DS Forums

 
 

Vodafone and O2 4G experience thread


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-01-2016, 23:39
beans0ntoast
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 932
I mean he says he travels everywhere including the South West!!!!!
WTF??
Does he only travel to the South West bits that have 3G/4G because there really aren't that many. I mean you can't even get down here without only being on 2G a lot!
Of course if he's a Luddite who only needs voice then we are in a whole different ballpark!!!
Yep, Wavejock!
He'd be no good travelling to East Northamptonshire as the vast majority of that area (outside of densely populated areas) is 2G only too!

I hope he doesn't go to North Norfolk either... because there is a lot of Norfolk that is 2G only.. However, on a more positive note, the Ingoldisthorpe mast has gone Vod 2G/3G/4G and the Wells-Next-The-Sea mast have gone CTIL 2G/3G(900)/4G.

You can tell whether a CTIL mast is 3G900 or 3G2100 because you can go to O2's checker and click the link that says about phones that don't work on 3G900. It will then show the 3G2100 coverage.

edit: Found another sticky situation for Vod (though O2 is ok), and that is Fakenham, Norfolk. I'd say that is quite a densely populated area. EE/MBNL fine coverage on 2100. O2's checker says good for 3G 22100. Vodafone? No coverage!
It's like a re-run of Totnes again!
beans0ntoast is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 05-01-2016, 00:14
DevonBloke
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Totnes, Devon
Posts: 6,694
I realised tonight that I now have continuous 4G from Totnes to home (well except the last 300 yards). That means I now have the same from Torquay to home which is about 12 miles. (since the new mast came on before Christmas)
My Son got an iPod touch (don't I know it : ) for Christmas and my Nephew had sent him some videos over iMessage.
He hooked up to my hotspot and watched them all the way home over 4G.
Not sure why I'm enthusing about that too much since he could have done that over 3G as well.
I guess it's because the entire journey (pretty much) would have been EDGE then GPRS on Vodafone.
I hope Gigabit is right and they pull their finger out soon.
Would be nice to have some options one day.
DevonBloke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2016, 01:07
jonmorris
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: a land filled with trolls
Posts: 12,021
I'm now finding it hard to ever go down to 2G on Vodafone in my daily travels, and when I'm on 3G the speeds are often in excess of 10Mbps which is amazing given it wasn't that long ago that 3G could still mean speeds of 0.05Mbps or even less.

In London, I was getting speeds in the 90s and even outside over 60, on 4G, comparing well with EE and even beating EE at times.

I'm really looking forward to seeing how the networks compare by the end of the year. Vodafone must be starting to use its 2600 in more and more places now and it's moving a big difference.
jonmorris is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2016, 08:10
Skippy2005
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 731
He'd be no good travelling to East Northamptonshire as the vast majority of that area (outside of densely populated areas) is 2G only too!

I hope he doesn't go to North Norfolk either... because there is a lot of Norfolk that is 2G only.. However, on a more positive note, the Ingoldisthorpe mast has gone Vod 2G/3G/4G and the Wells-Next-The-Sea mast have gone CTIL 2G/3G(900)/4G.

You can tell whether a CTIL mast is 3G900 or 3G2100 because you can go to O2's checker and click the link that says about phones that don't work on 3G900. It will then show the 3G2100 coverage.

edit: Found another sticky situation for Vod (though O2 is ok), and that is Fakenham, Norfolk. I'd say that is quite a densely populated area. EE/MBNL fine coverage on 2100. O2's checker says good for 3G 22100. Vodafone? No coverage!
It's like a re-run of Totnes again!
I don't think that's entirely correct as I believe Vodafone is rolling out a nationwide 3G2100 network as well as 3G900, where as o2 are using 3G900 in less built up areas, that's what I was led to believe, I'd be happy for someone to correct me.
Skippy2005 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2016, 10:22
moox
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,646
I mean he says he travels everywhere including the South West!!!!!
WTF??
Does he only travel to the South West bits that have 3G/4G because there really aren't that many. I mean you can't even get down here without only being on 2G a lot!
Of course if he's a Luddite who only needs voice then we are in a whole different ballpark!!!
Yep, Wavejock!
He certainly doesn't travel to my bit of the SW either. Maybe he means Bristol and Bath which are probably brimming with high quality Vodafone 4G out of every mast and tower? He must never use his phone in the car or on the train either
moox is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2016, 10:28
jonmorris
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: a land filled with trolls
Posts: 12,021
I am not sure the exact plans, other than Vodafone saying they'll be refarming a lot of 2G 900 for 3G, and expecting that this will mean VoLTE isn't as important as it will be elsewhere. Presumably they hope to turn up 800 coverage a bit more, and have most people fall back to 3G for voice as they would today (or 2G).
jonmorris is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2016, 12:24
GreenLantern
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: London, UK
Posts: 178
Just on the train from Paddington to Bristol or Bath, half the journey is 2G/No Signal on Vodafone let alone the parts where the coverage might be considered useable.

Then again I'm aware the old Intercity 125s don't do much for signal penetration.

Having said that EE seem to manage a useable(ish) 3G connection for most of the journey - and again on the Virgin service on the WCML - can't say I use the east coast enough to comment on that one.
GreenLantern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2016, 12:48
moox
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,646
Just on the train from Paddington to Bristol or Bath, half the journey is 2G/No Signal on Vodafone let alone the parts where the coverage might be considered useable.

Then again I'm aware the old Intercity 125s don't do much for signal penetration.

Having said that EE seem to manage a useable(ish) 3G connection for most of the journey - and again on the Virgin service on the WCML - can't say I use the east coast enough to comment on that one.
The HSTs/IC125 are better than most trains in my opinion. If there's a signal outside it's going to be almost as good inside.

It's the newer trains that are literal faraday cages - such as the Voyagers that CrossCountry/Virgin use.

MBNL has generally good coverage of both main lines to the SW IMO.
moox is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2016, 13:17
jonmorris
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: a land filled with trolls
Posts: 12,021
Older trains are better for signal as they won't have solar reflecting film to aid the HVAC - which restricts signals.

Those trains are getting Wi-Fi now so that should help a bit.

The new trains will likely be like other modern trains. I wonder how the similar designed Class 395 trains on Southeastern are for phone signal? Might give a clue.
jonmorris is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2016, 13:18
Gigabit
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,887
South West Trains trains are terrible for signal.
Gigabit is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2016, 13:35
jonmorris
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: a land filled with trolls
Posts: 12,021
Same reason. Film to reduce internal temperatures in the summer. Again, on the newer trains. Older ones should be fine as they're mostly made of cardboard!
jonmorris is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2016, 15:19
Gigabit
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,887
Same reason. Film to reduce internal temperatures in the summer. Again, on the newer trains. Older ones should be fine as they're mostly made of cardboard!
I can't remember the oldest trains that they use but I haven't been on one in the last 5 years that has been good for signal.
Gigabit is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2016, 18:21
beans0ntoast
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 932
I don't think that's entirely correct as I believe Vodafone is rolling out a nationwide 3G2100 network as well as 3G900, where as o2 are using 3G900 in less built up areas, that's what I was led to believe, I'd be happy for someone to correct me.
I didn't know that, but I know for certain that some masts are 3G900 only, i.e. no 3G2100.

For example, an old VOD mast in Woodhall Spa (Lincs) was upgraded from 2G900 to 2G900, 3G900, 4G800. If you look at the top right photo on this page: http://pedroc.co.uk/recognising_voda..._4G_setups.htm you'll see the long panels in use on another mast. Those same long panels were used on the Woodhall Spa mast.

I think that in rural areas, CTIL are going for more coverage via 3G900. If CTIL roll out nationwide 3G900 (on virtually every mast), they could refarm 2G900 to 3G900 to help with capacity. Most phones nowadays have 3G900 capability.
beans0ntoast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2016, 18:39
jaffboy151
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Woore, Cheshire/Shropshire
Posts: 1,675
Anyone have a idea how much of 2g 900mhz Vodafone plan to refarm for 3g?
Am I correct in thinking there only using 5mhz at the moment?
jaffboy151 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2016, 18:44
Skippy2005
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 731
Anyone have a idea how much of 2g 900mhz Vodafone plan to refarm for 3g?
Am I correct in thinking there only using 5mhz at the moment?
Currently I think it's 5mhz MIMO to increase the capacity, 2x10 would be nice turned up then 800 can match.

I can easily get 10mb from my mast on 900, at any time of day sometimes a little more.
Skippy2005 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2016, 20:51
Pedro_C
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 660
Vodafone seem to like the clamp on new top shrouded antennas for replica telegraph poles.
Pedro_C is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2016, 20:58
jchamier
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: This forum
Posts: 3,392
Spoils the telegraph pole look with that. A similar monopole near me has a tiny whip on top which I thought to start with could be a lightning conductor. I think its O2's.
jchamier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2016, 22:30
jaffboy151
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Woore, Cheshire/Shropshire
Posts: 1,675
This is the planned design for a replica telegraph pole mast close to me, https://www.dropbox.com/s/k3irazh0ew...40191.pdf?dl=0
Should look quite smart.much nicer then those fudged top hat ones in Pedro's pictures. Here it is in its present state (almost) https://www.dropbox.com/s/q7hych84sp...09-17.png?dl=0
It now has an additional Huawei cabinet in place and I'm 80% sure the existing mast is somehow 4G'd.
jaffboy151 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2016, 22:37
clewsy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,860
I thought they had been turned down in Stone? They come back in again?
clewsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2016, 22:47
Pedro_C
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 660
This is the planned design for a replica telegraph pole mast close to me, https://www.dropbox.com/s/k3irazh0ew...40191.pdf?dl=0
Should look quite smart.much nicer then those fudged top hat ones in Pedro's pictures. Here it is in its present state (almost) https://www.dropbox.com/s/q7hych84sp...09-17.png?dl=0
It now has an additional Huawei cabinet in place and I'm 80% sure the existing mast is somehow 4G'd.
That was planned for the ones in the top pictures. Probably decided they no longer needed the future expansion. Unless the fudged hat is bigger than I thought. Perspective can do weird things...
Pedro_C is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2016, 00:13
jaffboy151
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Woore, Cheshire/Shropshire
Posts: 1,675
I thought they had been turned down in Stone? They come back in again?
The mast in the pictures & plans is near Trentham Gardens clewsy, though just noticed tonight Vodafone has reapplied for planning permission for one of the masts in Stone, on the Litchfield Road,
Sensibly they've decided to go with the taller replica telegraph pole this time as the green Street pole was chucked out.
I'm sure it will still get heeps if objections if not for the height increase then for the extra cabinet, whilst moaning about mobile reception on the local got I'm... but that's Stone for you, wonder if Bill Cash MP will personally object this time..
jaffboy151 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2016, 07:14
clewsy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,860
I thought that looked like Trentham, however mobile coverage at the village isn't too good at all. Your right about Stone though, however these people need to weigh up what they want from their mobile phones.
clewsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2016, 08:58
M1kos
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 499
Bromley council near me have turned down so many new site monopoles I've lost count now vo2 are trying again at many of the same sites with those top hat type silly 10m masts with only one big cabinet that won't even clear the roofs of the houses! Why are some councils just so anti mast
M1kos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2016, 09:03
M1kos
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 499
Here's the one in Bexleyheath due to go live next week https://www.dropbox.com/s/0hie0ijtda..._0237.JPG?dl=0
M1kos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2016, 21:05
InfamousTeal
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 303
This is a good read.

Spoke to a guy on the vodafone live chat today to ask if he knew any dates for when 4G would be coming. He said in 4 days time, which I assume is not correct, there's been no work done to the mast and none planned, but we'll see.

My main point, he didn't know what a mast was. Here's some of our conversation:

Me: and do you know where that mast will be exactly?
Shubham: I didn't get you , Can you please elaborate
James: where is the new 4G mast?
Shubham: Mast,???? What do you mean by Mast ?
James: the thing that provides signal
James: the cell tower
Shubham: Oh, James, We will be Installing that on this Sunday
James: yes, i know. where is it though?
Shubham: James, I am not sure about the location as I am from offshore Webchat team and that will be decided by our technical team and they have all the information regarding it

So that's reassuring. I then tested to see if he knew Northern Ireland was part of the UK, he didn't, and told me I'd be roaming and it'd cost me extra, which is entirely wrong.

Then, I asked him to check a postcode for me for 4G plans, (the third one I'd asked him to check, but he seemed to be doing them quickly and easily) and he replied with this rather out of nowhere response:

Shubham: James, I'd like to inform you that 4G services are not a Joke, it takes a lot of investment and time to make the 4 G signals available

What is he even talking about? had a good giggle at some of his answers
InfamousTeal is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:01.