Originally Posted by Penny Crayon:
“That's a very good and thoughtful post OP. A good read with some very valid points.
I know this is very simplistic to say though but ...........perhaps she simply doesn't like him. I don't like him - I've been challenged on it (on here) and I sometimes cannot find a way to express it. I think it's his whole mean spirited, cruel, spiteful demeanour - onstage and in interviews that I don't like. Perhaps she just doesn't like him.”
“That's a very good and thoughtful post OP. A good read with some very valid points.
I know this is very simplistic to say though but ...........perhaps she simply doesn't like him. I don't like him - I've been challenged on it (on here) and I sometimes cannot find a way to express it. I think it's his whole mean spirited, cruel, spiteful demeanour - onstage and in interviews that I don't like. Perhaps she just doesn't like him.”
A problem with the OP's conjectures, imo, is that they assume that Linda's attitude towards Jim in CBB is completely out of line with how he's been in CBB, so that a big explanation from the past is needed: something like "she sees him as the embodiment of her darkest times".
I don't think that's so. Jim Davidson's been nasty enough for long enough that disliking him is not something that needs a big explanation. Linda has more reasons to dislike him than most, and some of them are personal, but that doesn't mean she sees him in such grand, symbolic terms. (The past would, however, make it easier for him to push her buttons and wind her up.)
So a conjecture like in the OP also needs Jim to have behaved well in CBB, so that Linda's reactions can be so unreasonable as to need the big explanation. I don't think he has. Linda and Jim were getting along at first, and then (she said) "the comments started". I find that very credible, given what I've seen of him and his tactics in CBB.





I don't blame her for a second for refusing to sit cosily on the sofa and confide her personal problems to him.


