|
||||||||
Thank you Ian Lee |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 487
|
Quote:
I'm quite happy to spend money to ensure justice prevails. Channel 5 can have a few pounds. I'm doing it in support of JIM and because I want him to TO WIN.
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 278
|
Quote:
Awww, diddums, poor Jim, those meanies being nasty (truthful and spot on) about him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 7,584
|
Quote:
Finally the first positive Jim comment on tonight's Bots! Took a while
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 580
|
Quote:
Awww, diddums, poor Jim, those meanies being nasty (truthful and spot on) about him.
What did Ian say? |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 874
|
Great show. Davifson is a master manipulator!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 33,311
|
Quote:
And it's interesting on BOTS how everyone is now praising Jim for his 'acting'. Like everyone who votes for him has been fooled by an act, basically calling them all idiots. Not only that but praising Linda for 'being herself'. Anyone who has watched Bb knows for a fact that you can't act in there for more than a few days before the mask slips. But that has all been conveniently forgotten about in Jim's case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Green Hills of Earth
Posts: 80,438
|
lol at folks calling the panel "witches" (they actually are not but neither were those in past times burned at the stake or dunked in rivers till they drowned) and casting doubt on their qualifications (they actually are qualified but that doesn't mean they have to be like Ollie and not express an opinion).
But I would be pissed off if I was a Jim fan so I know where the complainers are coming from because past BOTS have done the same thing to my favourite. With Linda and Carol there (neither of whom has the appropriate qualifications) the panel was biased. However, Carol was pre-booked as a regular panelist and Linda was only there because viewers wanted her there. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,531
|
Don't like Jim, least favourite, didn't want him to win etc etc until tonight. Really want him to win after that diabolical show tonight. Complete character assassination from everyone on the show (apart from one small comment by Iain). Really ridiculous, particularly during the final week.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,128
|
The 'Linda Love-in' ..what a joke ..Carol just got shut down there when she said anything that was deemed supportive of Jim ... follow the script Carol or you're toast. Im not suggesting it should be a 'Jim Love-in' just a bit more balanced would be nice
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,451
|
Did state on a earlier thread that the bullets would start to fly at Jim's direction from the production staff. It is blatantly obvious they want one of the two bores to win,Sam or Ollie. You watch they will set Jim up big time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 169
|
Quote:
Lee has been told in his earpiece to say something positive about jim. They know someone has majorly messed up booking this lot of man haters tonight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,999
|
Quote:
lol at folks calling the panel "witches" (they actually are not but neither were those in past times burned at the stake or dunked in rivers till they drowned) and casting doubt on their qualifications (they actually are qualified but that doesn't mean they have to be like Ollie and not express an opinion).
But I would be pissed off if I was a Jim fan so I know where the complainers are coming from because past BOTS have done the same thing to my favourite. With Linda and Carol there (neither of whom has the appropriate qualifications) the panel was biased. However, Carol was pre-booked as a regular panelist and Linda was only there because viewers wanted her there. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 5,332
|
looks like ian wont be on that show again
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Green Hills of Earth
Posts: 80,438
|
Quote:
looks like ian wont be on that show again
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,835
|
Quote:
I turned it off. Was very annoying listening to 3 feminists showering Linda with heaps of praise for being such a strong woman whilst launching attacks on Jim for causing Linda to get annoyied it was ridiculous! The point were one of the hags sympathized with Linda for not being strong enough to crack Jim but that she made a good attempt was the nail in the coffin for me.
To give Carol her due, she was not part of the slating panel. However, very weird having Linda Nolan on if it is true what she claims about her self harming, whilst on the show. Think the lawyers are going to have an easy time making a case for Jim and how he has been portrayed on BBOTS, starting with Linda's exit interview. |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 7,584
|
Quote:
Don't like Jim, least favourite, didn't want him to win etc etc until tonight. Really want him to win after that diabolical show tonight. Complete character assassination from everyone on the show (apart from one small comment by Iain). Really ridiculous, particularly during the final week.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,128
|
Quote:
To give Carol her due, she was not part of the slating panel. However, very weird having Linda Nolan on if it is true what she claims about her self harming, whilst on the show. Think the lawyers are going to have an easy time making a case for Jim and how he has been portrayed on BBOTS, starting with Linda's exit interview.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 5,332
|
Quote:
It was the last of the season.
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,943
|
Quote:
Calling the woman on the BOTS penal "witches" is sexist too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,500
|
Quote:
I wouldn't mind them being truthful about Jim if they were equally truthful about Linda.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Green Hills of Earth
Posts: 80,438
|
Quote:
Which part of the word witch is sexist? As has already been mentioned... not all witches are female.
![]() 2 • informal an ugly or unpleasant old woman. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/de.../english/witch No-one was suggesting that the panellists actually practised witchcraft. "Witch" and "Coven" are negative terms applied to female housemates. |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 439
|
Quote:
It's interesting how often sexist language such as calling them a "coven" occurs in a series that features Jim Davidson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 19,616
|
Quote:
It doesn't really matter whether it was Jim and Linda or any of the other HMs - they have absolutely no right to express their views as 'truths' and tell the viewers that 'X is lying', as fact. It is still only their opinion, psychology is not an exact science, and given that Ch5 are paying their salary .............
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: The cheap seats.
Posts: 8,713
|
Quote:
Lee has been told in his earpiece to say something positive about jim. They know someone has majorly messed up booking this lot of man haters tonight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 571
|
Quote:
The ironic thing is Jim probably couldn't give a monkeys to$$ if he won of not - he's proved his point.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:40.






