people herself. It does come off as rather arrogant, tbh.
wonkeydonkey
21-01-2014
Originally Posted by HectorMcClure:
“The look on Luisa's face! LOL

Can't wait to see the look on her face when Jimbo is crowned champion.”

There was no look on Luisa's face other than mild exasperation. And I have not the least idea what you expect to see on the final night. If Jim wins there is no reason why we should see anyone else's face at all except the person who comes second, and people almost never show anything at all when the winner is announced. Why would they? Do you honestly expect to see Luisa's face contorted with fury, or with tears coursing down her cheeks?

Caroline Wharram turning her back when Luke was announced winner, and Luke Marsden chanting something disagreeable when Rachel was announced winner are literally the only cases I can think of back to the year 2000 when anyone's face has shown anything. It is unthinkable in CBB when there is nothing at stake.
Originally Posted by dog_eat_dog:
“Why should Sam not expect to be nominated? She is a contestant, same as everyone else and has no problems nominating people herself. It does come off as rather arrogant, tbh.”

I can't see why it is such a difficult point for people to grasp. No one is complaining about the idea that anyone may be nominated: they are all grumbling, not just Sam, because they had an honest belief that a 'fair' nomination was based on something that had annoyed someone about the person they are nominating. Since both Jim and Liz have told Sam that they nominated her because they believe her to be invincibly popular, she feels, and everyone else agrees, that BB should not have accepted that nomination. They may be wrong - there is not enough precedent to show whether BB has accepted that kind of nomination in the past. Certainly Dave was allowed to nominate Rachael on just those grounds, but that was in a save and replace.

It really is possible to be a keen BB fan and never to have seen anyone nominated for being popular.
HectorMcClure
21-01-2014
Originally Posted by wonkeydonkey:
“There was no look on Luisa's face other than mild exasperation. And I have not the least idea what you expect to see on the final night. If Jim wins there is no reason why we should see anyone else's face at all except the person who comes second, and people almost never show anything at all when the winner is announced. Why would they? Do you honestly expect to see Luisa's face contorted with fury, or with tears coursing down her cheeks? ”

I think you need to go back and review the footage. She looked completely rattled. Her face dropped. Jim pointed out the facts (that he's more popular than her) and she didn't like it.

Oh, i'm quite sure we'll see her anger and bitterness!

They always show the evicted housemates sitting at the side. I'm sure her face will be a picture as a triumphant Jim walks down those stairs.

She will also have the opportunity to speak on BBBOTS. I'm sure she will be extremely bitter. She is a horrible person, truly vile. That's why most people cannot stand her.
dog_eat_dog
21-01-2014
Originally Posted by wonkeydonkey:
“I can't see why it is such a difficult point for people to grasp. No one is complaining about the idea that anyone may be nominated: they are all grumbling, not just Sam, because they had an honest belief that a 'fair' nomination was based on something that had annoyed someone about the person they are nominating. Since both Jim and Liz have told Sam that they nominated her because they believe her to be invincibly popular, she feels, and everyone else agrees, that BB should not have accepted that nomination.”

Actually, they gave perfectly valid reasons for nominating her in the diary room, just as she gave perfectly valid reasons for nominating them.

Afterwards, Liz admitted she wanted to go up against someone strong, but was still puzzled as to why Sam (and certain others) were making a big deal of it, when nominating is part of the CBB experience and she herself had been nominated by everyone!

Quote:
“They may be wrong - there is not enough precedent to show whether BB has accepted that kind of nomination in the past. Certainly Dave was allowed to nominate Rachael on just those grounds, but that was in a save and replace. ”

If I recall correctly, Victor Ebuwa was very open about tactical nominations.
Saying that, i think it's a moot point, because when voting in the diary room, they both gave valid reasons for voting for her; indeed Liz used the very same reason as Sam used for nominating her.
Trish123
21-01-2014
Originally Posted by wonkeydonkey:
“There was no look on Luisa's face other than mild exasperation. And I have not the least idea what you expect to see on the final night. If Jim wins there is no reason why we should see anyone else's face at all except the person who comes second, and people almost never show anything at all when the winner is announced. Why would they? Do you honestly expect to see Luisa's face contorted with fury, or with tears coursing down her cheeks?

Caroline Wharram turning her back when Luke was announced winner, and Luke Marsden chanting something disagreeable when Rachel was announced winner are literally the only cases I can think of back to the year 2000 when anyone's face has shown anything. It is unthinkable in CBB when there is nothing at stake.


I can't see why it is such a difficult point for people to grasp. No one is complaining about the idea that anyone may be nominated: they are all grumbling, not just Sam, because they had an honest belief that a 'fair' nomination was based on something that had annoyed someone about the person they are nominating. Since both Jim and Liz have told Sam that they nominated her because they believe her to be invincibly popular, she feels, and everyone else agrees, that BB should not have accepted that nomination. They may be wrong - there is not enough precedent to show whether BB has accepted that kind of nomination in the past. Certainly Dave was allowed to nominate Rachael on just those grounds, but that was in a save and replace.

It really is possible to be a keen BB fan and never to have seen anyone nominated for being popular.”

Jim gave a valid reason for nominating Sam. Unlike Sam's first nomination of Jim saying " I like Jim. He has done nothing to upset me but he upsets Linda"
Jim said if she disappeared for 2 days he wouldn't notice. That is true for viewers too. So Jim's nomination of Sam was far more just than hers for him imo.
weekarnygee
21-01-2014
They are all voting tactically eg Casey voting Jim. Watch the next round of nominations they are going to start voting outwith Jim and Liz (if Sam is evicted) because they now realise that as little as 2 votes can put you up. The best thing for the show would be for Sam to go because it would freak them out and maybe a few masks would start slipping and we might see a few peoples real characters coming out.
ultros
21-01-2014
Originally Posted by HectorMcClure:
“I think you need to go back and review the footage. She looked completely rattled. Her face dropped. Jim pointed out the facts (that he's more popular than her) and she didn't like it.

Oh, i'm quite sure we'll see her anger and bitterness!

They always show the evicted housemates sitting at the side. I'm sure her face will be a picture as a triumphant Jim walks down those stairs.

She will also have the opportunity to speak on BBBOTS. I'm sure she will be extremely bitter. She is a horrible person, truly vile. That's why most people cannot stand her.”

I think you are imagining things Hector old chap ... or rather seeing what you want to see

As soon as he said it she hits back with a grin 'No I just find it bewildering that women are voting for you when you're so openly sexist' which HE didn't seem to like

And then as the conversation went on he said that if she thought he had any feelings for her he would jump out of a building ... and she said 'so if I pretend to think that you have feelings for me will you jump out of a building? How about the lodge? Will you jump out of the lodge window?'

She basicly trolled the arse off him AGAIN lol.
BROXI BEAR
21-01-2014
Such a shame, Sam needs to go.
mrblank
21-01-2014
i like liz more then sam,but if liz goes and assuming the next set of noms are nomal the the HMs will have the easy option of nominating jim and liz taken away
snariek
21-01-2014
Originally Posted by HectorMcClure:
“I think you need to go back and review the footage. She looked completely rattled. Her face dropped. Jim pointed out the facts (that he's more popular than her) and she didn't like it.

Oh, i'm quite sure we'll see her anger and bitterness!

They always show the evicted housemates sitting at the side. I'm sure her face will be a picture as a triumphant Jim walks down those stairs.

She will also have the opportunity to speak on BBBOTS. I'm sure she will be extremely bitter. She is a horrible person, truly vile. That's why most people cannot stand her.”

You clearly must be watching different footage to the rest of us, or else just seeing what you want to see.

Well I hope you're not too dissapointed on finale night when Luisa doesn't explode with rage because it seems like that's the only reason you want Jim to win. The whole house knows Jim is the most popular, he's topped the vote every eviction so far, and probably will do again this Wednesday. It truly baffles me that people expect there to be some kind of shock if he wins
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map