Originally Posted by moox:
“Something I have noticed repeatedly is that O2/VF customers seem to believe that shoddy internet or coverage is a fact of life, that "all networks are the same" and that there is no point changing.”
Agreed, my barber (been on O2 since before it was BTCellnet) used to say just that. Now though, after some encouragement from and the "what handset do you have" conversation with me, he's now on Three - and is as happy as a pig in muck

heh.
Originally Posted by moox:
“I also believe that this is why Cameron decided that mobile coverage is suddenly a huge priority after he was in Cornwall and couldn't get a signal to contact anyone while something was happening abroad. Vodafone is a major supplier to government, and Polzeath (where he was reported to be at the time) conveniently is a Vodafone blackspot. If he was on another network he'd have had no problems at all.”
Yes, he had problems while visiting Norfolk too. There were some reports in the local papers at the time (which went national) about his complaining about having to wave his phone around outside to get a signal and make a call. I know the local MP has had similar issues on O2 before, plus complaining about his battery dropping like a stone when on (as it turned out) auto 2G/3G mode.
Originally Posted by moox:
“Personally, I find it hilarious watching V-O2 customers struggle to get email on their crappy GPRS connections while I'm streaming Netflix in HD next to them on the train, on 3.
The difference is like night and day. EE/3 in Cornwall is extremely good, most of the 3G blackspots are normally 2G blackspots too, and speeds/latency are fine. EE 4G is continuing to get better. Vodafone and O2 2G coverage is of course superb (for voice/text, not data as GPRS is useless), but the 3G coverage continues to severely lack, and many places that now have Vodafone 3G might as well not have it, because the performance is so crap. No 4G yet of course.”
Likewise, although it's long distance bus here as there's a distinct lack of rail lines in the county. West of Norwich in particular it's like night and day - VF/O2 with (weaker than you'd expect) GPRS, while EE and Three happily rattle along on 3G.
As you say though, O2 is fine here too for voice/texts (despite it's lack of HD Voice) as long as you don't go too far out into the sticks. Vodafone though, well, traditionally it's been fine here for 2G, but as time goes on something seems very wrong - I know a remarkable amount of people who, off their own backs, are leaving the network due to it 'not working anymore', so make of that what you will.
Originally Posted by moox:
“It will be very interesting to see what 3 or Hutchison do if they get the O2 sale through the authorities”
Agreed. One of the most irritating things about O2 here (at least for me) is that they have a mast very close to me, practically line of sight and about as close as my nearest MBNL mast, however it's only (surprise surprise) 2G, and has been that way for several years. Hopefully, if this all goes through, with Hutch/Three in charge it might actually get 3G'd (as it's well positioned), which would be nice.