Originally Posted by snariek:
“I'm not saying it was fair and I'm not saying Sam's or other reasons in that same vein shouldn't be challenged. The point I keep making is that there's no way Jim would not have been able to come up with a valid reason for nominating Linda!”
“I'm not saying it was fair and I'm not saying Sam's or other reasons in that same vein shouldn't be challenged. The point I keep making is that there's no way Jim would not have been able to come up with a valid reason for nominating Linda!”
I understand your point. However my point is.. BB challenged lee when he voted sam as we have already discussed and now they have challenged jim ..therefore they are interfering and manipulating the nomination. Otherwise they would have challenged sams reason but they were happy with whom shed nominated and clearly NOT happy with lee and jims!!



