Originally Posted by misslibertine:
“They are given an assessment, but the Channel 4 test allowed Shabaz, Nikki and Lea through all in one series, and I can't imagine the C5 test would be any more scrupulous - I think it was Denise Welch who said herself that she probably shouldn't have been allowed in. They had Kerry Katona on too after all, with her history of bipolar disorder.”
One wonders if the assessment is adequate. Some psychologists have expressed concerns about the ethics of BB since the early days and even later. These articles pertain to some of those concerns re the housemates mental health/welfare
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/5008062.stm
2006 Concerns -
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1526...chologist.html
2 of the shows psychologists investigated for alleged misconduct here:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/me...er-711122.html
One of the Psychologists was dismissed from his University post and is appealing against this at the moment. It was pertaining to his media work according to some articles about this.
There is a lot of information via search engines pertaining to mental health and welfare for the contestants, one psychologist left after only 2 shows because of concerns that the producers weren't interested in this
BB producers have a Duty of Care to housemates. A risk assessment for mental health and stress issues should ideally be conducted prior to entry and certainly at stages during the show or if circumstances change.
In the early days the psychologists assessed people prior to entry and monitored them during the programme. They were also debriefed on leaving the house and offered aftercare if needed. I wonder if this is happening now.
In light of Linda Nolans allegations in the paper today I really do think BB producers need to tighten up in this respect and rethink the assessment of contestants before, during and after the show